Gene expression profiling through microarray analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana colonized by pseudomonas putida MTCC5279, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 235-245

  Srivastava, Suchi ^a   Chaudhry, Vasvi ^a   Mishra, Aradhana ^a   Chauhan, Puneet Singh ^a   Rehman, Ateequr ^a   Yadav, Archana ^a   Tuteja, Narendra ^b   Nautiyal, Chandra Shekhar ^a  

^a CSIR NATIONAL BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Induced systemic resistance; Plant growth promoting bacteria

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA; RHIZOBIUM;

ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GROWTH PROMOTOR; PLANT DNA;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MEIOSIS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; MITOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DNA, PLANT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GROWTH SUBSTANCES; MEIOSIS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MITOSIS; PSEUDOMONAS PUTIDA;

EID: 85046982558     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.18957     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcón R, Azcón-Aguilar C. Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 2005; 56:1761-78 PMID:15911555; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri197
2. Loper JE. Influence of bacterial sources of indole3-acetic acid on root elongation of sugar beet. Phytopathology 1986; 76:76-386; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-76-386
3. Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R. Tryptophandependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20:619-26 PMID:17555270; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-6-0619
4. Joo G-J, Kim Y-M, Kim J-T, Rhee I-K, Kim J-H, Lee I-J. Gibberellins-producing rhizobacteria increase endogenous gibberellins content and promote growth of red peppers. J Microbiol 2005; 43:510-5 PMID: 16410767
5. Ortíz-Castro R, Valencia-Cantero E, López-Bucio J. Plant growth promotion by Bacillus megaterium involves cytokinin signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2008; 3:263-5 PMID:19704649; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.4.5204
6. Pieterse CMJ, Van Pelt JA, Ton J, Parchmann S, Mueller MJ, Buchala AJ, et al. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2000; 57:123-34 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.2000.0291
7. Glick BR, Todorovic B, Czarny J, Cheng Z, Duan J, McConkey B. Promotion of plant growth by bacterial ACC deaminase. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2007; 26:227-42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680701572966
8. Nautiyal CS. Selection of Chickpea-Rhizosphere-Competent Pseudomonas fluorescensNBRI1303 Antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, Rhizoctonia bataticola and Pythium sp. Curr Microbiol 1997; 35:52-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002849900211
9. de Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ. Phosphatesolubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not phosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.). Biol Fertil Soils 1997; 24:358-64 http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s003740050258
10. Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ 2009; 32:1682-94 PMID:19671096; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x
11. SaleemM, ArshadM,Hussain S, Bhatti AS. Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 34:635-48 PMID:17665234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0240-6
12. van Loon LC, Bakker PA, Pieterse CM. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1998; 36:453-83 PMID:15012509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453
13. Heil M, Bostock RM. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann Bot 2002; 89:503-12 PMID:12099523; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf076
14. Berg G. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009; 84:11-8 PMID:19568745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2092-7
15. Pieterse CM, van Wees SC, Hoffland E, van Pelt JA, van Loon LC. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell 1996; 8:1225-37 PMID:8776893
16. Van Wees SC, Pieterse CM, Trijssenaar A, Van't Westende YA, Hartog F, Van Loon LC. Differential induction of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis by biocontrol bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1997; 10:716-24 PMID:9245833; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.6.716
17. Knoester M, Pieterse CM, Bol JF, Van Loon LC. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by rhizobacteria requires ethylene-dependent signaling at the site of application. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 1999; 12:720-7 PMID:10475689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.8.720
18. Li W, Estrada-de los Santos, P, Matthijs S, Xie GL, Busson R, Cornelis P, et al. Promysalin, a salicylatecontaining Pseudomonas putida antibiotic, promotes surface colonization and selectively targets other Pseudomonas. Chem Biol 2011; 18:1320-30 PMID: 22035801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.08.006
19. Wu X, Monchy S, Taghavi S, Zhu W, Ramos J, van der Lelie D. Comparative genomics and functional analysis of niche-specific adaptation in Pseudomonas putida. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2011; 35:299-323 PMID:20796030; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00249.x
20. Wang Y, Ohara Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, Mayama S. Microarray analysis of the gene expression profile induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601-T5 in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2005; 18:385-96 PMID:15915637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-18-0385
21. Paszkowski U. A journey through signaling in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses 2006. New Phytol 2006; 172:35-46 PMID:16945087; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01840.x
22. Johnson JM, Oelmüller R. Mutualism or parasitism: life in an unstable continuum. Endocytobiosis Cell Res 2009; 19:81-111.
23. Mahajan S, Tuteja N. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 2005; 444:139-58 PMID:16309626; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2005.10.018
24. Tuteja N. Integrated calcium signaling in plants, In Signaling in plants, Baluska F and Mancuso S, eds. (Springer-Verloag Press, Germany) 2009; 29-49.
25. Newman EI, Reddel P. The distribution of mycorrhizas among families of vascular plants. New Phytol 1987; 106:745-51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00175.x
26. Prikryl Z, Vancura V, Wurst M. Auxin formation by rhizosphere bacteria as a factor of root growth. Biol Plant 1985; 27:159-63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02902155
27. Bottini R, Cassán F, Piccoli P. Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004; 65:497-503 PMID:15378292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1696-1
28. López-Bucio J, Campos-Cuevas JC, Hernández- Calderón E, Velásquez-Becerra C, Farías-Rodríguez R, Macías-Rodríguez LI, et al. Bacillus megaterium rhizobacteria promote growth and alter root-system architecture through an auxin- and ethylene-independent signaling mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20:207-17 PMID:17313171; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-2-0207
29. Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ. Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2001; 4:343-50 PMID: 11418345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00183-7
30. Espinosa-Urgel M. Plant-associated Pseudomonas populations: molecular biology, DNA dynamics, and gene transfer. Plasmid 2004; 52:139-50 PMID:15518872; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.06.004
31. Desbrosses G, Contesto C, Varoquaux F, Galland M, Touraine B. PGPR-Arabidopsis interactions is a useful system to study signaling pathways involved in plant developmental control. Plant Signal Behav 2009; 4:321-3 PMID:19794852; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.4.8106
32. Cuvier O, Hirano T. A role of topoisomerase II in linking DNA replication to chromosome condensation. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:645-55; PMID:12604590; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200209023
33. Singh BN, Mudgil Y, Sopory SK, Reddy MK. Molecular characterization of a nuclear topoisomerase II from Nicotiana tabacum that functionally complements a temperature-sensitive topoisomerase II yeast mutant. Plant Mol Biol 2003; 52:1063-76 PMID:14558665; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025427700337
34. Mo X, Zhu Q, Li X, Li J, Zeng Q, Rong H, et al. The hpa1 mutant of Arabidopsis reveals a crucial role of histidine homeostasis in root meristem maintenance. Plant Physiol 2006; 141:1425-35 PMID:16815950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.084178
35. Gao Z, Wen CK, Binder BM, Chen YF, Chang J, Chiang YH, et al. Heteromeric interactions among ethylene receptors mediate signaling in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:23801-10 PMID:18577522; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M800641200
36. Yadav V, Kumar M, Deep DK, Kumar H, Sharma R, Tripathi T, et al. A phosphate transporter from the root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica plays a role in phosphate transport to the host plant. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:26532-44 PMID:20479005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.111021
37. Verhagen BWM, Glazebrook J, Zhu T, Chang H-S, van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ. The transcriptome of rhizobacteriainduced systemic resistance in arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2004; 17:895-908 PMID:15305611; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.8.895
38. Tuteja N, Mahajan S. Calcium signaling network in plants: an overview. Plant Signal Behav 2007; 2:79-85 PMID:19516972; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.2.4176
39. Vadassery J, Oelmüller R. Calcium signaling in pathogenic and beneficial plant microbe interactions: what can we learn from the interaction between Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 2009; 4:215-6 PMID:19721753; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.11.9800
40. Choi HI, Park HJ, Park JH, Kim S, Im MY, Seo HH, et al. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase AtCPK32 interacts with ABF4, a transcriptional regulator of abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, and modulates its activity. Plant Physiol 2005; 139:1750-61 PMID: 16299177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.069757
41. Zhou R, Cutler AJ, Ambrose SJ, Galka MM, Nelson KM, Squires TM, et al. A new abscisic acid catabolic pathway. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:361-9 PMID: 14671016; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.030734
42. Tuteja N. Abscisic Acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2007; 2:135-8 PMID:19516981; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.2.3.4156
43. Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. Perception and transduction of abscisic acid signals: keys to the function of the versatile plant hormone ABA. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12:343-51 PMID:17629540; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.013
44. Matakiadis T, Alboresi A, Jikumaru Y, Tatematsu K, Pichon O, Renou J-P, et al. The Arabidopsis abscisic acid catabolic gene CYP707A2 plays a key role in nitrate control of seed dormancy. Plant Physiol 2009; 149:949-60 PMID:19074630; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.126938
45. Saito S, Hirai N, Matsumoto C, Ohigashi H, Ohta D, Sakata K, et al. Arabidopsis CYP707As encode (+)-abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in the oxidative catabolism of abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:1439-49 PMID:15064374; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.037614
46. Christmann A, Moes D, Himmelbach A, Yang Y, Tang Y, Grill E. Integration of abscisic acid signalling into plant responses. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2006; 8:314-25 PMID: 16807823; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-924120
47. Okamoto M, Kuwahara A, Seo M, Kushiro T, Asami T, Hirai N, et al. CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2006; 141:97-107 PMID: 16543410; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.079475
48. Cartieaux F, Contesto C, Gallou A, Desbrosses G, Kopka J, Taconnat L, et al. Simultaneous interaction of Arabidopsis thaliana with Bradyrhizobium Sp. Strain ORS278 and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoDC3000 leads to complex transcriptome changes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2008; 21:244-59 PMID:18184068; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-2-0244
49. Ton J, Davison S, Van Wees SC, Van Loon L, Pieterse CM. The arabidopsis ISR1 locus controlling rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance is involved in ethylene signaling. Plant Physiol 2001; 125:652-61 PMID:11161023; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.2.652
50. Tuominen H, Overmyer K, Keinänen M, Kollist H, Kangasjärvi J. Mutual antagonism of ethylene and jasmonic acid regulates ozone-induced spreading cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2004; 39:59-69 PMID: 15200642; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02107.x
51. Verhagen BWM, Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M, Höfte M, Aziz A. Pseudomonas spp.-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea is associated with induction and priming of defence responses in grapevine. J Exp Bot 2010; 61:249-60 PMID:19812243; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp295
52. Stein E, Molitor A, Kogel KH, Waller F. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis conferred by the mycorrhizal fungus Piriformospora indica requires jasmonic acid signaling and the cytoplasmic function of NPR1. Plant Cell Physiol 2008; 49:1747-51 PMID:18842596; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn147
53. Lorković ZJ, Herrmann RG, Oelmüller R. PRH75, anew nucleus-localized member of the DEAD-box protein family from higher plants. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2257-65 PMID:9121476
54. Kushwaha HR, Singh AK, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A. Genome wide expression analysis of CBS domain containing proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh and Oryza sativa L. reveals their developmental and stress regulation. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:200 PMID:19400948; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-200
55. Sanan-Mishra N, Pham XH, Sopory SK, Tuteja N. Pea DNA helicase 45 overexpression in tobacco confers high salinity tolerance without affecting yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:509-14 PMID:15630095; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406485102
56. Krizek BA, Meyerowitz EM. The Arabidopsis homeotic genes APETALA3 and PISTILLATA are sufficient to provide the B class organ identity function. Development 1996; 122:11-22 PMID:8565821
57. Zik M, Irish VF. Global identification of target genes regulated by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA floral homeotic gene action. Plant Cell 2003; 15:207-22 PMID:12509532; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc. 006353
58. Li W, Chen C, Markmann-Mulisch U, Timofejeva L, Schmelzer E, Ma H, et al. The Arabidopsis AtRAD51 gene is dispensable for vegetative development but required for meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:10596-601 PMID:15249667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404110101
59. Minorsky PV. A gene involved in homologous recombination. Plant Physiol 2005; 139:561-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.900175
60. Guo Y, Gan S. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J 2006; 46:601-12 PMID:16640597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02723.x
61. Kunieda T, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M, Takeda S, Aida M, Tasaka M, et al. NAC family proteins NARS1/ NAC2 and NARS2/NAM in the outer integument regulate embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008; 20:2631-42 PMID:18849494; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.060160
62. Camehl I, Sherameti I, Venus Y, Bethke G, Varma A, Lee J, et al. Ethylene signalling and ethylene-targeted transcription factors are required to balance beneficial and nonbeneficial traits in the symbiosis between the endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica and Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 2010; 185:1062-73 PMID:20085621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03149.x
63. Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic Acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991; 57:535-8 PMID:16348419
64. Mehta S, Nautiyal CS. An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Curr Microbiol 2001; 43:51-6 PMID:11375664; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002840010259
65. Nautiyal CS, Rehman A, Chauhan PS. Environmental Escherichia coli occur as natural plant growth-promoting soil bacterium. Arch Microbiol 2010; 192:185-93 PMID:20084366; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-010-0544-1
66. Bengtsson A, Bengtsson H. Microarray image analysis: background estimation using quantile and morphological filters. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:96 PMID: 16504173; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-96
67. Loguinov AV, Mian IS, Vulpe CD. Exploratory differential gene expression analysis in microarray experiments with no or limited replication. Genome Biol 2004; 5:R18 PMID:15003121; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-3-r18