Trying out mobility as a service: Experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2542, Issue , 2016, Pages 57-64

  Sochor, Jana ^a   Karlsson, I C MariAnne ^a   Strömberg, Helena ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS;

FIELD TRIAL; MOBILITY SERVICE; NEW SERVICES; OPERATIONAL TEST; SERVICE ATTRIBUTES; SERVICE EXPERIENCE; SMART PROJECTS; SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR; URBAN TRAVELS;

SURVEYS;

EID: 85047888974     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2542-07     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hietanen, S. ‘Mobility as a Service’—The New Transport Model? ITS & Transport Management Supplement. Eurotransport, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2014, pp. 2–4. http://www.itsineurope.com/its10/media/press_clippings/ITS%20Supp_et214.pdf. Accessed Aug. 1, 2015.
2. Wikipedia. Mobility as a Service (Transport). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobility_as_a_service:%28transport%29. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
3. The European Mobility as a Service Alliance. http://maas-alliance.eu/. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
4. Jakobsson, C., S. Fuji, and T. Gärling. Effects of Economic Disincentives on Private Car Use. Transportation, Vol. 29, 2002, pp. 349–370.
5. Anable, J., A. Kirkbride, L. Sloman, C. Newson, S. Cairns, and P. Goodwin. Smarter Choices—Changing the Way We Travel. Department for Transport, London, 2004. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1224/1/1224.pdf. Accessed Aug. 1, 2015.
6. Katzev, R. Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 65–86.
7. Das, S., X. Sun, and A. Dutta. Investigating User Ridership Sentiments for Bike Sharing Programs. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 5, 2015, pp. 69–75.
8. Nikitas, A., P. Wallgren, and O. Rexfelt. The Paradox of Public Acceptance of Bike Sharing in Gothenburg. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Engineering Sustainability, ICE Publishing, London, 2015, pp. 1–13.
9. Lindholmen Science Park. Go:Smart Project. http://closer.lindholmen.se/en/about-closer/gosmart. Accessed July 30, 2014.
10. Heikkilä, S. Mobility as a Service—A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration. Case Helsinki. MS thesis. Aalto University, Aalto, Finland, 2014.
11. van Audenhove, F. J., L. Dauby, O. Korniichuk, and J. Pourbaix. The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow. Arthur D. Little, Boston, Mass., 2014.
12. Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.
13. Shaheen, S. A., A. P. Cohen, and M. S. Chung. North American Carsharing 10-Year Retrospective. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2110, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 25–44.
14. Shaheen, S. A., A. P. Cohen, and E. W. Martin. Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator Understanding and Emerging Trends. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2387, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 83–92.
15. Shaheen, S. A., and A. P. Cohen. Growth in Worldwide Carsharing: An International Comparison. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 81–89.
16. Anable, J., B. Lane, and T. Kelay. A Review of Public Attitudes to Climate Change and Transport: Summary Report. Department for Transport, London, 2006. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dft.gov.uk/adobepdf/163944/A_review_of_public_attitude1.pdf. Accessed Aug. 1, 2015.
17. Sochor, J., H. Strömberg, and I. C. M. Karlsson. Travelers’ Motives for Adopting a New, Innovative Travel Service: Insights from the UbiGo Field Operational Test in Gothenburg, Sweden. Presented at 21st World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Detroit, Mich., 2014.
18. City of Gothenburg. Statistik Göteborg (Gothenburg Statistics). http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/G-info/statistik.nsf. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
19. Trafikverket (Swedish Transportation Administration). http://www.trafikverket.se. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
20. Sunfleet. http://www.sunfleet.com. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
21. Move About. http://www.moveabout.se. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
22. Göteborgs Bilkooperativ (Gothenburg’s Car Cooperative). http://www.goteborgsbilkoop.se. Accessed Nov. 15, 2015.
23. Sochor, J., H. Strömberg, and I. C. M. Karlsson. Implementing Mobility as a Service: Challenges in Integrating User, Commercial, and Societal Perspectives. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2536, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 1–9.
24. Sochor, J., H. Strömberg, and I. C. M. Karlsson. An Innovative Mobility Service to Facilitate Changes in Travel Behavior and Mode Choice. Presented at 22nd World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Bordeaux, France, 2015.
25. Resvaneundersökning 2011 Västsvenska Paketet. Technical report. Swedish Transport Administration, Borlänge, Sweden, 2011.
26. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2003.
27. Strömberg, H., O. Rexfelt, I. C. M. Karlsson, and J. Sochor. Trying on Change—Trialability as a Change Moderator for Sustainable Travel Behaviour. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 4, 2016, pp. 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2016.01.002.
28. Cavalieri, S., and G. Pezzotta. Product-Service Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Challenges. Computers in Industry, Vol. 63, 2012, pp. 278–288.
29. Goldstein, S. M., R. Johnston, J. Duffy, and J. Rao. The Service Concept: The Missing Link in Service Design Research? Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, 2002, pp. 121–134.
30. Nordin, F., D. Kindström, C. Kowalkowski, and J. Rehme. The Risks of Providing Services: Differential Risk Effects of the Service—Development Strategies of Customisation, Bundling, and Range. Journal of Service Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2011, pp. 390–408.
31. More, R. Marketing High Profit Product/Service Solutions. Ashgate–Gower, Farnham, United Kingdom, 2013.
32. Cooper, R. G., and E. J. Kleinschmidt. What Makes a New Product a Winner? Success Factors at the Project Level. R&D Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1987, pp. 175–189.
33. Cooper, R. G. The New Product Process: A Decision Guide for Management. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 3, 1988, pp. 238–255.
34. Kotler, P. Kotler on Marketing. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2012.
35. Kotler, P., and K. L. Keller. Marketing Management, 13th ed. Pearson Education International, New York, 2009.
36. Redman, L., M. Friman, T. Gärling, and T. Hartig. Quality Attributes of Public Transport That Attract Car Users: A Research Review. Transport Policy, Vol. 25, 2013, pp. 119–127.
37. Elmore-Yalch, R. TCRP Report 36: A Handbook: Using Market Segmentation to Increase Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
38. Jensen, M. Passion and Heart in Transport—A Sociological Analysis on Transport Behaviour. Transport Policy, Vol. 6, 1999, pp. 19–33.
39. Anable, J. “Complacent Car Addicts” or “Aspiring Environmentalists”? Identifying Travel Behaviour Segments Using Attitude Theory. Transport Policy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2005, pp. 65–78.