Same-sex marriage and the constitution

Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 1-221

  Gerstmann, Evan ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047713976     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316795798     Document Type: Book

References (94)

1. www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trump-says-he-s-fine-gay-marriage-60-minutes-interview-n683606.
2. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-picks-colo-appeals-court-judge-neil-gorsuch-for-supreme-court/20I7/0I/3I/2b08a226-e55e-IIe6-a547-5fb94IId332c_story.html?utm_term=.3I29I8474d0f.
3. http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/US-amicus-brief-SCt-same-sex-marriage-3-6-15.pdf.
4. Andrew Koppelman, “Forum: Sexuality and the Possibility of Same-Sex Marriage: Is Mar-riagelnherentlyHeterosexual?” American Journal of Jurisprudence 42 (1997): 51-95, 51.
5. Andrew Koppelman, “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: II Sex, Law, and Equality: Three Arguments for Gay Rights.” Michigan Law Review 95(1997): 1636-1667, 1639.
6. Elizabeth Mehren, “More Backlash Than Bliss 1 Year after Marriage Law,” Los Angeles Times (May 17, 2005), Ai.
7. Marc Santoro, “Spritzer’s Opinion Mixed on Status of Gay Marriage,” New York Times (March 4, 2004), Ai.
8. Robert Egelko, “Top State Court Voids San Francisco’s Gay Marriages,” San Francisco Chronicle (August 13, 2004), Ai.
9. Connor Friedersdorf, “Hillary Clinton’s Gay Marriage Problem,” The Atlantic Monthly (June 13, 2014).
10. Zeke Miller, “Obama Says He Didn’t Mislead on Gay Marriage,” Time (February 11, 2015).
11. www.nytimes.com/2009/05/07/us/07marriage.html.
12. Andrew Koppelman, “Why Gay Legal History Matters” (book review). Harvard Law Review 113 (June 2000): 2035-2060, 2046.
13. Gerald Gunther, “Forward: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection.” Harvard Law Review 86 (1972): 1-48, 8.
14. Louis Lusky, “Footnote Redux: A Caroline Products Reminiscence.” Columbia Law Review 82(1982): 1093-1105.
15. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 1063-1080
16. Pamela S. Katz, “The Case for Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage.” Journal of Law and Policy 8 (1999): 61-106, 65
17. Alan Wolfe, “The Homosexual Exception,” New York Times (February 8, 1998), 46.
18. David Chambers, “What If? The Legal Consequences of Marriage and the Legal Needs of Lesbian and Gay Male Couples.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1996): 447-491
19. Arthur Leonard, “The Case for Same Sex Marriage” (book review). Cornell Law Review 82 (1997): 572-593, 572.
20. Oliver Wendell Holmes, in “The Path of the Law after One Hundred Years: The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 991-1009
21. Ellen C. Perrin and Benjamin S. Siegel, “Technical Report: Promoting the Well-Being of Children Whose Parents Are Gay or Lesbian,” American Academy of Pediatrics (2013). http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/131/4-1374.
22. Rich Barlow, BUToday, “Gay Parents as Good as Straight Ones” (April 11, 2013) (quoting Dr. Benjamin Siegel).
23. M. V. Lee Badgett, “Will Providing Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples Undermine Heterosexual Marriage?” Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC 1 (2004): 1-10.
24. Marcus Dillender, “The Death of Marriage? The Effects of New Forms of Legal Recognition on Marriage Rates in the United States,” 51 Demography 563 (2014).
25. Gary Gates, “LGBT Parenting in the United States,” The Williams Institute (February 2013)
26. Tavia Simmons and Martin O’Connell, “Married Couple and Unmarried Partner Households 2000” (US Census Bureau 2003).
27. G. Sydney Buchanan, “Same-Sex Marriage: The Linchpin Issue.” University of Dayton Law Review 10 (1985): 541-573, 568.
28. Andrew Koppelman’s “Why Discrimination against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex Discrimination.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 197-287.
29. Mark Fajer, “Can Two Real Men Eat Quiche Together? Storytelling, Gender Stereotypes and Legal Protection for Gays and Lesbians.” University of Miami Law Review 46 (1992): 511-615
30. Sylvia A. Law, “Homosexuality and the Social Meaning of Gender.” Wisconsin Law Review 1998 (1988): 187-235
31. Theodore A. Schroeder, “Fables of the Reconstruction: The Practical Failures of Gay and Lesbian Theory in the Realm of Employment Discrimination.” Journal of Gender in the Law 6 (Spring 1998): 333-367.
32. Lynn Wardle, “A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for Same-Sex Marriage.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1996 (1996): 1-101, 86.
33. Myrdal Gunnar, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper, 1944, at 606
34. Sylvia A. Law, “Homosexuality and the Social Meaning of Gender.” University of Wisconsin Law Review 1998 (1998): 187-235, 196.
35. Andrew Koppelman, “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: Sex, Law, Equality: Three Arguments for Gay Rights,” 1636-1667, 1662.
36. Andrew Koppelman, “Why Discrimination against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex Discrimination,” 197-287, 199.
37. Coolidge, C. “Same-Sex Marriage? Baehr v. Miike and the Meaning of Marriage.” Southern Texas Law Review 38 (March 1997): 1-119,33.
38. Catherine A. MacKinnon, “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination.” In Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations, D. Kelly Weinberg, ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993, 276-287.
39. R. M. Puhl, T. Andreyeva, and K. D. Brownell, “Perceptions of Weight Discrimination: Prevalence and Comparison to Race and Gender Discrimination in America.” International Journal of Obesity 32 (2008): 992-1000.
40. Gordon Allport, The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979, at 430.
41. “Gay Rights, Thick and Thin.” Stanford Law Review 49 (November 1996): 45-110, 82.
42. Andrew Koppelman, “Why Discrimination against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex Discrimination” (emphasis added).
43. Toni M. Massaro, “Gay Rights, Thick and Thin.” Stanford Law Review 49 (November 1996): 45-110, 83.
44. William Rubenstein (ed.), Lesbians, Gay Men and the Law. New York: New Press, 1993, at 87-88.
45. Linda Kerber, “A Constitutional Right to Be Treated Like American Ladies.” In US History as Women’s History, Linda Kerber, Alice Kessler-Harris, and Kathryn Kish Sklar, eds. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995, at 20-21.
46. Craig M. Bradley, “The Right Not to Endorse Gay Rights: A Reply to Sunstein.” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 29-38, 32-33.
47. David A. Coolidge, “Same-Sex Marriage? Baehr v. Miike and the Meaning of Marriage.” Southwest Texas Law Review 38 (March 1997): 1-97, 24.
48. Otis R. Damslet, “Note: Same-Sex Marriage.” New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 10 (1993): 555, 563-565 n.37.
49. Keith E. Whittington, Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1999.
50. Lynn D. Wardle, “Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790-1990.” Howard Law Journal 41 (Winter 1998): 289-347, 291.
51. Benjamin R. Twiss, Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez-Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1942, at 18-173
52. Edward S. Corwin, Liberty against Government: The Rise, Flowering and Decline of a Famous Juridical Concept. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1948, at 129-152.
53. David P. Courrie, The Constitution and the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
54. Bruce Ackerman, “Beyond Carolene Products.” Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 713-746,713-714.
55. Lynn D. Wardle, “Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790-1990.” Howard Law Journal 41 (Winter 1998): 289-347, 332.
56. Mark V. Tushnet, “Two Notes on the Jurisprudence of Privacy,” reporting that Justice Douglas’s opinion in Griswold “is widely regarded among law professors as fatally flawed.” Constitutional Commentary 8 (1991): 75-86, 75.
57. Mark Strasser, The Challenge of Same-Sex Marriage: Federalist Principles and Constitutional Protections. Connecticut: Praeger, 1999, at 42
58. Noah Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language 66 (1828) (6th ed. 1989).
59. John Stuart Mill, “The Subjection of Women.” In Essays on Sex Equality, Alice S. Rossi, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970, at 137.
60. Joanna L. Grossman and Lawrence M. Friedman, “Is Three Still a Crowd? Polygamy and the Law after Obergefell v. Hodges,” JUSTIA (July 7, 2015), https://verdict.justia.com/2015/07/07/is-three-still-a-crowd-polygamy-andthe-law-after-obergefell-v-hodges
61. Rodney M. Perry, “Obergefell v. Hodges: Same-Sex Marriage Legalized,” Congressional Research Service Report [August 7, 2015] at 2
62. Steven Chapman, “Two’s Company; Three’s a Marriage,” Slate On-Line (June 4, 2001).
63. John Witte Jr., The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy (Cambridge Studies in Law and Christianity 2015) at 428.
64. Stephen Macedo, Just Married: Same-Sex Couples, Monogamy, and the Future of Marriage. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015, at 29.
65. William Eskridge, The Case for Same-Sex Marriage.
66. David Chambers, “Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage,” Hofstra Law Review 26 (1996): 53-83, 66-67 (citations omitted).
67. Julie Roy Jeffrey, Frontier Women: Civilizing the West? 1840-1880. New York: Hill and Wang, 1998.
68. B. J. Wray, Keith Reimer, and Craig Cameron, “The Most Comprehensive Judicial Record Ever Produced: The Polygamy Reference.” Emory Law Journal 64 (2015): 1877-1902, 1895.
69. L. Jaber, G. Halpern, and M. Shohot, “The Impact of Consanguinity Worldwide.” Community Genetics 1 (1998): 12-17.
70. Judith Herman, Diana Russell, and Karen Trocki, “Long-Term Effects of Incestuous Abuse in Childhood.” American Journal of Psychiatry 143 (1986): 1293-1296
71. John HartEly, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980
72. Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.
73. Peter G. Colby and Thomas Smith, “The Return of Lochner.” Cornell Law Review 100 (2015): 527-602.
74. D. Scott Broyles, “Doubting Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas’s Effort to Resurrect the Privileges or Immunities Clause.” Indiana Law Review 46 (2013): 341-385.
75. Robert Bork, “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (Fall 1971): 1-35, 6.
76. “Stare Decisis,” Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York 4 (1949): 152, 153-54.
77. Alexander Bickel, The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
78. Tushnet, T. “And Only Wealth Will Bring You Justice - Some Notes on the Supreme Court. 1972 Term.” Wisconsin Law Review 1974 (1974): 177-197.
79. Gwynne Skinner, “Misunderstood, Misconstrued, and Now Clearly Dead: The ‘Political Question Doctrine’ as a Justiciability Doctrine,” Journal of Law & Politics 29 (Spring 2014): 427-480.
80. Robert Bork, “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (Fall 1971): 1-35, 6.
81. “Stare Decisis,” Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York 4 (1949): 152, 153-54.
82. Alexander Bickel, The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
83. Gwynne Skinner, “Misunderstood, Misconstrued, and Now Clearly Dead: The ‘Political Question Doctrine’ as a Justiciability Doctrine,” Journal of Law & Politics 29 (Spring 2014): 427-480.
84. “Hawaiian Aye: Nearing the Altar on Gay Marriage.” In Same-Sex Marriage, Robert Baird and Stuart Rosenbaum, eds. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books, 1997.
85. Gerald Rosenberg, “The Road Taken: Robert Dahl’s Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Emory Law Journal 50 (2001): 613-630.
86. “Maybe Same-Sex Marriage Didn’t Make the Difference,” New York Times (November 7, 2004).
87. “Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (2005): 201-209, 201.
88. “Truth in Numbers; Moral Values and the Gay Marriage Backlash Did Not Help Bush,” Boston Review (February/March 2005)
89. James W. Stoutenborough, Donald P. Haider-Markel, and Mahalley D. Allen, “Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion: Gay Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2006): 419-433.
90. William N. Eskridge Jr., “Backlash Politics: How Constitutional Litigation Has Advanced Marriage Equality in the United States,” Boston University Law Review 93 (2013): 275-323
91. Linda Greenhouse and Reva B. Siegel, “Backlash to the Future? From Roe to Perry,” UCLA Law Review Disc. 60 (2013): 240-246.
92. “National Briefing I South: Alabama: Same-Sex Marriage Ban Advances,” New York Times (March 11, 2005).
93. NeJaime, Doug, and Riva B. Siegel, “Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics,” Yale Law Journal 124 (2015): 2516-2591.
94. Corbin, Caroline M., “Speech or Conduct? The Free Speech Claims of Wedding Vendors,” Emory Law Journal 65 (2015): 241-302.