|
|
Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 305-313
|
|
Misconceived sources of opposition to physician-assisted suicide
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT (OREGON);
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINAL CARE;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT (OREGON);
LEGAL APPROACH;
COERCION;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
OREGON;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINAL CARE;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
|
|
EID: 85047675827
PISSN: 10768971
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.6.2.305 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
