Equalizing privacy and specifying equality

Revisioning the Political: Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 181-192

  Eisenstein, Zillah ^a  

^a ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047160868     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429497612     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Bigge, Ellen. 1989. “The Fetal Rights Controversy: A Resurfacing of Sex Discrimination in the Guise of Fetal Protection.” University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 57 (2): 261-288.
2. Bowers v. Hardwick. 1986. 487 U.S. 186.
3. Boyd v. United States. 1886. 116 U.S. 616.
4. Brown, Wendy. 1992. “Finding the Man in the State.” Feminist Studies 18 (1): 7-34.
5. Crenshaw, Kimberle Williams. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 2 (1989): 139-167.
6. Des haney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services. 1989. 489 U.S. 189.
7. Dworkin, Ronald. 1987a. “The Bork Nomination.” New York Review of Books 34(13): 3-10.
8. Dworkin, Ronald. 1987b. “From Bork to Kennedy.” New York Review of Books 34 (20): 36-42.
9. Eisenstadt v. Baird. 1972. 405 U.S. 438.
10. Eisenstein, Zillah. 1989. Female Body and the Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Eisenstein, Zillah. 1994. The Color of Gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth. 1991. Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
13. Griswold v. Connecticut. 1965. 381 U.S. 479.
14. Harris v. McRae. 1980. 448 U.S. 297.
15. Hernes, Helga Maria. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power. New York: Oxford University Press/Norwegian University Press.
16. Hurtado, Aido. 1989. “Relating to Privilege: Seduction and Rejection in the Subordination of White Women and Women of Color.” Signs 14 (4): 833-855.
17. Hyde, Sue. 1989. “Sex and Politics: Challenging the Sodomy Laws.” Radical America 22 (5): 56-63.
18. Johnsen, Dawn. 1989. “From Driving to Drugs: Governmental Regulation of Pregnant Women’s Lives After Webster.” National Black Women’s Health Project, 12347 Gordon Street SW, Atlanta, GA 30310; and National Institute for Women of Color, 1301 20th St. NW, Washington, DC 10036.
19. Maherv. Rne. 1977.482 U.S. 464.
20. Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1990. Abortion and Women’s Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom. Revised. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
21. Piercev. Society of Sisters. 1925.168 U.S. 510.
22. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 1992. 112 S.Ct. 1791.
23. Poe v. Ullman. 1961. 367 U.S. 497.
24. Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113.
25. Rubenfeld, Jed. 1989. “The Right of Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 102 (4): 737-807.
26. Rust v. Sullivan. 1991. Ill S. Ct. 1759.
27. Rutherford, Charlotte. 1992. “Reproductive Freedoms and African American Women.” Yale journal of Law and Feminism 4 (1): 255-290.
28. Skinner v. Oklahoma. 1942. 316 U.S. 535.
29. Smith, Peggie R. 1991. “Separate Identities: Black Women, Work, and Title VII.” Harvard Women’s Law Journall4 (Spring): 21-75.
30. Solomon, Alisa. 1992. “Identity Crisis: Queer Politics in the Age of Possibilities.” Village Voice 37 (June 30): 27-33.
31. Trent, Judy Scales. 1989. “Black Women and the Constitution: Finding Our Place, Asserting Our Rights.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 24 (1): 9-44.
32. Warren, Samuel and Louis Brandeis. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4 (5): 193-220.
33. Webster v. Reproductive Health Service. 1989. 492 U.S. 490.
34. Wulf, Melvin. 1991. “On the Origins of Privacy.” Nation 252 (20): 700-704.