Collisions, logrolls, and psychological science

American Psychologist

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 219-221

  Phillips, Deborah ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

HUMANS; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLISHING;

EID: 85047674301     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.3.219     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Atkinson, R. C. (1977). Reflections on psychology's past and concerns about its future. American Psychologist, 32, 205-210.
3. Bevan, W. (1980). On getting in bed with a lion. American Psychologist, 35, 779-789.
4. Featherman, D. L., & Vinovskis, M. A. (2001). Growth and use of social and behavioral science in the federal government since World War II. In D. L. Featherman & M. A. Vinovskis (Eds.), Social science and policy-making: A search for relevance in the twentieth century (pp. 40-82). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5. Gardner, W., & Wilcox, B. L. (1993). Political intervention in scientific peer review: Research on adolescent sexual behavior. American Psychologist, 48, 972-983.
6. Garrison, E. G., & Kobor, P. C. (2002). Weathering a political storm: A contextual perspective on a psychological research controversy. American Psvchologist, 57, 165-175.
7. Gilliam, F. D., & Bales, S. N. (2001). Strategic frame analysis: Reframing America's youth. Social Policy Report: Giving Child and Youth Development Knowledge Away, 15(3), 2-15.
8. Greenberger, E. (1983). A researcher in the policy arena: The case of child labor. American Psychologist, 38, 104-111.
9. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57, 176-188.
10. March, J. (1976). Science, politics, and Mr. Gruenberg. In National Academy of Sciences Annual Report: 1976 (pp. 27-36). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Prewitt, K. (1983). Subverting policy premises. In D. Callahan & B. Jennings (Eds.), Ethics, the social sciences and policy analyses (pp. 293-304). New York: Plenum.
12. Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
13. Robinson, D. N. (1984). Ethics and advocacy. American Psychologist, 39, 787-793.
14. Shonkoff, J. P. (2000). Science, policy, and practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Development, 71(1), 181-187.
15. Thompson, R. A., & Nelson, C. A. (2001). Developmental science and the media: Early brain development. American Psychologist, 56, 1-11.
16. Weiss, C. A. (1984). Increasing the likelihood of influencing decisions. In L. Turman (Ed.), Evaluation research methods: A basic guide (pp. 159-190). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Weiss, C. A., & Singer, E. (1988). Reporting of social science in the national media. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. White, S., & Phillips, D. (2001). Designing Head Start: Roles played by developmental psychologists. In D. L. Featherman & M. A. Vinovskis (Eds.), Social science and policy-making: A search for relevance in the twentieth century (pp. 83-118). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Wilcox, B. L. (1987). Pornography, social science, and politics: When research and ideology collide. American Psychologist, 42, 941-943.