Aerial and ground based sensing of tolerance to beet cyst nematode in sugar beet

Remote Sensing

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2018, Pages

  Joalland, Samuel ^a,b   Screpanti, Claudio ^a   Varella, Hubert Vincent ^a   Reuther, Marie ^c   Schwind, Mareike ^c   Lang, Christian ^c   Walter, Achim ^b   Liebisch, Frank ^b  

^a SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c Verband der Hessisch Pfälzischen Zuckerrübenanbauer e V   (Germany)

Author keywords

Canopy height; Field; Heterodera schachtii; Hyperspectral images; Root; Spectrometry; Thermography; UAV

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; DECISION TREES; HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING; MOBILE ANTENNAS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; NITROGEN; SPECTROMETRY; SPECTROSCOPY; SUGAR BEETS; THERMOGRAPHY (IMAGING); THERMOGRAPHY (TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT); UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

CANOPY HEIGHTS; FIELD; HETERODERA SCHACHTII; MULTI VARIATE ANALYSIS; PARAMETER COMBINATION; ROOT; SPECTRAL INFORMATION; TEMPERATURE INFORMATION;

CULTIVATION;

EID: 85047556650     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs10050787     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Global Agriculture towards 2050; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Itlay, 2009
2. Müller, J. The economic importance of Heterodera schachtii in Europe. Helminthologia 1999, 36, 205-213
3. Biancardi, E.; McGrath, J.M.; Panella, L.W.; Lewellen, R.T.; Stevanato, P. Sugar beet. In Root and Tuber Crops; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 173-219
4. Steele, A.E.; Arnold, E. The host range of the sugar beet nematode; Heterodera schachtii Schmidt. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 1965, 13, 573-603
5. Harveson, R.M.; Jackson, T.M. Sugar Beet Cyst Nematode; University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension: Lincoln, NE, USA, 2008
6. Cooke, D.A. Beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schmidt) and its control on sugar beet. Agric. Zool. Rev. 1987, 2, 135-183
7. Schmitz, A.; Tartachnyk, I.I.; Kiewnick, S.; Sikora, R.A.; Kühbauch, W. Detection of Heterodera schachtii infestation in sugar beet by means of laser-induced and pulse amplitude modulated chlorophyll fluorescence. Nematology 2006, 8, 273-286
8. Heath, W.L.; Haydock, P.P.J.;Wilcox, A.; Evans, K. The potential use of spectral reflectance from the potato crop for remote sensing of infection by potato cyst nematodes. Asp. Appl. Biol. 2000, 60, 185-188
9. Nutter, F.W.; Tylka, G.L.; Guan, J.; Moreira, A.J.D.; Marett, C.C.; Rosburg, T.R. Use of remote sensing to detect soybean cyst nematode-induced plant stress. J. Nematol. 2002, 34, 222-231
10. Laudien, R. Entwicklung Eines GIS-Gestützten Schlagbezogenen Führungsinformationssystems für die Zuckerwirtschaft. (Development of a Field-and GIS-Based Management Information System for the Sugar Beet Industry). Ph. D. Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, 2005
11. Hillnhütter, C.; Mahlein, A.K.; Sikora, R.A.; Oerke, E.C. Use of imaging spectroscopy to discriminate symptoms caused by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani on sugar beet. Precis. Agric. 2012, 13, 17-32
12. Joalland, S.; Screpanti, C.; Gaume, A.;Walter, A. Belowground biomass accumulation assessed by digital image based leaf area detection. Plant Soil. 2016, 398, 257-266
13. Joalland, S.; Screpanti, C.; Liebisch, F.; Varella, H.V.; Gaume, A.;Walter, A. Comparison of visible imaging; thermography and spectrometry methods to evaluate the effect of Heterodera schachtii inoculation on sugar beets. Plant Methods 2017, 13, 73
14. Sher-Kaul, S.; Oertli, B.; Castella, E.; Lachavanne, J.B. Relationship between biomass and surface area of six submerged aquatic plant species. Aquat. Bot. 1995, 51, 147-154
15. Smith, S.M.; Garrett, P.B.; Leeds, J.A.; McCormick, P.V. Evaluation of digital photography for estimating live and dead aboveground biomass in monospecific macrophyte stands. Aquat. Bot. 2000, 67, 69-77
16. Mizoue, N.; Masutani, T. Image analysis measure of crown condition; foliage biomass and stem growth relationships of Chamaecyparis obtusa. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 172, 79-88
17. Tackenberg, O. A new method for non-destructive measurement of biomass; growth rates; vertical biomass distribution and dry matter content based on digital image analysis. Ann. Bot. Lond. 2007, 99, 777-783
18. Baret, F.; Guyot, G. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 35, 161-173
19. Hillnhütter, C.; Mahlein, A.K.; Sikora, R.A.; Oerke, E.C. Remote sensing to detect plant stress induced by Heterodera schachtii and Rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet fields. Field Crop Res. 2011, 122, 70-77
20. Schmitz, A.; Kiewnick, S.; Schlang, J.; Sikora, R.A. Use of high resolution digital thermography to detect Heterodera schachtii infestation in sugar beets. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2004, 69, 359-363
21. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79-97
22. Araus, J.L.; Cairns, J. Field high-throughput phenotyping-The new crop breeding frontier. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 52-61
23. Walter, A.; Liebisch, F.; Hund, A. Plant phenotyping: From bean weighing to image analysis. Plant Methods 2015, 11, 14
24. Bendig, J.; Bolten, A.; Bareth, G. Introducing a low-cost mini-UAV for thermal-and multispectral-imaging. In Proceedings of the XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August-1 September 2012; pp. 345-349
25. Guo, T.; Kujirai, T.; Watanabe, T. Mapping crop status from an unmanned aerial vehicle for precision agriculture applications. In Proceedings of the XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August-1 September 2012; pp. 485-490
26. Primicerio, J.; Di Gennaro, S.F.; Fiorillo, E.; Genesio, L.; Lugato, E.;Matese, A.; Vaccari, F.P.A. Flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for precision agriculture. Precis. Agric. 2012, 13, 517-523
27. Tattaris, M.; Reynolds, M.P.; Chapman, S.C. A Direct Comparison of Remote Sensing Approaches for High-Throughput Phenotyping in Plant Breeding. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1131
28. Akhtman, Y.; Golubeva, E.; Tutubalina, O.; Zimin, M. Application of hyperspectral images and ground data for precision farming. Geogr. Environ. Sustain. 2017, 10, 117-128
29. Constantin, D.; Rehak, M.; Akhtman, Y.; Liebisch, F. Detection of crop properties by means of hyperspectral remote sensing from a micro UAV. In Bornimer Agrartechnische Berichte; Leibniz-Institut für Agrartechnik Potsdam-Bornim eV: Potsdam, Germany, 2015; pp. 129-137
30. Khanna, R.; Möller, M.; Pfeifer, J.; Liebisch, F.; Walter, A.; Siegwart, R. Beyond point clouds-3d mapping and field parameter measurements using UAVs. In Proceedings of the IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Luxembourg, 8-11 September 2015; pp. 1-4
31. Liebisch, F.; Kirchgessner, N.; Schneider, D.; Walter, A.; Hund, A. Remote, aerial phenotyping of maize traits with a mobile multi-sensor approach. Plant Methods 2015, 11, 9
32. Burkart, A.; Hecht, V.L.; Kraska, T.; Rascher, U. Phenological analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle based time series of barley imagery with high temporal resolution. Precis. Agric. 2018, 19, 134-146
33. Jimenez-Bello, M.A.; Royuela, A.; Manzano, J.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Intrigliolo, D. Assessment of drip irrigation sub-units using airborne thermal imagery acquired with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). In Precision Agriculture 13; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 705-711
34. Diaz-Varela, R.A.; de la Rosa, R.; Leon, L.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J. High-resolution airborne UAV imagery to assess olive tree crown parameters using 3D photo reconstruction: Application in breeding trials. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 4213-4232
35. Roth, L.; Streit, B. Predicting cover crop biomass by lightweight UAS-based RGB and NIR photography: An applied photogrammetric approach. Precis. Agric. 2017, 1-22
36. Sankaran, S.; Khot, L.R.; Espinoza, C.Z.; Jarolmasjed, S.; Sathuvalli, V.R.; Vandemark, G.J.; Miklas, P.N.; Carter, A.H.; Pumphrey, M.O.; Knowles, N.R.; et al. Low-altitude; high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: A review. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 70, 112-123
37. Yang, G.; Liu, J.; Zhao, C.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H.; Xu, B.; Yang, X.; Zhu, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, R.; et al. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing for Field-Based Crop Phenotyping: Current Status and Perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1111
38. Yu, K.; Lenz-Wiedemann, V.; Chen, X.; Bareth, G. Estimating leaf chlorophyll of barley at different growth stages using spectral indices to reduce soil background and canopy structure effects. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2014, 97, 58-77
39. Sa, I.; Chen, Z.; Popovic, M.; Khanna, R.; Liebisch, F.; Nieto, J.; Siegwart, R. weedNet: Dense Semantic Weed Classification Using Multispectral Images and MAV for Smart Farming. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2018, 3, 588-595
40. Reuther, M.; Lang, C.; Grundler, F.M.W. Nematode-tolerant sugar beet varieties-Resistant or susceptible to the Beet Cyst Nematode Heterodera schachtii? Sugar Ind. 2017, 142, 277-284
41. Grosse, E.; Banasiak, L.; Lyr, H.; Jock, M. Neuer Labortest zum Nachweis des Rübennematoden (Heterodera schachtii). Nachr.-Bl. Pflanzenschutz DDR 1985, 39, 111-112
42. Grosse, E.; Decker, H. Untersuchungen zur Eignung von Biotest und Schlupftest für den quantitativenNachweis des Rübenzystenälchen (Heterodera schachtii) in Bodenproben. Nachr.-Bl. Pflanzenschutz DDR 1989, 43, 227-230
43. Oerke, E.C.; Steiner, U. Potential of digital thermography for disease control. In Precision Crop Protection-The Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity; Oerke, E.C., Gerhards, R., Menz, G., Sikora, R.A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 167-182
44. Rouse, J.W.; Haas, R.H.; Schell, J.A.; Deering, D.W. Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with ERTS; NASA: Goddard, MD, USA, 1974; Volume 351, p. 309
45. Mistele, B.; Gutser, R.; Schmidhalter, U.; Mulla, D.J. Validation of field-scaled spectral measurements of the nitrogen status in winter wheat. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Precision Agriculture and Other Precision Resources Management, Hyatt Regency, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25-28 July 2004; Precision Agriculture Center, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2004; pp. 25-28, 1187-1195
46. Haboudane, D.;Miller, J.R.; Tremblay, N.; Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; Dextraze, L. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 81, 416-426
47. Hunt, E.R.; Daughtry, C.S.T.; Eitel, J.U.; Long, D.S. Remote sensing leaf chlorophyll content using a visible band index. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 1090-1099
48. Gitelson, A.A.; Keydan, G.P.; Merzlyak, M.N. Three-band model for noninvasive estimation of chlorophyll; carotenoids; and anthocyanin contents in higher plant leaves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33
49. Gamon, J.A.; Penuelas, J.; Field, C.B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens. Environ. 1992, 41, 35-44
50. Gao, B.C. NDWI-A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 1996, 58, 257-266
51. Clay, D.E.; Kim, K.I.; Chang, J.; Clay, S.A.; Dalsted, K. Characterizing water and nitrogen stress in corn using remote sensing. Agron. J. 2006, 98, 579-587
52. Penuelas, J.; Pinol, J.; Ogaya, R.; Filella, I. Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance water index WI (R900/R970). Int. J. Remote Sens. 1997, 18, 2869-2875
53. Mahlein, A.K.; Rumpf, T.;Welke, P.; Dehne, H.W.; Plümer, L.; Steiner, U.; Oerke, E.C. Development of spectral indices for detecting and identifying plant diseases. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 128, 21-30
54. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2008. Available online: http://www. R-project.org (accessed on 1 July 2017)
55. Witten, I.H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M.A.; Pal, C.J. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques; Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2016
56. Weiss, S.M.; Kulikowski, C.A. Computer Systems that Learn; Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1991
57. Breiman, L.; Friedman, J.; Olshen, R.; Stone, C. Classification and Regression Trees;Wadsworth International Group: Belmont, CA, USA, 1984
58. Oostenbrink, M. Major characteristics of the relations between nematodes and plants. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium of nematology, Antibes, France, 8-14 September 1966
59. Sherrod, P.H. DTREG Predictive Modeling Software. Users Manual. Available online: www.dtreg.com/DTREG.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2018)
60. Landis, J.R.; Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33, 159-174
61. Seinhorst, J.W. The relation between nematode density and damage to plants. Nematologica 1965, 11, 137-154
62. Cooke, D.A.; Thomason, I.J. The relationship between population density of Heterodera schachtii; soil temperature; and sugarbeet yields. J. Nematol. 1979, 11, 124
63. Hauer, M.; Koch, H.J.; Märländer, B. Water use efficiency of sugar beet cultivars (Beta vulgaris L.) susceptible; tolerant or resistant to Heterodera schachtii (Schmidt) in environments with contrasting infestation levels. Field Crops Res. 2015, 183, 356-364
64. Trudgill, D.L. Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1991, 29, 167-192
65. Inoue, Y.; Kimball, B.A.; Jackson, R.D.; Pinter, P.J.; Reginato, R.J. Remote estimation of leaf transpiration rate and stomatal resistance based on infrared thermometry. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1990, 51, 21-33
66. Jones, H.G.; Schofield, P. Thermal and other remote sensing of plant stress. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 2008, 34, 19-32
67. Trudgill, D.L. Effects of Globodera rostochiensis and fertilisers on the mineral nutrient content and yield of potato plants. Nematologica 1980, 26, 243-254
68. Haverkort, A.J.; Fasan, T.; Van de Waart, M. The influence of cyst nematodes and drought on potato growth 2 Effects on plant water relations under semi-controlled conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1991, 97, 162-170
69. Jones, H.G. Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology. Adv. Bot. Res. 2004, 41, 107-163
70. Evans, K.; Franco, J. Tolerance to cyst-nematode attack in commercial potato cultivars and some possible mechanisms for its operation. Nematologica 1979, 25, 153-162
71. Trudgill, D.L. Concepts of resistance; tolerance and susceptibility in relation to cyst nematodes. In Cyst Nematodes; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 179-189
72. Radcliffe, D.E.; Hussey, R.S.; McClendon, R.W. Cyst nematode vs. tolerant and intolerant soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 1990, 82, 855-860
73. Aasen, H.; Bolten, A. Multi-temporal high-resolution imaging spectroscopy with hyperspectral 2D imagers-From theory to application. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 205, 374-389
74. Shakoor, N.; Lee, S.; Mockler, T.C. High throughput phenotyping to accelerate crop breeding and monitoring of diseases in the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 38, 184-192