Tolerance: Of mice and men

Journal of Clinical Investigation

Volumn 111, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1819-1821

  Sachs, David H ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOANTIGEN; BUSULFAN; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; ANTIGEN;

ALLOGRAFT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MEMORY CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN GRAFT; T LYMPHOCYTE; VIRUS INFECTION; ALLOTRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL; CROSS REACTION; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY; IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY; IMMUNOLOGY; NOTE; PRIMATE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS; CROSS REACTIONS; HUMANS; IMMUNE TOLERANCE; IMMUNOLOGIC MEMORY; MICE; PRIMATES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; T-LYMPHOCYTES; TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNOLOGY; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 85047693403     PISSN: 00219738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1172/JCI18926     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Cecka, J.M. 1999. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. Clin. Transpl. 1-16.
2. Billingham, R.E., Brent, L., and Medawar, P.B. 1953. Actively acquired tolerance to foreign cells. Nature. 172:603-606.
3. Adams, A.B., et al. 2003. Heterologous immunity provides a potent barrier to transplantation tolerance. J. Clin. Invest. 111:1887-1895. doi:10.1172/JCI200317477.
4. Adams, A.B., et al. 2001. Costimulation blockade, busulfan, and bone marrow promote titratable macrochimerism, induce transplantation tolerance, and correct genetic hemoglobinopathies with minimal myelosuppression. J. Immunol. 167:1103-1111.
5. Welsh, R.M., and Selin, L.K. 2002. No one is naive: the significance of heterologous T-cell immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:417-426.
6. Kawai, T., et al. 1995. Mixed allogeneic chimerism and renal allograft tolerance in cynomolgus monkeys. Transplantation. 59:256-262.
7. Huang, C.A., et al. 2000. Stable mixed chimerism and tolerance using a nonmyeloablative preparative regimen in a large-animal model. J. Clin. Invest. 105:173-181.
8. Spitzer, T.R., et al. 1999. Combined histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-matched donor bone marrow and renal transplantation for multiple myeloma with end stage renal disease: the induction of allograft tolerance through mixed lymphohematopoietic chimerism. Transplantation. 68:480-484.
9. Buhler, L.H., et al. 2002. Induction of kidney allograft tolerance after transient lymphohematopoietic chimerism in patients with multiple myeloma and end-stage renal disease. Transplantation. 74:1405-1409.
10. Russell, P.S., Chase, C.M., Colvin, R.B., and Plate, J.M. 1978. Kidney transplants in mice. An analysis of the immune status of mice beating long-term, H-2 incompatible transplants. J. Exp. Med. 147:1449-1468.
11. Papalois, B.E., et al. 1996. Total lymphoid irradiation, without intrathymic injection of donor cells, induces indefinite acceptance of heart but not islet or skin allografts in rats. Transpl. Int. 9(Suppl. 1):S372-S378.
12. Karim, M., Steger, U., Bushell, A.R., and Wood, K.J. 2002. The role of the graft in establishing tolerance. Front Biosci. 7:e129-e154.
13. Choo, J.K., et al. 1997. Species differences in the expression of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens on coronary artery endothelium: implications for cell-mediated xenoreactivity. Transplantation. 64:1315-1322.
14. Rosengard, B.R., et al. 1992. Induction of specific tolerance to class I disparate renal allografts in miniature swine with cyclosporine. Transplantation. 54:490-497.
15. Yamada, K., et al. 1997. Role of the thymus in transplantation tolerance in miniature swine: I. Requirement of the thymus for rapid and stable induction of tolerance to class I-mismatched renal allografts. J. Exp. Med. 186:497-506.