Low-frequency acoustic modulations generated by the high-frequency portion of the cochlea, noninvasively recorded from the scalp of mice (Mus musculus)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 22-35

  Henry, Kenneth R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; C57BL MOUSE; CBA MOUSE; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; MALE; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND DETECTION; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED CBA; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 85047678659     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.22     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Batra, R., Kuwada, S., & Maher, V. (1986). The frequency following response to continuous tones in humans. Hearing Research, 21, 167-177.
2. Bieser, A. (1998). Processing of twitter-call fundamental frequencies in insula and auditory cortex of squirrel monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 122, 139-148.
3. Bieser, A., & Muller-Pruess, P. (1996). Auditory responsive cortex in the squirrel monkey: Neural responses to amplitude-modulated sounds. Experimental Brain Research, 108, 273-284.
4. Chimento, T. C., & Schreiner, C. E. (1991). Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 263-273.
5. Condon, C. J., White, K. R., & Feng, A. S. (1994). Processing of amplitude-modulated signals that mimic echoes from fluttering targets in the inferior colliculus of the little brown bat, Myotis lucifugus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 768-784.
6. Cynx, J., & Shapiro, M. (1986). Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 100, 356-360.
7. Dolan, D. F., Nuttall, A. L., & Avinash, G. (1990). Asynchronous activity recorded from the round window. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2621-2627.
8. Dolphin, W. F., & Mountain, D. C. (1993). The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitudemodulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 3215-3226.
9. Fletcher, H. (1924). The physical criterion for determining the pitch of a musical tone. Physiological Review, 23, 427-437.
10. Galbraith, G. C. (1994). Two-channel brainstem frequency-following responses to pure tones and missing fundamental stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 321-330.
11. Goldstein, J. L. (1978). Mechanism of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch. Audiology, 17, 421-445.
12. Gulick, W. L., Gescheider, G. A., & Frisina, R. D. (1989). Hearing: Physiological acoustics, neural coding, and psychophysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Henry, K. R. (1979). Auditory brainstem volume-conducted responses: Origins in the laboratory mouse. Journal of the American Audiological Society, 4, 173-178.
14. Henry, K. R. (1982). Age-related auditory loss and genetics: An electrocochleographic comparison of six inbred strains of mice. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 275-282.