Comparison of patient satisfaction with incision cosmesis after standard and minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1-5

  Goldstein, Wayne M ^a   Ali, Rose ^a   Branson, Jill Jasperson ^a   Berland, Kimberly A ^a  

^a ILLINOIS BONE AND JOINT INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLASTIC SURGERY; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HUMANS; ILLINOIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85046983533     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080401-11     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kreuzer S. Minimally invasive hip surgery - are they all created equal? In: US Musculoskeletal Review 2006. London, England: Touch Briefings; 2006:21-24.
2. Porucznik MA. Award-winning study debunks advantages of two-incision THA. AAOS Now. 2007; 1(1):45.
3. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ, Berland KA, Gordon AC. Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(suppl 4):33-38. (Pubitemid 37383723)
4. Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Henry MC. Wound registry: development and validation [published correction appears in Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26(4):532]. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25(5):675-685.
5. Hollander JE, Valentine SM, McCuskey CF, Turque T, Singer AJ. Long-term evaluation of cosmetic appearance of repaired lacerations: validation of telephone assessment: the Stony Brook Wound Registry Group. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31(1):92-98. (Pubitemid 28037601)
6. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35(2):153-162. (Pubitemid 38438342)
7. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S, Lyman S, Madsen M, Sculco TP. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(5):538-545. (Pubitemid 38993180)
8. Sculco TP, Jordan LC, Walter WL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35(2):137-142. (Pubitemid 38438340)
9. Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35(2):143-151. (Pubitemid 38438341)
10. Irving JF. Direct two-incision total hip replacement without fluoroscopy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35(2):173-181. (Pubitemid 38438344)
11. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacement performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(7):1353-1358. (Pubitemid 38886521)
12. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, Park EH, Lorenz HP. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (441):80-85. (Pubitemid 44384207)