International and domestic institutions in the EMU process and beyond

The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 131-155

  Martin, Lisa L ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047159641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429494376     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Alesina, A., and V. Grilli, 1994, On the feasibility of a one-speed or multispeed European Monetary Union, in: B. Eichengreen and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 107-127.
2. Artis, M. J., 1992, The Maastricht road to monetary union. Journal of Common Market Studies 30, 299-309.
3. Artis, M., and B. Winkler, 1998, The stability pact: Safeguarding the credibility of the European Central Bank. National Institute Economic Review 163, 87-98.
4. Auken, S., J. Buksti, and C. L. Sorensen, 1975, Denmark joins Europe: Patterns of adaptation in the Danish political and administrative processes as a result of membership of the European Communities. Journal of Common Market Studies 14, 1-36.
5. Barnard, B., 1997, From Dublin to Amsterdam. Europe 363, E1-E2.
6. Bergman, T., 1997, National parliaments and EU Affairs Committees: Notes on empirical variation and competing explanations. Journal of European Public Policy 4, 373-387.
7. Bogdanor, V., 1989, The June 1989 European elections and the institutions of the Community. Government and Opposition 24, 199-214.
8. Borre, O., 1986, The Danish referendum on the EC Common Act. Electoral Studies 5, 189-193.
9. Bulmer, S., 1983, Domestic politics and European Community policy-making. Journal of Common Market Studies 21, 349-363.
10. Casella, A., 1992, Participation in a currency union. American Economic Review 82, 847-863.
11. Cohen, B. J., 1994, Beyond EMU: The problem of sustainability, in: B. Eichengreen and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 149-165.
12. de Haan, J., and L. Gormley, 1997, Independence and accountability of the European Central Bank, in: M. Andenas, et al, eds., European Economic and Monetary Union: The institutional framework (London: Kluwer Law International), 333-353.
13. De Smijter, E., 1998, The constitutional amendments made to the Treaty on European Union by the Treaty of Amsterdam, in: R. Blanpain, ed., Institutional changes and European social policies after the Treaty of Amsterdam (The Hague: Kluwer Law International), 183-229.
14. Dehousse, R., 1998, European institutional architecture after Amsterdam: Parliamentary system of regulatory structure? Working paper RSC 98/11, Florence, Robert Schumman Center.
15. Dornbusch, R., C. Farero, and F. Giavazzi, 1998, Immediate challenges for the ECB, in: D, Begg, et al, eds., EMU: Prospects and challenges for the euro (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).
16. Ehlermann, C. D., 1998, Differentiation, flexibility, closer cooperation: The new provisions of the Amsterdam treaty manuscript, Florence, Robert Schumann Center.
17. Eichengreen, B., and J. Frieden, 1994, The political economy of European monetary unification: An analytical introduction, in: B. Eichengreen and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 1-23.
18. Fitzmaurice, J., 1976, National parliaments and European policy-making: The case of Denmark. Parliamentary Affairs 29, 281-292.
19. Fitzmaurice, J., 1988, An analysis of the European Community’s co-operation procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 26, 389-400.
20. Garrett, G., 1992, International cooperation and institutional choice: The European Community’s internal market. International Organization 46, 533-560.
21. Garrett, G., 1994, The politics of Maastricht, in: B. Eichengreen and J. Frieden, eds., The political economy of European monetary unification (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 47-65.
22. Garrett, G., and G. Tsebelis, 1999, The institutional foundations of supranationalism in the EU, manuscript.
23. Gregory, F.E.C., 1983, Dilemmas of government: Britain and the European Community (Oxford: Martin Robertson).
24. Flaas, E. B., 1958, The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces, 1950-57 (London: Stevens & Sons).
25. Judge, D., 1995, The failure of national parliaments? West European Politics 18, 79-100.
26. Keohane, R. Q., 1984, After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
27. Keohane, R. O., and S. Hoffmann, 1991, Institutional change in Europe in the 1980s, in: R. O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann, eds., The new European community: Decisionmaking and institutional change (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 1-39.
28. Kenen, R, 1999, The outlook for EMU. Eastern Economic Journal 25, 109-115.
29. Kolinsky, M., 1975, Parliamentary scrutiny of European legislation. Government and Opposition 10, 46-69.
30. Lange, R, 1993, Maastricht and the social protocol: Why did they do it? Politics and Society 21, 5-36.
31. Lastra, R. M., 1997, European Monetary Union and Central Bank independence, in: M. Andenas, et ah, eds, European Economic and Monetary Union: The institutional framework (London: Kluwer Law International), 291-329.
32. Laursen, R, 1992, Explaining the intergovernmental conference on political union, in: R Laursen and S. Vanhoonacker, eds., The intergovernmental conference on political union: Institutional reforms, new policies and international identity of the European Community (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht), 229-248.
33. Lipson, C, 1991, Why are some international agreements informal? International Organization 45, 495-538.
34. Murks, G., 1992, Structural policy in the European Community, in: A. M. Sbragia, ed., Euro-Politics: Institutions and policymaking in the “new” European Community (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution), 191-224.
35. Martin, L. L., 1992, Institutions and cooperation: Sanctions during the Falkland Islands conflict. International Security 16, 143-178.
36. Martin, L. L., 2000, Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international cooperation (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
37. McCubbins, M., R. Noll, and B. Weingast, 1989, Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review 75, 431-482.
38. Mezey, M., 1995, Parliament in the New Europe, in: J. Hayward and E. C. Page, eds., Governing the new Europe (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press).
39. Miller, H. N., 1977, The influence of British parliamentary committees on European Community legislation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2, 45-75.
40. Moller, J. O., 1983, Danish EC decision-making: An insider’s view, Journal of Common Market Studies 21, 245-260.
41. Moravcsik, A., 1991, Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization 45, 19-56.
42. Moravscik, A., and K. Nicolaidis, 1999, Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, influence, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 37, 59-85.
43. Morrow, J. D., 1992, Signaling difficulties with linkage in crisis bargaining. International Studies Quarterly 36, 153-172.
44. Niblock, M., 1971, The EEC: National parliaments in Community decision-making (London: Chatham House).
45. Nugent, N., 1991, The government and politics of the European Community, 2d ed. (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press).
46. Nugent, N., 1992, The deepening and widening of the European Community: Recent evolution, Maastricht, and beyond. Journal of Common Market Studies 30, 311-328.
47. Oye, K. A., 1992, Economic discrimination and political exchange: World political economy in the 1930s and 1980s (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
48. Petersen, N., and J. Elklit, 1973, Denmark enters the European Communities. Scandinavian Political Studies 8, 198-213.
49. Putnam, R. D., 1988, Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42, 427-460.
50. Sebenius, J. K., 1983, Negotiation arithmetic: Adding and subtracting issues and parties. International Organization 37, 281-316.
51. Stevens, A., 1976-1977, Problems of parliamentary control of European Community policy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 5, 269-281.
52. Tollison, R. D., and T. D. Willett, 1979, An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkage in international negotiations. International Organization 33, 425-449.
53. Tsebelis, G., 1994, The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter. American Political Science Review 88, 128-142.
54. von Hagen, J., 1997, Monetary policy and institutions in the EMU. Swedish Economic Policy Review 4.
55. Wallace, TL, 1973, National governments and the European Communities (London: Chatham House).
56. Wallace, TL, 1975, The foreign policy process in Britain (London: Royal insti tute of International Affairs).
57. Waltz, K., 1967, Foreign policy and democratic politics: The American and British experience (Boston: Little, Brown).
58. Weber, S., and H. Wiesmeth, 1991, Issue linkage in the European Community. Journal of Common Market Studies 29, 255-267.
59. Williams, D., and R. Reid, 1998, A Central Bank for Europe, in: P, Temperton, ed, The euro, 2d ed. (Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons), 123-144.
60. Williams, S., 1991, Sovereignty and accountability in the European Community, in: R. O. Keohane and S. Hoffmann, eds., The new European Community. Decisionmaking and institutional change (Boulder, Colo.: Westview), 155-176.
61. Worre, T., 1988, Denmark at the crossroads: The Danish referendum of 28 February 1986 on the EC reform package, Journal of Common Market Studies 26, 361-388.