A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services supply and trade-offs in European wood-pastures

Science Advances

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2018, Pages

  Torralba, Mario ^a   Fagerholm, Nora ^b,c   Hartel, Tibor ^d,e   Moreno, Gerardo ^f   Plieninger, Tobias ^a,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^d BABE BOLYAI UNIVERSITY   (Romania)

^e SAPIENTIA HUNGARIAN UNIVERSITY OF TRANSYLVANIA   (Romania)

^f UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; CULTIVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; FARMS; WOOD;

CONSERVATION POLICY; ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LONG-TERM INTERACTION; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES; PASTURE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; HUMAN; THEORETICAL MODEL; WOOD;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; EUROPE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WOOD;

EID: 85047158665     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23752548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar2176     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. T. Hartel, T. Plieninger, European Wood-Pastures in Transition: A Social-Ecological Approach (Earthscan from Routledge, 2014).
2. T. Plieninger, T. Hartel, B. Martín-López, G. Beaufoy, E. Bergmeier, K. Kirby, M. J. Montero, G. Moreno, E. Oteros-Rozas, J. V. Uytvanck, Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biol. Conserv. 190, 70-79 (2015).
3. M. Torralba, N. Fagerholm, P. J. Burgess, G. Moreno, T. Plieninger, Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 230, 150-161 (2016).
4. L. Huntsinger, J. L. Oviedo, Ecosystem services are social-ecological services in a traditional pastoral system: The case of California's Mediterranean rangelands. Ecol. Soc. 19, 8 (2014).
5. D. Jørgensen, P. Quelch, The origins and history of medieval wood-pastures, in European Wood-Pastures in Transition: A Social-Ecological Approach, T. Hartel, T. Plieninger, Eds. (Earthscan from Routledge, 2014), pp. 55-69.
6. E. Bergmeier, J. Petermann, E. Schröder, Geobotanical survey of wood-pasture habitats in Europe: Diversity, threats and conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 2995-3014 (2010).
7. R. Oppermann, Wood-pastures as examples of European high nature value landscapes-functions and differentiations according to farming, in European Wood-Pastures in Transition: A Social-Ecological Approach, T. Hartel, T. Plieninger, Eds. (Earthscan from Routledge, 2014), pp. 39-52.
8. M. N. Bugalho, M. C. Caldeira, J. S. Pereira, J. Aronson, J. G. Pausas, Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 278-286 (2011).
9. C. Stoate, A. Báldi, P. Beja, N. D. Boatman, I. Herzon, A. van Doorn, G. R. de Snoo, L. Rakosy, C. Ramwell, Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe-A review. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 22-46 (2009).
10. T. Plieninger, C. Bieling, Resilience-based perspectives to guiding high-nature-value farmland through socioeconomic change. Ecol. Soc. 18, 20 (2013).
11. E. M. Bignal, D. I. McCracken, The nature conservation value of European traditional farming systems. Environ. Rev. 8, 149-171 (2000).
12. P. Campos, L. Huntsinger, J. L. Oviedo, P. F. Starrs, M. DIaz, R. B. Standiford, G. Montero, Mediterranean Oak Woodland Working Landscapes (Springer Netherlands, 2013), vol. 16.
13. A. Fischer, A. Eastwood, Coproduction of ecosystem services as human-nature interactions-An analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52, 41-50 (2016).
14. I. Palomo, M. R. Felipe-Lucia, E. M. Bennett, B. Martín-López, U. Pascual, Chapter Six - Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. Adv. Ecol. Res. 54, 245-283 (2016).
15. A. D. Manning, J. Fischer, D. B. Lindenmayer, Scattered trees are keystone structures-Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 132, 311-321 (2006).
16. P. Garrido, P. Garrido, M. Elbakidze, P. Angelstam, T. Plieninger, F. Pulido, G. Moreno, Stakeholder perspectives of wood-pasture ecosystem services: A case study from Iberian dehesas. Land Use Policy 60, 324-333 (2017).
17. N. Fagerholm, E. Oteros-Rozas, C. M. Raymond, M. Torralba, G. Moreno, T. Plieninger, Assessing linkages between ecosystem services, land-use and well-being in an agroforestry landscape using public participation GIS. Appl. Geogr. 74, 30-46 (2016).
18. F. Sereke, A. R. Graves, D. Dux, J. H. N. Palma, F. Herzog, Innovative agroecosystem goods and services: Key profitability drivers in Swiss agroforestry. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 759-770 (2015).
19. S. Pagiola, E. Ramírez, J. Gobbi, C. de Haan, M. Ibrahim, E. Murgueitio, J. P. Ruíz, Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecol. Econ. 64, 374-385 (2007).
20. M. R. Felipe-Lucia, F. A. Comín, E. M. Bennett, Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol. Soc. 19, 20 (2014).
21. J. P. Rodríguez, T. Douglas Beard Jr., E. M. Bennett, G. S. Cumming, S. J. Cork, J. Agard, A. P. Dobson, G. D. Peterson, Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 11, 28 (2006).
22. J. Maes, B. Egoh, L. Willemen, C. Liquete, P. Vihervaara, J. P. Schägner, B. Grizzetti, E. G. Drakou, A. La Notte, G. Zulian, F. Bouraoui, M. L. Paracchini, L. Braat, G. Bidoglio, Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 31-39 (2012).
23. B. Martín-López, I. Iniesta-Arandia, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, I. Casado-Arzuaga, D. García Del Amo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Oteros-Rozas, I. Palacios-Agundez, B. Willaarts, J. A. González, F. Santos-Martín, M. Onaindia, C. López-Santiago, C. Montes, Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLOS ONE 7, e38970 (2012).
24. E. Andersson, T. Mcphearson, P. Kremer, E. Gomez-Baggethun, Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 157-164 (2015).
25. A. G. Power, Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2959-2971 (2010).
26. C. Raudsepp-Hearne, G. D. Peterson, E. M. Bennett, Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 5242-5247 (2010).
27. J. M. Ament, C. A. Moore, M. Herbst, G. S. Cumming, Cultural ecosystem services in protected areas: Understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies. Conserv. Lett. 10, 440-450 (2017).
28. F. Baró, E. Gómez-Baggethun, D. Haase, Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosyst. Serv. 24, 147-159 (2017).
29. C. Queiroz, M. Meacham, K. Richter, A. V. Norström, E. Andersson, J. Norberg, G. Peterson, Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44, 89-101 (2015).
30. A. F. Cord, B. Bartkowski, M. Beckmann, A. Dittrich, K. Hermans-Neumann, A. Kaim, N. Lienhoop, K. Locher-Krause, J. Priess, C. Schröter-Schlaack, N. Schwarz, R. Seppelt, M. Strauch, T. Václavík, M. Volk, Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 264-272 (2017).
31. R. J. F. Burton, G. Schwarz, Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change. Land Use Policy 30, 628-641 (2013).
32. R. Siebert, M. Toogood, A. Knierim, Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociol. Ruralis. 46, 318-340 (2006).
33. J. Ahnström, J. Höckert, H. L. Bergea, C. Francis, P. Skelton, L. Hallgren, Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 24, 38-47 (2009).
34. T. Birge, I. Herzon, Motivations and experiences in managing rare semi-natural biotopes: A case from Finland. Land Use Policy 41, 128-137 (2014).
35. E. Ostrom, A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419-422 (2009).
36. M. A. Mouchet, M. A. Mouchet, P. Lamarque, B. Martín-López, E. Crouzat, P. Gos, C. Byczek, S. Lavorel, An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 28, 298-308 (2014).
37. E. Andersson, B. Nykvist, R. Malinga, F. Jaramillo, R. Lindborg, A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. Ambio 44, 102-112 (2015).
38. P. Garrido, M. Elbakidze, P. Angelstam, Stakeholders' perceptions on ecosystem services in Östergötland's (Sweden) threatened oak wood-pasture landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 158, 96-104 (2017).
39. T. Hartel, I. Dorresteijn, C. Klein, O. Máthé, C. I. Moga, K. Öllerer, M. Roellig, H. von Wehrden, J. Fischer, Wood-pastures in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe: Characteristics, management and status. Biol. Conserv. 166, 267-275 (2013).
40. T. Hartel, J. Fischer, C. Câmpeanu, A. I. Milcu, J. Hanspach, I. Fazey, The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania. Ecol. Soc. 19, 42 (2014).
41. T. Hartel, J. Hanspach, C. I. Moga, L. Holban, Á. Szapanyos, R. Tamás, C. Hováth, K. O. Réti, Abundance of large old trees in wood-pastures of Transylvania (Romania). Sci. Total Environ. 613-614, 263-270 (2017).
42. T. Hartel, K.-O. Réti, C. Craioveanu, Valuing scattered trees from wood-pastures by farmers in a traditional rural region of Eastern Europe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 236, 304-311 (2017).
43. X. Deng, Z. Li, J. Gibson, A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 953-968 (2016).
44. T. Tscharntke, A. M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter, C. Thies, Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8, 857-874 (2005).
45. J. Bjö Rklund, K. E. Limburg, T. Rydberg, Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: An example from Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 29, 269-291 (1999).
46. J. Bengtsson, S. G. Nilsson, A. Franc, P. Menozzi, Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 132, 39-50 (2000).
47. M. E. Kragt, M. J. Robertson, Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecol. Econ. 102, 147-157 (2014).
48. G. Moreno, G. Gonzalez-Bornay, F. Pulido, M. L. Lopez-Diaz, M. Bertomeu, E. Juárez, M. Diaz, Exploring the causes of high biodiversity of Iberian dehesas: The importance of wood pastures and marginal habitats. Agrofor. Syst. 90, 87-105 (2016).
49. C. Howe, H. Suich, B. Vira, G. M. Mace, Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob. Environ. Chang. 28, 263-275 (2014).
50. J. Cavender-Bares, S. Polasky, E. King, P. Balvanera, A sustainability framework for assessing trade-offs in ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 20, 17 (2015).
51. P. Gaspar, F. J. Mesías, M. Escribano, F. Pulido, Sustainability in Spanish extensive farms (dehesas): An economic and management indicator-based evaluation. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 62, 153-162 (2009).
52. European Commission, Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244 (2011).
53. A. Bryman, Social Research Methods (Oxford Univ. Press, ed. 5, 2016).
54. F. Herzog, K. Balázs, P. Dennis, J. Friedel, I. Geijzendorffer, P. Jeanneret, M. Kainz, P. Pointereau, Biodiversity Indicators for European Farming Systems (Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ART, 2012).
55. J. Stephenson, The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 84, 127-139 (2008).
56. I. Brown, P. Harrison, J. Ashley, P. Berry, M. Everard, Robust Response Options: What Response Options Might Be Used to Improve Policy (UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on Work Package Report 8, 2014).
57. M. Chavent, V. Kuentz-Simonet, A. Labenne, J. Saracco, Multivariate analysis of mixed data: The R Package PCAmixdata, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4911 (2014).
58. S. Gabriel, A. S. Kydes, A nonlinear complementarity approach for the National Energy Modeling System. Math. Comput. Sci. Div. (1995).
59. H. Abdi, D. Valentin, Multiple factor analysis (MFA). Encycl. Meas. Stat. (2007).
60. S. Addinsoft, XLSTAT software, version 9.0 (2009).