Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation

Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-267

  Ricoeur, Paul ^a   Thompson, John B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047379369     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316534984     Document Type: Book

References (170)

1. W. Dilthey, ‘The development of hermeneutics’, in Selected Writings, edited and translated by H.P. Rickman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), pp. 246-63.
2. Richard E. Palmer, Hermeneutics:Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer (Evanston:Northwestern University Press, 1969).
3. Don Ihde, Hermeneutic Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1971).
4. Michel Philibert, Ricoeur ou la liberté selon l’espérance (Paris:Seghers, 1971).
5. my Critical Hermeneutics: A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
6. Paul Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, translated by Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967), p. 215.
7. Paul Ricoeur, Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary, translated by Erazim V. Kohák (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966), p. 486.
8. Paul Ricoeur, Fallible Man, translated by Charles Kelbley (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1965), p. xvi.
9. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The hermeneutics of symbols and philosophical reflection: i’, translated by Denis Savage, in The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, edited by Don Ihde (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974), p. 299.
10. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, translated by Denis Savage (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970), pp. 26-7.
11. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The question of the subject: the challenge of semiology’, translated by Kathleen McLaughlin, in The Conflict of Interpretations, p. 263.
12. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy, p. 375.
13. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy, p. 419.
14. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The question of the subject’, p. 250.
15. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Structure and hermeneutics’, translated by Kathleen McLaughlin, in The Conflict of Interpretations, p. 40.
16. Robert Sweeney, in The Conflict of Interpretations, p. 84.
17. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Structure and hermeneutics’, p. 51.
18. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Structure, word, event’, p. 86.
19. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’, in this volume, p. 134.
20. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Creativity in language’, translated by David Pellauer, in The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work, edited by Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart (Boston: Beacon Press, 1978), p. 125.
21. Paul Ricoeur, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, translated by Robert Czerny (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), pp. 156-7.
22. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’, p. 136.
23. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The hermeneutical function of distanciation’, p. 139.
24. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text’, in this volume, p. 211.
25. Paul Ricoeur, ‘What is a text? Explanation and understanding’, in this volume, p. 161.
26. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The model of the text’, p. 209.
27. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Explanation and understanding: on some remarkable connections among the theory of the text, theory of action, and theory of history’, translated by Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart, in The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, p. 161
28. Paul Ricoeur, ‘History and hermeneutics’, translated by David Pellauer, Journal of Philosophy, 73 (1976), p. 692.
29. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The narrative function’, in this volume, p. 295.
30. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy, p. 46.
31. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The question of the subject’, p. 243.
32. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Appropriation’, in this volume, p. 185.
33. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Existence and hermeneutics’, translated by Kathleen McLaughlin, in The Conflict of Interpretations, p. 11.
34. W. Dilthey, ‘Origine et développement de l’herméneutique’ (1900) in Le Monde de l’Esprit i (Paris: Aubier, 1947), especially pp. 319-22, 333
35. English translation: ‘The development of hermeneutics’ in Selected Writings, edited and translated by H.P. Rickman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976).
36. F. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik und Kritik, volume vii of Sämmtliche Werke, edited by F. Lucke (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1938), secs. 15-16.
37. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1960; hereafter cited in the text as WM), p. 173 [English translation: Truth and Method (London: Sheed and Ward, 1975; hereafter cited in the text as TM), p. 163].
38. F. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutik, edited by H. Kimmerle (Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1959), p. 56.
39. This edition appeared in the Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse, 2 (1959).
40. Abhandlungen gelesen in der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, in Schleiermachers Werke i, edited by O. Braum and J. Bauer (Leipzig: F. Erkardt, 1911), pp. 374 ff.
41. W. Dilthey, ‘The development of hermeneutics’, p. 260.
42. F. Mussner, Histoire de l’herméneutique de Schleiermacher à nos jours, translated from German by T. Nieberding and M. Massart (Paris: Cerf, 1972), pp. 27-30.
43. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1927; hereafter cited in the text as SZ), pp. 2, 5 ff.
44. David E. Linge, in Philosophical Hermeneutics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976)]
45. Jeremy J. Shapiro, in Toward a Rational Society (London: Heinemann, 1971).
46. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, p. 57.
47. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1927).
48. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Kleine Schriften i, p. 158.
49. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Kleine Schriften, p. 101
50. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Kleine Schriften, p. 104 [p. 7].
51. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Kleine Schriften, p. 107 [p. 11].
52. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, p. 9.
53. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, p. 309.
54. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, p. 149.
55. The ‘Nachwort’ first appeared in the Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung (1930).
56. H.L. van Breda (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952; hereafter cited in the text as Hua v), pp. 138-62.
57. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1927).
58. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978).
59. Martin Heidegger, ‘Hegels Begriff der Erfahrung’ in Holzwege (Frankfurt: Vittoria Klostermann, 1950)
60. English translation: Hegel’s Concept of Experience (New York: Harper and Row, 1970).
61. Jean-Paul Sartre, ‘Une idée fondamentale de la phénoménologie de Husserl: l’intentionnalité’ in Situations 1 (Paris: Gallimard, 1947)
62. Joseph P. Fell, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 1, no. 2 (1970), pp. 4-5.
63. Edmund Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen ii (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1900; hereafter cited in the text as LU ii), pp. 61 ff.
64. J.N. Findlay (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970; hereafter cited in the text as LI i), pp. 299 ff.].
65. S. Strasser (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950; hereafter cited in the text as Hua i), p. 30.
66. English translation: Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, translated by Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960; hereafter cited in the text as CM), p. 99.
67. Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale (Paris: Edition critique T. de Mauro, 1973), pp. 30 ff., 36 ff., 112, 227
68. Louis Hjelmslev, Essais linguistiques (Copenhague: Cercle linguistique de Copenhague, 1959).
69. Emile Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale (Paris: Gallimard, 1966)
70. J.L. Austin, How to do Things with Words (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
71. John R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).
72. G.-G. Granger, Essai d’une philosophie du style (Paris: A. Colin, 1968), p. 6.
73. G.-G. Granger, Essai d’une philosophie du style, p. 11.
74. G.-G. Granger, Essai d’une philosophie du style, p. 12.
75. W.K. Wimsatt, The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press, 1954).
76. G. Frege, ‘On sense and reference’ in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960).
77. W. Dilthey, ‘Origine et développement de l’herméneutique’ (1900) in Le Monde de l’Esprit i (Paris: Aubier, 1947), p. 320
78. English translation: ‘The development of hermeneutics’ in Selected Writings, edited and translated by H.P. Rickman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), p. 248
79. English translation: ‘The development of hermeneutics’, p. 333 [pp. 259-60].
80. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale (Paris: Plon, 1958) p. 233
81. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), pp. 210-11.
82. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), p. 234 [p. 211].
83. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), p. 239 [p. 216].
84. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), p. 241 [p. 217].
85. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), p. 248 [p. 224].
86. English translation:Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1968), p. 243 [p. 220].
87. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Sur l’exégèse de Genèse 1, 1-2, 4a’ in Roland Barthes et al., Exégèse et herméneutique (Paris: Seuil, 1971), pp. 67-84.
88. G.-G. Granger, Essai d’une philosophie du style (Paris: A. Colin, 1968), p. 115.
89. I.A. Richards, The Philosophy of Rhetoric (New York: Oxford University Press, 1936).
90. Max Black, Models and Metaphors (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962).
91. Monroe Beardsley, Aesthetics (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1958).
92. ‘The metaphorical twist’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 20 (1962), pp. 293-307.
93. Douglas Berggren, ‘The use and abuse of metaphor, i and ii’, Review of Metaphysics, 16 (1962), pp. 237-58, and 16 (1963), pp. 450-72.
94. Douglas Berggren, ‘The use and abuse of metaphor, i and ii’, Review of Metaphysics, 16 (1962), p. 43.
95. Douglas Berggren, ‘The use and abuse of metaphor, i and ii’, Review of Metaphysics, 16 (1962), p. 302.
96. Eric D. Hirsch, Jr, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967).
97. W. Dilthey, ‘Origine et développement de l’herméneutique’ (1900) in Le Monde de l’Esprit i (Paris: Aubier, 1947)
98. English translation: ‘The development of hermeneutics’ in Selected Writings, edited and translated by H.P. Rickman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976)
99. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1960)
100. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1960), p. 109 [p. 102].
101. Wayne C. Booth, ‘Distance et point de vue’; all in Poétique, iv (1970).
102. F. van Rossum-Guyon, ‘Point de vue ou perspective narrative’, pp. 481-2 and 485-90.
103. W.C. Booth, quoted in F. van Rossum-Guyon, Point de vue ou perspective narrative, p. 482.
104. W. Dilthey, quoted in F. van Rossum-Guyon, Point de vue ou perspective narrative, p. 486.
105. F.K. Stanzel, quoted in F. van Rossum-Guyon, Point de vue ou perspective narrative, p. 490.
106. Wolfgang Kayser, ‘Qui raconte le roman?', p. 510.
107. Wolfgang Kayser, ‘Qui raconte le roman?', p. 502.
108. Wolfgang Kayser, ‘Qui raconte le roman?', p. 510.
109. Paul Ricoeur, ‘The question of the subject: the challenge of semiology’, translated by Kathleen McLaughlin, in The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, edited by Don Ihde (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974), pp. 236-66.
110. Anthony Kenny, Action, Emotion and Will (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 196)
111. J.L. Austin, How to do Things with Words (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).
112. John R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969), p. 56.
113. Joel Feinberg, Reason and Responsibility (Belmont, Calif.: Dickenson, 1965).
114. Peter Winch, The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958).
115. Eric D. Hirsch, Jr, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), p. 25
116. Eric D. Hirsch, Jr, Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), pp. 164 ff.
117. Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books, 1959).
118. G.E.M. Anscombe, Intention (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972).
119. A.I. Melden, Free Action (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961).
120. H.L.A. Hart, ‘The ascription of responsibility and rights’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 49 (1948), pp. 171-94.
121. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale (Paris: Plon, 1958)
122. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale, p. 241 [p. 217].
123. Jacques Ellul, ‘Le rôle médiateur de l’idéologie’, in Démythisation et idéologie, edited by E. Castelli (Paris: Aubier, 1973), pp. 335-54.
124. Jacques Ellul, ‘Le rôle médiateur de l’idéologie’, in Démythisation et idéologie, edited by E. Castelli (Paris: Aubier, 1973), p. 351.
125. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The German Ideology, edited by C.J. Arthur (London:Lawrence and Wishart, 1970), p. 47.
126. Maurice Lagueux, ‘L’usage abusif du rapport science/idéologie’, Culture et langage (Montreal:Cahiers du Québec, 1973), p. 202.
127. Maurice Lagueux, ‘L’usage abusif du rapport science/idéologie’, Culture et langage (Montreal:Cahiers du Québec, 1973), p. 219.
128. Maurice Lagueux, ‘L’usage abusif du rapport science/idéologie’, Culture et langage (Montreal:Cahiers du Québec, 1973), p. 217.
129. Sarah Kofman, Camera Obscura. De l’idéologie (Paris: Galilée, 1973).
130. Sarah Kofman, Camera Obscura. De l’idéologie (Paris: Galilée, 1973), p. 25.
131. Jean Ladrière, ‘Signes et concepts en science’ in L’Articulation du sens (Paris: Cerf, 1970), pp. 40-50
132. English translation: ‘Signs and concepts in science’ in Language and Belief, translated by Garrett Barden (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1972), pp. 17-43.
133. English translation: ‘Signs and concepts in science’ in Language and Belief, translated by Garrett Barden (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1972), p. 42 [p. 34].
134. Max Weber, ‘The meaning of “ethical neutrality” in sociology and economics’ in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1949), pp. 1-49.
135. Max Weber, ‘The meaning of “ethical neutrality” in sociology and economics’ in The Methodology of the Social Sciences, translated and edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1949), p. 43 [p. 36].
136. Karl Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie (Bonn: F. Cohen, 1929)
137. Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1927), p. 153
138. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1978), p. 195.
139. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits (Paris: Seuil, 1966), pp. 256, 839.
140. Jean Laplanche and J.-B. Pontalis, Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967), p. 33.
141. Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by Jeremy J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann, 1972), p. 247.
142. Alfred Lorenzer, Über den Gegenstand der Psychoanalyse (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1973).
143. Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, translated by Denis Savage (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1970).
144. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Language and image in psychoanalysis’ in Psychiatry and the Humanities III, edited by Joseph H. Smith (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).
145. Michael Sherwood, The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis (New York: Academic Press, 1969).
146. Michael Sherwood, The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis (New York: Academic Press, 1969), p. 172.
147. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Psychiatry and moral values’, in American Handbook of Psychiatry I, edited by S. Arieti et al. (New York: Basic Books, 1974).
148. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Fatherhood: From phantasm to symbol’, translated by Robert Sweeney, in The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, edited by Don Ihde (Evanston:Northwestern University Press, 1974).
149. Paul Ricoeur, ‘Fatherhood: From phantasm to symbol’, translated by Robert Sweeney, in The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, edited by Don Ihde (Evanston:Northwestern University Press, 1974), p. 169.
150. Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
151. W.B. Gallie, Philosophy and Historical Understanding (New York: Schocken Books, 1964).
152. Carl Hempel, ‘The function of general laws in history’ in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (New York: The Free Press, 1942), pp. 231-43.
153. Charles Frankel, ‘Explanation and interpretation in history’ in Theories of History, edited by Patrick Gardner (New York: The Free Press, 1959), pp. 409, 410.
154. W.B. Gallie, Philosophy and Historical Understanding (New York: Schocken Books, 1964).
155. W.B. Gallie, Philosophy and Historical Understanding (New York: Schocken Books, 1964), p. 66.
156. Louis O. Mink, ‘History and fiction as modes of comprehension’ in New Directions in Literary History, edited by Ralph Cohen (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p. 117.
157. Robert E. Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative (New York: Oxford University Press, 1966), p. 240.
158. Roland Barthes, ‘Introduction à l’analyse structurale du récit’, Communications, 8 (1966), pp. 1-27
159. English translation: ‘Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives’, in Image-Music-Text, edited and translated by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana/Collins, 1977), pp. 79-124.
160. A.J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode (Paris: Librarie Larousse, 1966).
161. Corina Galland, ‘Introduction à la méthode de A.J. Greimas’, Etudes théologiques et religieuses, 48 (1973), pp. 35-48.
162. A.J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale, p. 176.
163. A.J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale, p. 205.
164. A.J. Greimas, Sémantique structurale, p. 206.
165. Robert E. Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative, p. 57.
166. Robert E. Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative, p. 81.
167. Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 97.
168. Hayden White, ‘The historical text as literary artefact’, Clio, 3 (1974), pp. 277-303.
169. Stephan C. Pepper, World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942).
170. Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols (Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill, 1969), p. 241.