Susceptibility pattern and development of resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L, to Bacillus thuringiensis berl var kurstaki in India

Pest Management Science

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 189-194

  Mohan, Muthugounder ^a   Gujar, Govind T ^a  

^a INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki; Development of resistance; Diamondback moth; Plutella xylostella; Susceptibility pattern

Indexed keywords

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS TOXIN;

BIOPESTICIDE; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE;

ARTICLE; BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; BIOASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; INDIA; INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE; LARVA; MOTH;

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; LEPIDOPTERA; PLUTELLA XYLOSTELLA; PLUTELLIDAE;

EID: 85047698739     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1526-4998(200002)56:2<189::AID-PS95>3.3.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Höfte H and Whiteley HR, Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis. Microbiol Rev 53:242-255 (1989).
2. Yamamoto T, Gracia JA and Dulmage HT, Immunological properties of entomocidal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis and its insecticidal activity. J Invert Pathol 41:122-130 (1983).
3. Jaquet F, Hütter R and Lüthy P, Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:500-504 (1987).
4. Entwistle PF, Cory JS, Bailey MJ and Higgs S, Bacillus thuringiensis, An environmental biopesticide: Theory and Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England (1993).
5. Haider MZ, Knowles BH and Ellar DJ, Specificity of a Bacillus thuringiensis var Colmeri insecticidal delta-endotoxin by differential processing of the protoxin by larval gut proteases. Eur J Biochem. 156:531-540 (1986).
6. Hofman C, Vanderbruggen H, Höfte H, van Rie VJ, Jansens S and van Mellaert HV, Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7844-7848 (1988).
7. Tabashnik BE, Liu YB, Malvar T, Heckel DG, Masson L, Ballester V, Granero F, Ménsua JL and Ferré J, Global variation in the genetic and biochemical basis of diamondback moth resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12780-12785 (1997).
8. Beegle CC and Yamamoto T, History of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, research and development. Can Entomol. 124:587-616 (1992).
9. Tabashnik BE, Evaluation of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:47-49 (1994).
10. Talekar NS, Management of Diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. Proc 2nd Int workshop. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan (1992).
11. Georghiou GP and Tajeda LA, The occurrence of resistance to pesticides in arthropods. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome (1991).
12. Tabashnik BE, Cushing NL, Finson N and Johnson MW, Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 83:1671-1676 (1990).
13. Shelton AM, Robertson JL, Tang JD, Perez C, Eigenbrode SD, Preisler HK, Wisley WT and Cooley RJ, Resistance of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies in the field. J Econ Entomol 86:697-705 (1993).
14. Hama H, Suzuki K and Tanaka H, Inheritance and stability of resistance to B thuringiensis formulations of the diamondback moth P xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Appl Entomol Zool 27:355-362 (1992).
15. Ferré J, Real MD, van Rie J, Jansens S and Peferoen M, Resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field population of Plutella xylostella is due to a change in a midgut membrane receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:5119-5123 (1991).
16. Syed AR, Insecticide resistance in diamondback moth in Malaysia, in Management of Diamondback moth and other crucifer pests. Proc 2nd Int Workshop ed by Talekar NS, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Taiwan, pp 437-442 (1992).
17. Zhao J-z, Zhu G-r, Ju Z-l and Wang W-z, Resistance of diamondback moth to Bacillus thuringiensis in China. Resistant Pest Management 5(2): 11-12 (1993).
18. Atwal AS and Singh K, Comparative efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner and some contact insecticides against Pieris brassicae L and Plutella maculipennis (Curtis) on cauliflower. Indian J Ent 31:361-363 (1969).
19. Chandrasekaran J, Regupathy A, Bhuvaneswari K and Balasubramani V, Biological evaluation of carbosulfan and Biobit (B.T.K.) for the control of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (L) on cabbage and cauliflower. Pestology 18(5): 5-12 (1994).
20. Kulkarni SR, Pawar VM and Mandhare VK, Evaluation of wock. Biological 01 (Halt) against diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L of cabbage. Pestology, 19(9):11-13 (1995).
21. Kumar H and Kapur A, Role of transgenic vegetable crops in insect pest management. A paper presented at National Level Discussion on Critical Issues of Integrated Pest Management in the Changing Agricultural Scenario in India, ed by Bakhetia DRC, Dilawari VK, Singh J and Joia BS. 28-29 Nov 1998. Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India (1998).
22. Gasser CS and Fraley RT, Genetically engineering plants for crop improvement. Science (Washington) 244:1293-1299 (1989).
23. Zehnder GW and Gelernter WD, Activity of the M-ONE formulation of a new strain of Bacillus thuringiensis against the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): relationship between susceptibility and insect life stage. J Econ Entomol 82:756-761 (1989).
24. Tabashnik BE, Finson N and Johnson MW, Managing resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: Lessons from the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 84:49-55 (1991).
25. Ross GJS, Maximum likelihood programme, The Numerical Algorithms Group, Rothamsted Exp Stn, Harpenden, UK (1977).
26. Kinsinger RA and McGaughey WH, Susceptibility of populations of Indian meal moth and almond moth to Bacillus thuringiensis isolates (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Econ Entomol 72:346-349 (1979).
27. Rossiter M, Yendol WG and Dubois ND, Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): genetic and environmental causes. J Econ Entomol 83:2211-2218 (1990).
28. Sannaveerappanavar VT, Studies on insecticide resistance in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and strategies for its management. PhD thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore (1995).
29. Gujar GT and Kalia V, Bioactivity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki and possible development of tolerance (resistance) in some populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. Indian J Entomol, in press (1999).
30. Devriendt M and Martouret D, Absence de resistance Bacillus thuringiensis chez la teignede crucifers Plutella maculipennis (Lep: Yponomeutidae). Entomophaga, 21:189-199 (1976).
31. Krieg A and Langenbruch GA, Susceptibility of arthropod species to Bacillus thuringiensis, in Microbial Control of Pests and Plant Diseases 1970-1980, ed by Burges HD, Academic Press, New York, pp 837-840 (1981).
32. Ballester V, Granero F, Tabashnik BE, Malvar T and Ferré J, Integrative model for binding of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in susceptible and resistant larvae of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1413-1419 (1999).
33. Oppert B, Kramer KJ, Beeman RW, Johnson D and McGaughey WH, Proteinase-mediated insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. J Biol Chem 272:23473-23476 (1997).
34. Forcada C, Alcácer E, Garcerá MD and Martínez R, Differences in the midgut proteolytic activity of two Heliothis virescens strains, one susceptible and one resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 31:257-272 (1996).