Comparing legal cultures: The comparativist as participant observer

Contrasts in Criminal Justice: Getting from Here to There

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 139-156

  Hodgson, Jacqueline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048810070     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315193779     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Berlins, M. and Dyer, C. (1986), The Law Machine, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
2. Bridges, L. and Choongh, S. (1998), Improving Police Station Legal Advice: The impact of the accreditation scheme for police station legal advisers, Research Study No. 31, London: The Law Society and Legal Aid Board.
3. Cooper, J. (1991), ‘Criminal Investigations in France’, New Law Journal, 381-2.
4. Damaska, M. (1975), ‘Structures of Authority and Comparative Criminal Procedure’, Yale Law Journal, 84,480-544.
5. Delmas-Marty, M. (President) Commission Justice Pénale et Droits de l’Homme (1991), La mise en étatdes affaires pénales, Paris: La Documentation Française.
6. Devlin, P. (1979), The Judge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Ferrari, V. (1992), ‘Socio-legal Concepts and their Comparison’ in E. Øyen (ed.), Comparative Methodology, London: Sage.
8. Flood, J. (1981), ‘Researching Barristers’ Clerks’, in R. Luckham (ed.), Law and Social Enquiry: Case Studies of Research, Uppsala: Uppsala Offcenter Ab.
9. Frankenberg, G. (1985), ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 26 (2), 411-55.
10. Field, S. (1994), ‘Judicial Supervision and the Pre-Trial Process’, Journal of Law and Society, 21 (1), 119-35.
11. Frase, R.S. (1990), ‘Comparative Criminal Justice as a Guide to American Law Reform: How Do the French Do It, How Can We Find Out, and Why Should We Care?’, California Law Review, 78, 539-683.
12. Goldstein, A. and Marcus, M. (1977), ‘The Myth of Judicial Supervision in Three “Inquisitorial” Systems: France, Italy and Germany’, Yale Law Journal, 87,24083.
13. Hobbs, D. and May, T. (eds) (1993), Interpreting the Field: Accounts of Ethnography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Kohn, M.L. (1989), ‘Cross-national Research as an Analytical Strategy’, in M.L. Kohn (ed.), Cross-national Research in Sociology, New Park, CA: Sage.
15. Langbein, J.H. and Weinreb, L.L. (1978), ‘Continental Criminal Procedure: “Myth” and Reality’, Yale Law Journal, 87 (8), 1549-69.
16. Legrand, P. (1995), ‘Comparative Legal Studies and Commitment to Theory’, Modern Law Review, 58 (2), 262-73.
17. Legrand, P. (1996), ‘How to compare now’, Legal Studies, 16 (2), 232-42.
18. Leigh, L.H. and Zedner, L. (1992), A Report on the Administration of Criminal Justice in the Pre-Trial phase in France and Germany, London: HMSO.
19. McCall, G. and Simmons, J. (eds) (1969), Issues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. McConville, M. and Bridges, L. (1994), Criminal Justice in Crisis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
21. McConville, M. and Hodgson, J. (1993), Custodial Legal Advice and the Right to Silence, London: HMSO.
22. McConville, M., Hodgson, J., Bridges, L. and Pavlovic, A. (1994), Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23. Magendie, J.-C. and Gomez, J.-J. (1986), Justices, Paris: Atlas Economica.
24. Mansfield, M. and Wardle, T. (1993), Presumed Guilty, London: Heinemann.
25. May, T. (1993), ‘Feelings Matter: Inverting the Hidden Equation’, in D. Hobbs and T. May (eds), Interpreting the Field, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26. Merle, R. and Vitu, A. (1979), Traité de Droit Pénale, Vol. 2 Procédure Pénale, (3rd edn), Paris: Cujas.
27. Mendelson, W. (1983), ‘Self Incrimination in American and French Law’, Criminal Law Bulletin, 19, 34-50.
28. Øyen, E. (ed.) (1992), Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research, London: Sage.
29. Pakter, W. (1985), ‘Exclusionary Rules in France, Germany and Italy’, Hastings International Journal of Comparative Law Review, 9(1), 1-57.
30. Puchalska-Tych, B. and Salter, M. (1996), ‘Comparing legal cultures of Eastern Europe: The Need for a Dialectical Analysis’, Legal Studies, 16 (2), 157-84.
31. Rogowski, R. (ed.) (1996a), Civil Law, Aldershot: Dartmouth.
32. Rogowski, R. (1996b), ‘The Art of Mirroring: Comparative Law and Social Theory’, in G. Wilson and R. Rogowski (eds), Challenges to European Legal Scholarship, London: Blackstone Press.
33. Rose, D. (1996), In the Name of the Law, London: Cape.
34. Rose, R. (1991), ‘Comparing Forms of Comparative Analysis’, Political Studies, XXXIX, 446-62.
35. Sanday, P.R. (1983), ‘The Ethnographic Paradigm(s)’ in J. Van Maanen (ed.), Qualitative Methodology, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Tomlinson, E.A. (1983), ‘Nonadversarial Justice: The French Experience’, Maryland Law Review, 40 (1), 131-95.
37. Van Maanen, J. (1981), ‘Notes on the Production of Ethnographic Data in an American Police Agency’, in P. Luckham (ed.), Law and Social Enquiry: Case Studies of Research, Uppsala: Uppsala Offcenter Ab.
38. Van Maanen, J. (1983), Qualitative Methodology, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Zedner, L. (1995), ‘Comparative Research in Criminal Justice’, in L. Oaks, M. Maguire and M. Levi (eds), Contemporary Issues in Criminology, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 8-25.