Estimating Time to Contact and Impact Velocity When Catching an Accelerating Object With the Hand

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 219-237

  Senot, Patrice ^a,b   Prévost, Pascal ^a   McIntyre, Joseph ^a  

^a Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ARM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 85047694690     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.219     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bennis, N., Roby-Brami, A., Dufosse, M., & Bussel, B. (1996). Anticipatory responses to a self-applied load in normal subjects and hemiparetic patients. Journal of Physiology (Paris), 90, 27-42.
2. Bootsma, R. J., Fayt, V., Zaal, F. T., & Laurent, M. (1997). On the information-based regulation of movement: What Wann (1996) may want to consider. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1282-1289.
3. Bootsma, R. J., & Oudejans, R. R. (1993). Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1041-1052.
4. Bootsma, R. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. (1990). Visual control of an attacking forehand drive in table tennis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 21-29.
5. Brouwer, A., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. (2002). Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: Can acceleration be used in inception? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1160-1168.
6. Cavallo, V., & Laurent, M. (1988). Visual information and skill level in time-to-collision estimation. Perception, 17, 623-632.
7. DeLucia, P. R., & Liddell, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 901-914.
8. DeLucia, P. R., & Meyer, L. E. (1999). Judgments about the time-to-contact between two objects during simulated self motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1813-1833.
9. DeLucia, P. R., & Novak, J. B. (1997). Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 913-928.
10. DeLucia, P. R., Tresilian, J. R., & Meyer, L. E. (2000). Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 552-567.
11. DeLucia, P. R., & Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 783-798.
12. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126-132.
13. Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., & Carey, D. P. (1991, January 10). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature, 349, 154-156.
14. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
15. Gottsdanker, R. M. (1952). The accuracy of prediction motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 26-36.
16. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (1998). Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research, 38, 499-512.
17. Hecht, H., Kaiser, M. K., & Banks, M. S. (1996). Gravitational acceleration as a cue for absolute size and distance? Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1066-1075,
18. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory and Cognition, 18, 299-309.
19. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin Review and Review, 2, 322-338.
20. Jagacinski, R. J., Johnson, W. W., & Miller, R. A. (1983). Quantifying the cognitive trajectories of extrapolated movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 43-57.
21. Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1988). Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 59-71.
22. Kaiser, M. K., Jonides, J., & Alexander, J. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory and Cognition, 14, 308-312.
23. Kaiser, M. K., & Phatak, A. V. (1993). Things that go bump in the light: On the optical specification of contact severity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 194-202.
24. Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., & McCloskey, M. (1985). The development of beliefs about falling objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 533-539.
25. Lacquaniti, F., Borghese, N. A., & Carrozzo, M. (1993). Time-varying mechanical behavior of multi-joint arm in man. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1443-1464.
26. Lacquaniti, F., Carrozzo, M., & Borghese, N. A. (1993). The role of vision in tuning anticipatory motor responses of the limbs. In A. Berthoz (Ed.). Multisensory control of movement (pp. 379-393). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989a). Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 149-159.
28. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989b). The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 134-148.
29. Lang, C. E., & Bastian, A., J. (1999). Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82, 2108-2119.
30. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
31. Lee, D. N., & Reddish, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics. Nature, 293, 293-294.
32. Lee, D. N., van der Weel, F. R., Hitchcock, T., Matejowsky, E., & Pettigrew, J. D. (1992). Common principle of guidance by echolocation and vision. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 171, 563-571.
33. Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S., & Clayton, T. M. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 333-346.
34. McCloskey, M., & Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 146-156.
35. McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 636-649.
36. McIntyre, J., Zago, M., Berthoz, A., & Lacquaniti, F. (2001). Does the brain model Newton's laws? Nature Neuroscience, 4, 693-694.
37. McLeod, R. W., & Ross, H. E. (1983). Optic-flow and cognitive factors in time-to-collision estimates. Perception, 12, 417-423.
38. Michaels, C. F., Zeinstra, E. B., & Oudejans, R. R. (2001). Information and action in punching a falling ball. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 69-93.
39. Port, N. L., Lee, D., Dassonville, P., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (1997). Manual interception of moving targets: I. Performance and movement initiation. Experimental Brain Research, 116, 406-420.
40. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1975). Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 395-403.
41. Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and non-natural motion functions. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 261-266.
42. Rushton, S. K., & Wann, J. P. (1999). Weighted combination of size and disparity: A computational model for timing a ball catch. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 186-190.
43. Salenius, S., Portin, K., Kajola, M., Salmelin, R., & Hari, R. (1997). Cortical control of human motoneuron firing during isometric contraction. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3401-3405.
44. Savelsbergh, G. J., Whiting, H. T., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991). Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 315-322.
45. Savelsbergh, G. J., Whiting, H. T., Burden, A. M., & Bartlett, R. M. (1992). The role of predictive visual temporal information in the coordination of muscle activity in catching. Experimental Brain Research, 89, 223-228.
46. Savelsbergh, G. J., Whiting, H. T., Pijpers, J. R., & van Santvoord, A. A. (1993). The visual guidance of catching. Experimental Brain Research, 93, 148-156.
47. Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647-658.
48. Schiff, W., & Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 303-316.
49. Smith, M. R., Flach, J. M., Dittman, S. M., & Stanard, T. (2001). Monocular optical constraints on collision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 395-410.
50. Thorpe, S. J., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Fabre, T., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2001). Detection of animals in natural images using far peripheral vision. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 869-876.
51. Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 795-810.
52. Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865-876.
53. Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-to-contact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 231-245.
54. Tresilian, J. R. (1999). Analysis of recent empirical challenges to an account of interceptive timing. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 515-528.
55. Turrell, Y. N., Li, F. X., & Wing, A. M. (1999). Grip force dynamics in the approach to a collision. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 86-91.
56. Wann, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1031-1048.
57. Werkhoven, P., Snippe, H. P., & Toet, A. (1992). Visual processing of optic acceleration. Vision Research, 32, 2313-2329.
58. Yilmaz, E. H., & Warren, W. H. J. (1995). Visual control of braking: A test of the tau hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 996-1014.