Feminist contract arianism

A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 337-368

  Hampton, Jean ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047135557     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429502682     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Annette C. Baier, “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?" Nous 19, 1 (March 1985): 56.
2. Annette C. Baier, “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?" Nous 19, 1 (March 1985), p. 54.
3. Ian Hacking, “Winner Take Less: A Review of The Evolution of Cooperation by Robert Axelrod,” in New York Review of Books, June 28, 1984.
4. Baier, “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?" p. 55.
5. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, tr. by T. E. Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985), 1155a22 (p. 208).
6. Carol Gilligan’s classic work is In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982).
7. Carol Gilligan, “Moral Orientation and Moral Development,” in Women and Moral Theory, ed. by Eva Feder Kittay and Diana T. Meyers (Totowa, N.J.:Rowman and Littlefield, 1987), pp. 19-33.
8. Gilligan, In a Different Voice, pp. 35-36.
9. Gilligan, In a Different Voice, p. 36.
10. Baier, “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory,” p. 62.
11. Annette Baier, “The Need for More Than Justice,” in Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, ed. Marsha Hanen and Kai Nielsen (Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1987), p. 54.
12. Gilligan, In a Different Voice, p. 36.
13. L. Blum, M. Homiak, J. Housman, and N. Scheman, “Altruism and Women’s Oppression,” in Women and Philosophy, ed. by Carol Gould and Marx Wartofsky (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1976), pp. 222-247.
14. Charlotte Bronte, Shirley, quotation taken from edition of Andrew and Judith Hook (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987) p. 190.
15. From “Professions for Women” in The Virginia Woolf Reader, ed. by Mitchell A. Leaska (San Diego: Harcourt Brace, 1984), pp. 278-279.
16. Susan Wolf in her “Moral Saints,” journal of Philosophy, 79, 8 (August 1982): 419-439.
17. DuBois, Dunlap, Carol Gilligan, Catharine MacKinnon and Menkel-Meadow in “Feminist Discourse, Moral Values, and the Law,” Buffalo Law Review 34 (1985): llff.
18. Virginia Held, “Noncontractual Society: A Feminist View,” in Hanen and Nielsen, eds., Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, p. 111.
19. Virginia Held, “Noncontractual Society: A Feminist View,” in Hanen and Nielsen, eds., Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, p. 113.
20. Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Palo Alto, Calif: Polity/Stanford University Press, 1988).
21. Baier, “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?,” p. 62.
22. “Social Contract as Ideology,'" Philosophy and Public Affairs (1977):130-164.
23. Hobbes, Leviathan, chapter 10
24. Immanuel Kant, On the Common Saying: “This May Be True in Theory, But It Doesn’t Apply in Practice,'' in Kant’s Political Writings, ed. by Hans Reiss (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 63.
25. Rawls, A Theory of Justice [Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971], section 40
26. Scanlon’s “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” in Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. by A. Sen and B. Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
27. Klaus Thewelweit, Male Fantasies (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), p. 364.
28. Kathryn Morgan, “Women and Moral Madness,'' in Harren and Nielsen, eds., Science, Morality and Feminist Theory, pp. 201-226.
29. Susan Moller Okin, justice, Gender, and the Family, (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
30. Susan Moller Okin, justice, Gender, and the Family, (New York: Basic Books, 1989), p. 101.
31. John Harsanyi, “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s A Theory ofj ustice,” American Political Science Review 69 (1975): 594-606.
32. D. Clayton Hubin, “Minimizing Maximin,” Philosophical Studies 37 (1980): 363-372.
33. Scanlon, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” p. 110.
34. Scanlon, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,”, pp. 123-124.
35. Scanlon, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” p. 123.
36. Scanlon, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” p. 111.
37. Scanlon, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” p. 127.
38. Marilyn Friedman, “Beyond Caring: The Demoralization of Gender,” in Harren and Nielsen, eds., Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, p. 100
39. David Gauthier, Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 11.
40. Jean Hampton, “Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?" journal of Philosophy 77,6 Gune 1980.
41. Carol Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1988), p. 184.
42. Marjorie Schultz, “Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy,” California Law Review 70 (1982): 207-334.
43. Joan Ringelheim, “Women and the Holocaust: A Reconsideration of Research,” Signs 10, 4 (1985): 741-761.
44. Barbara Houston, “Rescuing Womanly Virtues:Some Dangers of Moral Reclamation,” in Hanen and Nielsen, eds., Science, Morality, and Feminist Theory, p. 248.
45. Will Kyrnlicka, “Two Theories of Justice,” Inquiry 33, 109-110
46. Sara Ruddick, “Maternal Thinking,” in Women and Values, ed. by M. Pearsall (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1986), p. 344