Solid-phase synthesis of homogeneous ruthenium catalysts on silica for the continuous asymmetric transfer hydrogenation reaction

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1202-1208

  Sandee, Albertus J ^a   Petra, Daniëlle G I ^a   Reek, Joost N H ^a   Kamer, Paul C J ^a   Van Leeuwen, Piet W N M ^a  

^a Institute of Molecular Chemistry   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Asymmetric catalysis; Hydrogen transfer; Immobilization; Ruthenium; Solid phase synthesis

Indexed keywords

CATALYST ACTIVITY; HYDROGENATION; RUTHENIUM COMPOUNDS; SILICA;

SOLID-PHASE SYNTHESIS;

SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ACETOPHENONE; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; NOREPHEDRINE; RUTHENIUM; RUTHENIUM DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; COVALENT BOND; ENANTIOMER; HYDROGENATION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 85047698439     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. R. Noyori, Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1994, 2.
2. a) S. Hashiguchi, A. Fujii, J. Takehara, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7562;
3. b) A. Fujii, S. Hashiguchi, N. Uematsu, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2521.
4. a) G. Zassinovich, G. Mestroni, S. Gladiali, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1051;
5. b) D. A. Alonso, B. Brandt, S. J. M. Nordin, P. G. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9580
6. c) D. G. I. Petra, J. N. H. Reek, J.-W. Handgraaf, E. J. Meijer, P. Dierkes, P. C. J. Kamer, J. Brussee, H. E. Schoemaker, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2812;
7. d) M. Yamakawa, H. Ito, R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1466.
8. a) J. Takehara, S. Hashiguchi, A. Fujii, I. Shin-ichi, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Chem. Commun. 1996, 233;
9. b) M. Palmer, T. Walsgrove, M. Wills, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5226;
10. c) D. A. Alonso, D. Guijarro, P. Pinho, O. Temme, P. G. Anderson, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2749.
11. D. G. I. Petra, P. C. J. Kamer, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, K. Goubitz, A. M. van Loon, J. G. de Vries, H. E. Schoemaker, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 12, 2335.
12. T. Bein, Current Opinion in Solid State & Material Science, 1999, 4, 85.
13. a) E. Breysse, C. Pinel, M. Lemaire, Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1998, 9, 897;
14. b) D. J. Bayston, C. B. Travers, M. E. C. Polywka, Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2015.
15. P. Gamez, F. Fache, M. Lemaire, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1994, 131, 600.
16. A. Adima, J. J. E. Moreau, M. W. C. Man, J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 2331.
17. At a ligand to metal ratio of 1, the catalyst becomes slightly less efficient.
18. Small amounts of water also do not effect the catalyst performance.
19. This poisoning was clearly observed by NMR and TLC techniques. A slow decomposition of NH-benzylated norephedrine on refluxing in toluene takes place in the presence of dimethyldimethoxysilane.
20. D. Brunel, N. Bellocq, P. Sutra, A Cauvel, M. Laspéras, P. Moreau, F. Di Renzo, A. Galarneau, F. Fajula, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 179, 1085.
21. Contact with air is avoided in all catalytic experiments as it gives rise to a rapid decomposition of the catalyst.
22. R. Noyori, S. Hashiguchi, Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97.
23. K.-J. Haack, S. Hashiguchi, A. Fujii, T. Ikariya, R. Noyori, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 297;
24. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 285.
25. -1.
26. T. Bein, Curr. Opinion Solid State & Mater. Sci. 1999, 4, 85.
27. P.-P. Knops-Gerrits, D. De Vos, F. Thibault-Starzyk, P. A. Jacobs, Nature 1994, 369, 543.
28. K. J. Balkus, Jr., M. Eissa, R. Levado, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10753.
29. R. Grubbs, C. P. Lau, R. Cukier, C. Brubaker, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4517.
30. B. Pugin, J. Mol. Catal. 1996, 107, 273.
31. K. Mashima, T. Hino, H. Takaya, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3101.
32. A. E. S. Gelpke, H. Kooijman, A. L. Spek, H. Hiemstra, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2472.
33. For a rapid screening technique developed for the transfer hydrogenation reaction see: D. G. I. Petra, J. N. H. Reek, P. C. J. Kamer, H. E. Schoemaker, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, Chem. Commun. 2000, 683.
34. a) G. Lin, J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7712;
35. b) B. M. Cole, K. D. Shimizu, C. A. Krueger, J. P. A. Harrity, M. L. Snapper, A. H. Hoveyda, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1776;
36. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1668;
37. c) K. D. Shimizu, B. M. Cole, C. A. Krueger, K. W. Kuntz, M. L. Snapper, A. H. Hoveyda, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1781;
38. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1704;
39. d) A. M. Porte, J. Reibenspies, K. Burgess, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9180;
40. e) S. J. Taylor, J. P. Morken, Science, 1998, 280, 267;
41. f) R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Commun. 1999, 1611;
42. g) R. H. Crabtree, CHEMTECH, 1999, 21;
43. h) M. B. Francis, E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 987;
44. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 937.
45. a) A. Holzwarth, H.-W. Schmidt, W. F. Maier, Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2788;
46. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2644;
47. b) B. Jandeleit, D. J. Schaefer, T. S. Powers, H. W. Turner, W. H. Weinberg, Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2648;
48. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2494.
49. A comparable effect was previously reported in ref. [9]. In this reference, however, a comparison was made between the homogeneous catalyzed reaction at 95% conversion (after a reaction of five days) and the heterogenized analogue at lower conversion. At 95% conversion, the reverse reaction becomes significant and will be favored for the enantiomer formed in excess, hereby decreasing the overall ee.