Reassessing the duration of the second stage of labor in relation to maternal and neonatal morbidity

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 345-353

  Grantz, Katherine L ^a,b,c   Sundaram, Rajeshwari ^a,b,c   Ma, Ling ^a,b,c   Hinkle, Stefanie ^a,b,c   Berghella, Vincenzo ^a,b,c   Hoffman, Matthew K ^a,b,c   Reddy, Uma M ^a,b,c  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FETUS HEART RATE; HUMAN; LABOR STAGE 2; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTIPARA; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DISEASE; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTOR;

ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85048525693     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002431     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:57-67.
2. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1181-93.
3. Hamilton G. On mortality from the use of forceps. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev 1853;11:511.
4. Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, Varner MW, Spong CY, Ramin SM, et al. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: Relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:357.e1-7.
5. Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:326.e1-10.
6. Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F. Competing risk analysis using R: An easy guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;40:381-7.
7. Hellman LM, Prystowsky H. The duration of the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952;63:1223-33.
8. Hamilton G. On the proper management of tedious labors. Br Foreign Med Chir Rev 1871;48:449.
9. Cohen WR. Influence of the duration of second stage labor on perinatal outcome and puerperal morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:266-9.
10. Moon JM, Smith CV, Rayburn WF. Perinatal outcome after a prolonged second stage of labor. J Reprod Med 1990;35:229-31.
11. Saunders NS, Paterson CM, Wadsworth J. Neonatal and maternal morbidity in relation to the length of the second stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:381-5.
12. Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C, Morrison I. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:906-12.
13. Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:52-8.
14. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:933-8.
15. Allen VM, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, McKeen D, Allen AC. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1248-58.
16. Operative vaginal delivery. Practice Bulletin No. 154. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e56-65.
17. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1279-95.