Crossing the chasm: Information technology to biomedical informatics

Journal of Investigative Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 768-779

  Fahy, Brenda G ^a   William Balke, C ^b   Umberger, Gloria H ^a,c   Talbert, Jeffery ^d   Canales, Denise Niles ^e   Steltenkamp, Carol L ^a   Conigliaro, Joseph ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^d University of Kentucky   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedical informatics; CTSA; Information technology clinical and translational research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CENTER; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85047687210     PISSN: 17088267     EISSN: 17088267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e31821452bf     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Zerhouni EA. Medicine. The NIH roadmap. Science. 2003;302:63-72.
2. Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science-time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1621-1623. (Pubitemid 41434645)
3. Zerhouni EA, Alving B. Clinical and translational science awards: a framework for a national research agenda. Trans Res. 2006;148(1):4-5. (Pubitemid 44302104)
4. Anderson NR, Lee ES, Brockenbrough JS, et al. Issues in biomedical research data management and analysis: needs and barriers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:478-488. (Pubitemid 46963034)
5. Di Laura R, Turisco F, McGrew C, et al. Use of informatics and information technologies in the clinical research enterprise within US academic medical centers: progress and challenges from 2005 to 2007. J Investig Med. 2008;56:770-779.
6. Turisco F, Keogh D, Stubbs C, et al. Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US academic health centers: strategic value and opportunities for investment. J Investig Med. 2005;53:425-433. (Pubitemid 43038415)
7. University of Kentucky Top 20 Business Plan. Available at: http://www.uky.edu/OPBPA/business-plan.htm. Accessed May 25, 2010.
8. Havener L, ed. Standards for Cancer Registries, Volume V: Pathology Laboratory Electronic Reporting Version 2.2. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. 2009. Available at: http://www.naaccr.org/filesystem/ pdf/Standards-Volume-V-version-2.2-draftB-revised-February-2009.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2010.
9. Kim S, Gilbertson J. Information requirements of cancer center researchers focusing on human biological samples and associated data. Inf Process Manag. 2007;43:1383-1401. (Pubitemid 46646967)
10. Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR. Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:109-116. (Pubitemid 40694628)
11. Kim S, Rasmussen E. Characteristics of tissue-centric biomedical researchers using a survey and cluster analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59:1210-1223.
12. Wong S, Hoo K, Knowlton R, et al. Design and applications of a multimodality image data warehouse framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:239-254. (Pubitemid 34975818)
13. Conigliaro J, Justice AC, Gordon AJ, et al. How harmful is hazardous alcohol use and abuse in HIV infection: do providers know who is at risk? J Acquir Immune Defic Synd. 2003;33:521-525. (Pubitemid 36886082)
14. Bradley VM, Steltenkamp CL, Hite KB. Evaluation of reported medication errors before and after implementation of computerized practitioner order entry. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006;20:46-53.
15. Holsapple CW, Pakath R, Sasidharan S. AWeb site interface design framework for the cognitively impaired: a study in the context of Alzheimer's disease. J Elect Commerce Res. 2005;6:291-303.
16. Holsapple CW. The inseparability of modern knowledge management and computer-based technology. J Know Manag. 2005;9:42-52. (Pubitemid 40757275)
17. Chi L, Holsapple CW. Understanding computer-mediated interorganizational collaboration: a model and framework. J Know Manag. 2005;9:53-75. (Pubitemid 40757276)
18. Holsapple C, Joshi KD. A formal knowledge management ontology: conduct, activities, resources, and influences. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech. 2004;55:593-612.
19. Fang X, Holsapple CW. The usability of Web sites for knowledge acquisition: a taxonomy of influences. Int J Elec Bus. 2003;1:211-224.
20. Holsapple CW, Joshi KD. A collaborative approach to ontology design. Commun ACM. 2002;45:42-47. (Pubitemid 135699722)
21. Ireson CL, Slavova S, Steltenkamp CL, et al. Bridging the care continuum: patient information needs for specialist referrals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:163.
22. Menachemi N, Powers TL, Brooks RG. The role of information technology usage in physician practice satisfaction. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34:364-371.
23. Hersh W, Williamson J. Educating 10, 000 informaticians by 2010: the AMIA 10 × 10 program. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:377-382. (Pubitemid 46498982)