Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1898-1905

  Kwak, Jae Young ^a   Kim, Jae Seung ^a   Kim, Hye Jin ^a   Ha, Hyun Kwon ^a   Yu, Chang Sik ^a   Kim, Jin Cheon ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85047697740     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1575-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Cohen AM, Tremiterra S, Candela F et al (1991) Prognosis of node-positive colon cancer. Cancer 67:1859-1861
2. O'Dwyer ST, Haboubi NY, Johnson JS et al (2001) Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 3:288-294
3. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging-a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773-783
4. Heriot AG, Grundy A, Kumar D (1999) Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 86:17-28
5. Shin SS, Jeong YY, Min JJ et al (2008) Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT versus integrated FDG PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 33:270-277
6. Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2006) Efficacy of PET/CT in the accurate evaluation of primary colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:941-947
7. Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Fujii H et al (2006) PET imaging for evaluation of metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver. Eur J Radiol 58:229-235
8. Abdel-Nabi H, Doerr RJ, Lamonica DM et al (1998) Staging of primary colorectal carcinomas with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET: correlation with histopathologic and CT findings. Radiology 206:755-760
9. Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O et al (2003) Routine [18]FFDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making. J Nucl Med 44:1784-1788
10. Bar-Shalom R, Yefremov N, Guralnik L et al (2003) Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. J Nucl Med 44:1200-1209
11. Ell PJ (2006) The contribution of PET/CT to improved patient management. Br J Radiol 79:32-36
12. Cohade C, Osman M, Leal J et al (2003) Direct comparison of [18]F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 44:1797-1803
13. Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P et al (2004) Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg 240:1027-1034 discussion 1035-1026
14. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2006) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. Kanehara, Tokyo
15. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H et al (2004) Accuracy of wholebody dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDGPET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357-4368
16. Niekel MC, Bipat S, Stoker J (2010) Diagnostic imaging of colorectal liver metastases with CT, MR imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis of prospective studies including patients who have not previously undergone treatment. Radiology 257:674-684
17. Avril N (2004) GLUT1 expression in tissue and [18]F-FDG uptake. J Nucl Med 45:930-932
18. Inoue K, Sato T, Kitamura H et al (2008) Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG-PET/CT by optimizing the iteration number for the image reconstruction. Ann Nucl Med 22:465-473
19. Dukes CE, Bussey HJ (1958) The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 12:309-320
20. Hermanek P, Altendorf A (1981) Classification of colorectal carcinomas with regional lymphatic metastases. Pathol Res Pract 173:1-11
21. Kim JS, Sohn DK, Park JW et al (2011) Prognostic significance of distribution of lymph node metastasis in advanced mid or low rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 104:486-492
22. Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T et al (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1663-1672
23. Di Matteo G, Mascagni D, Tarroni D (1991) Radical surgery for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol Suppl 2:32-35
24. Leggeri A, Roseano M, Balani A et al (1994) Lumboaortic and iliac lymphadenectomy: what is the role today? Dis Colon Rectum 37:S54-S61
25. Hojo K, Sawada T, Moriya Y (1989) An analysis of survival and voiding, sexual function after wide iliopelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum, compared with conventional lymphadenectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 32:128-133
26. Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW (2007) PET/CT: form and function. Radiology 242:360-385
27. 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Am J Surg 178:282-287
28. Desai DC, Zervos EE, Arnold MW et al (2003) Positron emission tomography affects surgical management in recurrent colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 10:59-64
29. Truant S, Huglo D, Hebbar M et al (2005) Prospective evaluation of the impact of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography of resectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 92:362-369
30. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF et al (2003) Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 348:2500-2507
31. Flamen P, Stroobants S, Van Cutsem E et al (1999) Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D- glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:894-901
32. Chowdhury FU, Shah N, Scarsbrook AF et al (2010) [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging of colorectal cancer: a pictorial review. Postgrad Med J 86:174-182
33. Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB et al (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896-2900
34. Goldstein NS (2002) Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol 26:179-189
35. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912-2919
36. Pusztaszeri M, Matter M, Kuonen A et al (2009) Nodal staging in colorectal cancer: should distant lymph nodes be recovered in surgical specimens? Hum Pathol 40:552-557
37. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y et al (2007) Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96:1030-1036
38. McDaniel KP, Charnsangavej C, DuBrow RA et al (1993) Pathways of nodal metastasis in carcinomas of the cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon: CT demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:61-64
39. Granfield CA, Charnsangavej C, Dubrow RA et al (1992) Regional lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the left side of the colon and rectum: CT demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:757-761
40. Pomerri F, Maretto I, Pucciarelli S et al (2009) Prediction of rectal lymph node metastasis by pelvic computed tomography measurement. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:168-173
41. Dighe S, Swift I, Brown G (2008) CT staging of colon cancer. Clin Radiol 63:1372-1379
42. Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM et al (2010) A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:310-320