Estimation of hydromorphological attributes of a small forested catchment by applying the Structure from Motion (SfM) approach

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 69, Issue , 2018, Pages 186-197

  Méndez Barroso, Luis A ^a   Zárate Valdez, Jose L ^b   Robles Morúa, Agustín ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE SONORA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Digital elevation models; LiDAR; Structure from motion (SfM)

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ECOHYDROLOGY; FORESTED CATCHMENT; GPS; LIDAR; STREAMFLOW; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING;

EID: 85048294573     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, K.E., Glenn, N.F., Spaete, L.P., Shinneman, D.J., Pilliod, D.S., Arkle, R.S., McIlroy, S.K., Derryberry, D.R., Methodological considerations of terrestrial laser scanning for vegetation monitoring in the sagebrush steppe. Environ. Monit. Assess., 189(11), 2017, 578.
2. Bishop, M.P., Shroder, J.F., Bonk, R., Olsenholler, J., Geomorphic change in high mountains: a western Himalayan perspective. Global Planet. Change 32:4 (2002), 311–329.
3. Brown, D.E., Biotic Communities: Southwestern United States and Northwestern Mexico. 1994, University of Utah Press, 346.
4. Cohen, S., Willgoose, G., Hancock, G., A methodology for calculating the spatial distribution of the area-slope equation and the hypsometric integral within a catchment. J. Geophys. Res., 113, 1998, 10.1029/2007JF000820.
5. Covino, T., Hydrologic connectivity as a framework for understanding biogeochemical flux through watersheds and along fluvial networks. Geomorphology 277:January (15) (2017), 133–144.
6. Das, S., Pravin-Patel, P., Sengupta, S., Evaluation of Different Digital Elevation Models for Analyzing Drainage Morphometric Parameters in a Mountainous Terrain: a Case of Study of the Supinn-Upper Tons Basin, Indian Himalayas, 5, 2016, SpringerPlus, 1544.
7. Dietrich, J.T., Riverscape mapping with helicopter-based Structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 252 (2016), 144–157.
8. Eltner, A., Mulsow, C., Maas, H.G., Quantitative measurement of soil erosion from TLS and UAV data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XL-1/W2 (2013), 119–124.
9. Entwistle, N.S., Heritage, G.L., An evaluation DEM accuracy acquired using a small unmanned vehicle across a riverine environment. Int. J. New Technol. Res. 3:7 (2017), 43–48.
10. Fernandes, N.F., Dietrich, W.F., Hillslope evolution by diffusive processes: the timescale for equilibrium adjustments. Water Resour. Res. 33:6 (1997), 1307–1318.
11. Fonstad, M.A., Dietrich, J.T., Courville, B.C., Jensen, J.L., Carbonneau, P.E., Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 38:4 (2013), 421–430.
12. Gatziolis, D., Lienard, J.F., Vogs, A., Strigui, N.S., 3D tree dimensionality assessment using photogrammetry and small unmanned aerial vehicles. PLoS ONE 10:9 (2015), 1–21.
13. Glira, P., Pfeifer, N., Mandlburger, G., Rigorous strip adjustment of UAV-based laserscanning data including time-dependent correction of trajectory errors. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 82:12 (2016), 945–954.
14. Grussenmeyer, P., Landes, T., Voegtle, T., Ringle, K., Comparison methods of terrestrial laser scanning, photogrammetry and tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings International Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 37:B5 (2008), 213–218.
15. Hengl, T., Evans, I.S., Mathematical and Digital Models of the Land Surface. In Geomorphometry: Concepts, Softwares, Application and Developments in Soil Science. 2009, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 31–64.
16. Jackson, T.J., Moran, M.S., Introduction to the soil moisture experiments 2004 (SMEX04) special issue. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (2008), 301–303.
17. Javernik, L., Brasington, J., Caruso, B., Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology 213 (2014), 166–182.
18. Jenson, S.K., Domingue, J.O., Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 54:11 (1988), 1593–1600.
19. Johnson, K., Nissen, E., Saripalli, S., Arrowsmith, J.R., McGarey, P., Scharer, K., Williams, P., Blisniuk, K., Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion. Geosphere 10:5 (2014), 969–986.
20. Kalacska, M., Chmura, G.L., Lucanus, O., Berube, D., Arroyo-Mora, J.P., Structure from Motion will revolutionize analyses of tidal landscapes. Remote Sens. Environ. 199 (2017), 14–24.
21. Marteau, B., Vericat, D., Gibbins, C., Batalla, R.J., Green, D., Application of Structure-from-motion photogrammetry to river restoration. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 42 (2017), 503–515.
22. Mendez-Barroso, L.A., Integration of Remote Sensing, Field Observations and Modelling for Ecohydrological Studies in Sonora, Mexico.Doctoral Dissertation ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. 2014, UMI 3666241.
23. Mlambo, R., Woodhouse, I., Gerard, F., Anderson, K., Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry with drone data: a low cost method for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forest in developing countries. Forests 8:68 (2017), 1–20.
24. Molina, J.L., Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P., Molina, M.C., Gonzalez Aguilera, D., Espejo, F., Geomatic methods at the service of water resources modeling. J. Hydrol. 509 (2014), 150–162.
25. d'Oleire-Oltmanns, S., Marzolff, I., Peter, K.D., Ries, J., Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sens. 4 (2012), 3390–3416.
26. Picavet, P.L., Suspension pendulaire elliptique. La Revue du cerf-volant. 1912.
27. Smith, M.W., Carrivick, J.L., Hooke, J., Kirby, M.J., Reconstructing flash flood magnitudes using ‘Structure-from-motion’: A rapid assessment tool. J. Hydrol. 519 (2014), 1914–1927.
28. Snavely, N., Seitz, S.N., Szeliski, R., Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vision 80 (2008), 189–210.
29. Strahler, A.N., Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. GSA Bull. 63:11 (1957), 1117–1142.
30. Templeton, R.C., Vivoni, E.R., Mendez-Barroso, L.A., Pierini, N.A., Anderson, C.A., Rango, A., Laliberte, A.S., Scott, R.L., High resolution characterization of Semiarid watershed: implications on evaporation estimates. J. Hydrol. 509 (2014), 306–319.
31. Wallace, L., Lucieer, A., Malenovsky, Z., Turner, D., Vopenka, P., Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: a comparison of airborne laser scanning and structure from motion (SfM) point clouds. Forests 7:62 (2016), 1–16.
32. Westoby, M.J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N.F., Hambrey, M.J., Reynolds, J.M., Structure-from-motion photogrammetry: a low cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179 (2012), 300–314.
33. Willgoose, G., Hancock, G., Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 23:7 (1998), 611–623.
34. Yunus, A.J.M., Nakagoshi, N., Salleh, K.O., The effects of drainage basin geomorphometry on minimum low flow discharge: the study of small watershed in Kelang River Valley in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Environ. Sci. 15:2 (2003), 149–262.