Expression of Concern: Men’s Sense of Humor and Women’s Responses to Courtship Solicitations: An Experimental Field Study (Psychological Reports, (2010), 107, 1, (145–156), 10.2466/07.17.PR0.107.4.145-156);Men's sense of humor and women's responses to courtship solicitations: An experimental field study

Psychological Reports

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 145-156

  Guéguen, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COURTSHIP; DECISION MAKING; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; HUMOR; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; WIT AND HUMOR AS TOPIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85047686336     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00332941231168281     Document Type: Erratum

References (17)

1. BRESSLER, E. R., & BALSHINE, S. (2006) The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 29-39.
2. BRESSLER, E. R., MARTIN, R. A., & BALSHINE, S. (2006) Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 121-130.
3. BUSS, D. M. (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
4. CUNNINGHAM, M. R. (1989) Reactions to heterosexual opening gambits: female selectivity and male responsiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 27-41.
5. GOODWIN, R. (1990) Sex differences among partner preferences: are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles, 23, 501-513.
6. HANSEN, S. L. (1977) Dating choices of high school students. Family Coordinator, 26, 133-138.
7. KENRICK, D. T., GROTH, G. E., TROST, M. R., & SADALLA, E. K. (1993) Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, selfappraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
8. KENRICK, D. T., SADALLA, E. K., GROTH, G. E., & TROST, M. R. (1990) Evolution, traits, and the stage of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97-117.
9. LUNDY, D. E., TAN, J., & CUNNINGHAM, M. R. (1998) Heterosexual romantic preferences: the importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 311-325. (Pubitemid 128655492)
10. MACKINNON, D. P. (2008) Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.
11. MILLER, G. F. (2000) The mating mind. New York: Random House.
12. REGAN, P. C., & JOSHI, A. (2003) Ideal partner preferences among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 13-20.
13. ROBINSON, D. T., & SMITH-LOVIN, L. (2001) Getting a laugh: gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces, 80, 123-158.
14. SHACKELFORD, T. K., SCHMITT, D. P., & BUSS, D. M. (2005) Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447-458.
15. SIMPSON, J. A., GANGESTAD, S. W., CHRISTENSEN, N. P., & LECK, K. (1999) Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitives tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 159-172.
16. SMITH, J. E., WALDORF, A., & TREMBATH, D. L. (1990) "Single white male looking for thin, very attractive..." Sex Roles, 23, 675-685.
17. TODOSFJEVIC, B., SNEZANA, L., & ARANCIC, A. (2006) Mate selection criteria: a trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 116-126.