DAISY: A practical computer-based tool for semi-automated species identification

Automated Taxon Identification in Systematics: Theory, Approaches and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 101-114

  O’Neill, Mark A ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048472545     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420008074     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Aleksander, I. and Stonham, T.J. (1979) Guide to pattern recognition using random-access memories. Computers and Digital Techniques, 2: 29-40.
2. Aloni, D. (2004) Co-operative Linux. In Proceedings of the Linux Symposium (ed A.J. Hutton), Volume 1, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 23-32.
3. Austin, J. (1998) RAM-Based Neural Networks, World Scientific, York, 200 pp.
4. Chesmore, D. (2004) Automated bioacoustic identification of species. Anais da Academia Brasileirade Ciencias, 76: 436-440.
5. Do, M.T., Harp, J.M. and Norris, K.C. (1999) A test of pattern recognition system for spiders. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 89: 217-224.
6. Gaston, K.J. and O’Neill, M.A. (2004) Automated image recognition: why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 359: 655-667.
7. Gauld, I.D., O’Neill, M.A. and Gaston, K.J. (2000) Driving Miss Daisy: the performance of an automated insect identification system. In Hymenoptera: Evolution, Biodiversity and Biological Control (eds A.D. Austin and M. Dowton), CSIRO, Canberra, pp. 303-312.
8. Janzen, D.H. (2004) Now is the time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 359: 731-732.
9. Kohonen, T. (2001) Self-Organising Maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences, 3rd edition, volume 30, Springer, Berlin, 501 pp.
10. Lane, R.P. (1981) Allometry in size in three species of biting midges (Diptera, Cerotopogonidae, Culicoides). Journal of Natural History, 15: 775-788.
11. Lucas, S.M. (1997) Face recognition with the continuous n-tuple classifier. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, 1997 (ed A. Clark). Available online: http://www.bmva.ac.uk/1997/papers/113/paper.html.
12. MacLeod, N., O’Neill, M.A. and Walsh, S.A. (2003) PaleoDAISY: An integrated and adaptive system for the automated recognition of fossil species. The Geological Society of America, Abstracts and Programs, 35: 316.
13. MacLeod, N., O’Neill, M.A. and Walsh, S.A. (2004) A comparison between morphometric and unsupervised, artificial, neural-net approaches to automated species identification in foraminifera. In Proceedings of the Micropalaeontological Society Calcareous Plankton Spring Meeting: Copenhagen, Denmark (eds E. Sheldon, S. Stouge and A. Henderson), Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Ministry of the Environment, GEUS, p. 21.
14. MacLeod, N., O’Neill, M.A. and Walsh. S.A. (in press) A comparison between morphometric and artificial neural net approaches to the automated species-recognition problem in systematics. In Biodiversity Databases: From Cottage Industry to Industrial Network (eds G. Curry and C. Humphries), Taylor & Francis, London.
15. O’Neill, M.A., Burns, G. and Hilgetag, C.-C. (2003) The PUPS-MOSIX environment: a homeostatic environment for neuro-and bio-informatic applications. In Neuroscience Databases, a Practical Guide (ed R. Kötter) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 187-202.
16. O’Neill, M.A. and Curtiss-Rouse, M. (2004) An engineering study for the design of a computational microbot (CMB), Rev. 1.6. Digital Vision Internal Document.
17. O’Neill, M.A. and Hilgetag, C.-C. (2001) The portable UNIX programming system [PUPS]: a computational environment for the dynamical representation and analysis of complex neurobiological data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 356: 1259-1276.
18. Press, W.H., Tuekolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery B.P. (1992) Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Programming, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1020 pp.
19. Richardson, T., Stafford-Fraser, Q., Wood, K.R. and Hopper, A. (1998) Virtual network computing. IEEE Internet Computing 2(1). Available online: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/DTG/attarchive/pub/docs/att/tr.98.1.pdf.
20. Russell, K.N., Do, M.T. and Platnick, N.I. (2005) Introducing SPIDA-web: an automated identification system for biologcial species. Taxonomic Database Working Group Annual Meeting, Abstracts (http://www.tdwg.org/2005meet/paperabstracts/TDWG2005_Abstract_64.htm).
21. Schröder, S., Wittmann, D., Drescher, W., Roth, V., Steinhage, V. and Cremers, A.B. (2002) The new key to bees: automated identification by image analysis of wings. In Pollinating Bees: The Conservation Link between Agriculture and Nature (eds P.G. Kevan and V.L. Imperatriz-Fonseca), Proceedings of the Workshop on Conservation and Sustainable Use of Pollinators in Agriculture, with Emphasis on Bees, S. Paulo, October 1998. Ministry of Environment, Secretariat for Biodiversity and Forests, Brazil, pp. 209-218.
22. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3: 71-86.
23. Walsh, S.A., MacLeod, N. and O’Neill, M.A. (2004) Analysis of spheniscid tarsometatarsus and humerus morphological variability using DAISY automated digital image recognition. In Abstracts of the 6th International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Quillan, pp. 45-46.
24. Watson, A.T. (2005) Automated identification and network analyses in Acacia pollination ecology. Unpublished M.Phil thesis, University of St Andrews.
25. Watson, A.T., O’Neill, M.A. and Kitching, I.J. (2003) A qualitative study investigating automated identification of living macrolepidoptera using the Digital Automated Identification SYstem (DAISY). Systematics & Biodiversity, 1: 287-300.
26. Weeks P.J.D., Gauld, I.D., Gaston K.J. and O’Neill M.A. (1997) Automating the identification of insects: a new solution to an old problem. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 87: 203-211.
27. Weeks, P.J.D., O’Neill, M.A., Gaston K.J. and Gauld, I.D. (1999a) Automating insect identification: exploring the limitations of a prototype system. Journal of Applied Entomology, 123: 1-8.
28. Weeks, P.J.D., O’Neill, M.A., Gaston, K.J. and Gauld, I.D. (1999b) Species identification of wasps using principal component associative memories. Image & Vision Computing, 17: 861-866.
29. Yu, D.S., Kokko, E.G., Barron, J.R., Schaalje, G.B. and Gowen, B.E. (1992) Identification of ichneumonid wasps using image analysis of wings. Systematic Entomology, 17: 389-395.