Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: An in vitro study

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1991, Pages 293-305

  Winchester, L J ^a  

^a Dental Institute   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; HELIOSIT; PRISMA FIL; PRISMA-FIL; RESIN; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVES; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL DEBONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 85047672188     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/13.4.293     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bamford T D 1989 An investigation into the debonding of chemically retained ceramic orthodontic brackets. MSc thesis, University of London
2. Beech D R, Jalaly T 1981 Clinical and laboratory evaluation of some orthodontic direct bonding systems. Journal of Dental Research 60: 972-978
3. Buonocore M G 1963 Principles of adhesion and adhesive restorative materials. Journal of the American Dental Association 67: 382-391
4. Buzzitta VAJ, Hallgren S E, Powers JM 1982 Bond strength of orthodontic direct bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 87-92
5. Chaconas SJ, Caputo A A, Niu SL 1989 Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding agents. Journal of Dental Research 68: 945 (abst 630)
6. Dogon I L 1975 Studies demonstrating the need for an intermediary resin of low viscosity for the acid etch technique; In: Silverstone L M, Dogon I L (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium of Acid Etch Technique. North Central Publications, St Paul, 100
7. Eden GT, Craig RG, Peyton FA 1970 Evaluation of a tensile test for direct filling resins. Journal of Dental Research 49: 428-438
8. Evans L B, Powers J M 1985 Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of no mix orthodontic cements. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 508-512
9. Ferguson J W, Read M J F, Watts D C 1984 Bond strengths of an integral bracket-base. European Journal of Orthodontics 6: 267-276
10. Fujita K. 1979 New orthodontic treatment with lingual bracket mushroom archwire appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 76: 657-675
11. Garner L D, Kotwal N S 1973 Correlation study of incisive biting forces with age, sex and anterior occlusion. Journal of Dental Research 52: 698-702
12. Gottlieb E L, Vogels D S 1984 1983 Orthodontic practice study. Part 2: practice success. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 18: 247-253
13. Gwinnett AJ 1988 A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 93: 346-348
14. Iwamoto H, Kawamoto T, Kinoshita Z 1987 Bond strength of new ceramic brackets as studied in vitro. Journal of Dental Research 66: 928 (abst 83)
15. Joseph VP, Rossouw E 1990 The shear bond strength of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 121-125
16. Mackay F A 1987 The effect of adhesive type and thickness on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. MSc Thesis, University of London
17. Miller RG 1981 Simultaneous statistical inference. Springer-Verlag, New York
18. Moin K, Dogon I L 1978 An evaluation of shear strength, measurements of unfilled and filled resin combinations. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 531-535
19. Newman G V 1969 Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachments. American Journal of Orthodontics 56: 573-588
20. Newman G V 1978 Adult orthodontics. Dental Survey 54: 24-34
21. Odegaard J, Segner D 1988 Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 94: 201-206
22. Reynolds I R 1975 A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British Dental Journal 2: 171-178
23. Schulz R P, Mayhew R B, Oesterle L J, Pierson W P 1985 Bond strengths of three resin systems used with brackets and embedded wire attachments. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 75-80
24. Scott GE 1988 Fracture toughness and surface cracks— the key to understanding ceramic brackets. Angle Orthodontist 58: 5-8
25. Storm E R 1990 Debonding ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 24: 91-94
26. Swartz M L 1988a Ceramic brackets. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 22: 82-88
27. Swartz M L 1988 A technical bulletin on the issues of bonding and debonding ceramic brackets
28. Tavas M A, Watts DC 1979 Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. British Journal of Orthodontics 6: 207-208
29. Thanos C E, Munholland T, Caputo A A 1979 Adhesion of mesh-base direct bonding brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics 75: 421-430