From guideline to practice: New shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society

CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 246-249

  Volk, Robert J ^a   Leal, Viola B ^a   Jacobs, Lianne E ^a   Wolf, Andrew M D ^b   Brooks, Durado D ^c   Wender, Richard C ^c,d   Smith, Robert A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

^d THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; HEALTH STATUS; HIGH SENSITIVITY GUAIAC BASED FECAL OCCULT BLOOD TEST; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTITARGET STOOL DNA TEST; NOTE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POPULATION RISK; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHARED DECISION MAKING; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 85047744065     PISSN: 00079235     EISSN: 15424863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21459     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:000-000.
2. DeBourcy AC, Lichtenberger S, Felton S, Butterfield KT, Ahnen DJ, Denberg TD. Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:169-174.
3. Hawley ST, Volk RJ, Krishnamurthy P, Jibaja-Weiss M, Vernon SW, Kneuper S. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Med Care. 2008;46(9 suppl 1):S10-S16.
4. Pignone M, Bucholtz D, Harris R. Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:432-437.
5. Wolf RL, Basch CE, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Shea S. Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:809-811.
6. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:668-676.
7. Schroy PC 3rd, Emmons K, Peters E, et al. The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:93-107.
8. Holden DJ, Harris R, Porterfield DS, et al. Enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010;190:1-195.
9. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780-781.
10. Reuland DS, Brenner AT, Hoffman R, et al. Effect of combined patient decision aid and patient navigation vs usual care for colorectal cancer screening in a vulnerable patient population: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:967-974.
11. Miller DP Jr, Denizard-Thompson N, Weaver KE, et al. Effect of a digital health intervention on receipt of colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:550-557.
12. Levine MN, Gafni A, Markham B, MacFarlane D. A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:53-58.
13. Stacey D, Legare F, Lyddiatt A, et al. Translating evidence to facilitate shared decision making: development and usability of a consult decision aid prototype. Patient. 2016;9:571-582.
14. Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435-441.
15. Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, et al. Helping patients make informed choices: a randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:581-587.
16. Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [serial online]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
17. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531-535.
18. Schwartz B. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. Revised Edition. New York: Ecco; 2016.
19. Jones RM, Vernon SW, Woolf SH. Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:2821-2825.
20. Griffith JM, Lewis CL, Brenner AR, Pignone MP. The effect of offering different numbers of colorectal cancer screening test options in a decision aid: a pilot randomized trial [serial online]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:4.
21. Inadomi JM, Vijan S, Janz NK, et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:575-582.
22. Schoenborn NL, Lee K, Pollack CE, et al. Older adults' views and communication preferences about cancer screening cessation. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1121-1128.
23. Schonberg MA, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Development and evaluation of a decision aid on mammography screening for women 75 years and older. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:417-424.