A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

The bone & joint journal

Volumn 97-B, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-63

  Abane, L ^a   Anract, P ^a   Boisgard, S ^a   Descamps, S ^a   Courpied, J P ^a   Hamadouche, M ^a  

^a Université Paris 5 ^*  (France)

Author keywords

alignment; conventional; cutting guides; instrumentation; Knee arthroplasty; patient specific

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85047699434     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34440     Document Type: Article

References (0)