Identifying potential users of technology for technology transfer using patent citation analysis: a case analysis of a Korean research institute

Scientometrics

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 1541-1558

  Park, Tae Young ^a   Lim, Hyungjoo ^b   Ji, Ilyong ^b  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b Korea University of Technology and Education   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Co classification; Patent citation; Path dependence; Potential user; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048664614     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2792-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44–60
2. Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics., 88(4), 774–779
3. Almeida, P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 155–165
4. Arora, A., & Fosfuri, A. (2003). Licensing the market for technology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52, 277–295
5. Arora, Ashish, Fosfuri, A., & Gambarcella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419–451
6. Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (2010). Ideas for rent: An overview of markets for technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 775–803
7. Blackwell, D. R., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior. Boston: Harcount
8. Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploraroty analysis of scientists and inventors networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26
9. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162
10. Gambardella, A., & Giarratan, M. S. (2009). General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology. Research Policy, 42(4), 315–325
11. Hall, B. H., & Helmers, C. (2013). Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: Can patent commons help? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66, 33–51
12. Johnson, D. K. N. (2002). The OECD technology concordance, patents by industry of manufacturer and sector of uses, OECD STI Working Paper
13. JOINS (2013). The R&D productivity of Government funded research institute stagnates at 2.9%, JOINS, 17 July 2013. http://news.joins.com/article/12092504
14. Jürgens, B., & Clarke, N. (2018). Study and comparison of the unique selling propositions (USPs) of free-to-use multinational patent search systems. World Patent Information, 52, 9–16
15. Kani, M., & Motohashi, K. (2012). Understanding the technology market for patent: New insights from licensing survey of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 41(1), 226–235
16. KIBO. (2014). Vitalizing technology transfer via technology financing. Seoul: Korea technology finance corporation
17. Kim, Y. (2009). Choosing between international technology licensing partners: An empirical analysis of U.S. biotechnology firms. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 57–72
18. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing management (12th ed.). London: Pearson education
19. Kum, Y.-S., & Ko, Y.-J. (2011). A study on the diffusion of R&D performance for strengthening global competitiveness through patent analysis. The Journal of Intellectual Property, 6(2), 191–229
20. Lee, S.-J., et al. (2013). Identifying promising IT products for SMEs under the concept of business ecosystem. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 39(1), 61–72
21. Lichtenthaler, U. (2010). Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right ‘job’ for your technology. Technovation, 30, 429–435
22. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Kerin, R. (1984). Introducing strategies for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Management Science, 30(12), 1389–1404
23. Mohamed, A. S. I., Azizan, N. B., & Jali, M. Z. (2013). The impact of trust and past experience on intention to purchase in E-Commerce. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development., 7(10), 28–35
24. MSIP & KISTEP. (2016). Major South Korean science and technology indicators at a glance. Ministry of Science: IT and Future Planning & KISTEP
25. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1977). In search for a useful theofy of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76
26. Sanditov, B. (2005). Patent citations, the value of innovations and path-dependency, CESPRI working paper No. 177. Milano
27. Schacht, W. H. (2007). Technology transfer: Use of federally funded research and development, congressional research service
28. Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., Frietsch, R. (2003). Linking technology areas to industrial sectors: Final report to the European commission, DG Research, Karlsruhe, Paris
29. Seo, I., et al. (2011). Exploring potential users of technology using semantic network analysis. Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(1), 279–301
30. Seok, M. S., et al. (2015). An application of patent citation network analysis for technology marketing: A case of a public research institute. Journal of the Korean Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society., 16(5), 3210–3219
31. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305
32. Wu, P. C. S., Yeh, G. Y.-Y., & Hsiao, C.-R. (2011). The effect of store image and service quality on brand image and purchase intention for private label brands. Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 30–39
33. Yang, D.-W., & Kim, S.-J. (2008). The study on tech transfer problems of R&D institutions. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 21(1), 205–227