Syllabic organization and deafness: Orthographic structure or letter frequency in reading?

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 421-438

  Olson, Andrew C ^a   Nickerson, Jane F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PERIODICITY; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

DEAFNESS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; PERIODICITY; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 85047685580     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755975     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2. Adams, M. (1981). What good is orthographic redundancy? In O. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Hillsdalc, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. Badecker, W. (1996). Representational properties common to phonological and orthographic output systems. Lingua, 99, 55-83.
5. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.
6. Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 156-178.
7. Burden, V., & Campbell, R. (1994). The development of word-coding skills in the born deaf - an experimental study of deaf school leavers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 331-349.
8. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1989). Orthographic structure, the graphemic buffer and the spelling process. In C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Brain and reading. Macmillan/Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series.
9. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297.
10. Clements, G. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clements, G., & Keyser, S. (1983). CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Gibson, E., Shurcliff, A., & Yonas, A. (1970). Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In H. Levin & J. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
13. Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
14. Hanson, V. (1986). Access to spoken language and the acquisition of orthographic structure: Evidence from deaf readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 193-212.
15. Hanson, V., & Fowler, C. (1987). Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers. Memory & Cognition, 15, 199-207.
16. Hanson, V., Shankweiler, D., & Fischer, F. (1983). Determinants of spelling ability in deaf and hearing adults: Access to linguistic structure. Cognition, 14, 323-344.
17. Harris, K., & McGarr, N. (1980). Relationships between speech perception and speech production in normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. In J. Subtelny (Ed.), Speech assessment and speech improvement for the hearing impaired. Washington, DC: A.G. Bell Association for the Deaf.
18. Haugen, E. (1956a). The syllable in linguistic description. In M. Halle (Ed.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton.
19. Haugen, E. (1956b). Syllabification in Kutenai. International Journal of American Linguistics, 22, 196-201.
20. Holt, J.A. (1993). Stanford Achievement Test - 8th edition: Reading comprehension subgroup results. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 172-175.
21. Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington: Indiana Unitersity Linguistics Club.
22. Katz, L., & Baldasare, J. (1983). Syllable coding in printed-word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 245-256.
23. Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Kuçera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
25. Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Levitt, H., & Stromberg, H. (1983). Segmental characteristics of the speech of hearing-impaired children: Factors affecting intelligibility. In I. Hochberg, H. Levitt, & M. Osberger (Eds.), Speech of the hearing impaired. Baltimore: University Park Press.
27. McGarr, N., & Harris, K. (1983). Articulatory control in a deaf speaker. In I. Hochberg, H. Levitt, & M. Osberger (Eds.), Speech of the hearing impaired. Baltimore: University Park Press.
28. Meadow, K. (1980). Deafness and child development. London: Edward Arnold.
29. Metz, D., Whitehead, R., & Mahshie, J. (1982). Physiological correlates of the speech of the deaf: A preliminary view. In D. Sims, G. Walter, & R. Whitehead (Eds.), Deafness and communication. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
30. Mewhort, D., & Beal, A. (1977). Mechanisms of word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 629-640.
31. Millis, M. (1986). Syllables and spelling units affect feature integration in words. Memory & Cognition, 14, 409-419.
32. Olson, A., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Orthographic structure and deaf spelling errors: Syllables, letter frequency and speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33. Padden, C. (1993). Lessons to be learned from the young deaf orthographer. Linguistics and Education, 5, 71-86.
34. Pike, K.L. (1947). Phonemics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35. Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 330-340.
36. Prinzmetal, W., & Millis-Wright, M. (1984). Cognitive and linguistic factors affect visual feature integration. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 305-340.
37. Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 461-475.
38. Quigley, S., & Paul, P. (1984). Language and deafness. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
39. Rapp, B. (1992). The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 33-53.
40. Reilly, A. (1979). Syllable nucleus duration in the speech of hearing and deaf children. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
41. Seidenberg, M. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention & performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
42. Solso, R., & Juel, C. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two-through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 297-343.
43. Spoehr, K., & Smith, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 71-89.
44. Stetson, R.H. (1928). Motor phonetics. Archives Néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale, 3, 1-216.
45. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention & performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
46. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
47. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 66-85.
48. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
49. Winer, B. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.