Evaluation of qualitative research studies

Evidence-Based Nursing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 36-40

  Russell, Cynthia K ^a   Gregory, David M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; SAMPLE SIZE; STANDARD; TERMINAL CARE;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 85047687729     PISSN: 13676539     EISSN: 14689618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ebn.6.2.36     Document Type: Note

References (35)

1. Providers tried to help patients and families make realistic end of life decisions [abstract]. Evidence-Based Nursing 2002;5:64.
2. Norton SA, Bowers BJ. Working toward consensus: providers' strategies to shift patients from curative to palliative treatment choices. Res Nurs Health 2001;24:258-69.
3. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 2000;284:357-62.
4. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. B.What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? JAMA 2000;284:478-82.
5. Thorne S. The art (and science) of critiquing qualitative research. In: Morse JM, editor. Completing a qualitative project: details and dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997:117-32
6. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2002;1(1):Article 5. http://www.ualberta.ca/zijqm/
7. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, et al. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2002;1(2):Article 2. http://www.ualberta.ca/zijqm/
8. Barbour RS. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ 2001;322:1115-17.
9. Forchuk C, Roberts J. How to critique qualitative research articles. Can J Nurs Res 1993;25:47-55.
10. Chapple A, Rogers A. Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism? Fam Prac 1998;15:556-61.
11. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Second edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2000.
12. Grbich C. Qualitative research in health: an introduction. St Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin Publishers, 1998.
13. Munhall P, Oiler-Boyd C. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. Third edition. New York: National League for Nursing, 2001.
14. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Third edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2002.
15. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introduction to qualitative research methods. Third edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1998.
16. Holliday A. Doing and writing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
17. Tesch R. Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press, 1990.
18. Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, et al, editors. Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
19. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.
20. van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: Althouse Press, 1990.
21. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin Publishers, 1998.
22. Kirk J, Miller ML. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1986.
23. Schatzman L, Strauss AL. Field research: strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973:94-107.
24. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 1985:250-88.
25. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2002:199-276.
26. Glaser B, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967:101-16.
27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 1985:221-49.
28. Stake R. The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications, 1995:107-20.
29. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications, 1985:289-331.
30. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation. Third edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2002:460-506.
31. Denzin NK. Sociological methods. New York: McGraw Hill, 1978.
32. Russell CK, Gregory DM. Issues for consideration when choosing a qualitative data management system. J Adv Nurs 1993;18:1806-16.
33. Richards L, Richards T. Computing in qualitative analysis: a healthy development? Qual Health Res 1991;1:234-62.
34. Weitzman EA. Software and qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Second edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2000:803-20.
35. Sandelowski M. Writing a good read: strategies for re-presenting qualitative data. Res Nurs Health 1998;21:375-82.