The design space of input devices

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 1990, Pages 117-124

  Card, Stuart K ^a   Mackinlay, Jock D ^a   Robertson, George G ^a  

^a PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Design knowledge systematization; Input devices; Semantics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTEGRATION TESTING; SEMANTICS; TAXONOMIES;

DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN SPACES; FIGURES OF MERITS; GRAPHICAL PRESENTATIONS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; INPUT DEVICES; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC INTEGRATION;

KNOBS;

EID: 85046957514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/97243.97263     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Albert, A., (1982). The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning task. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society-26th Annual Meeting, pp. 54-58.
2. Anson, E. (1982). The device model of interaction. Computer Graphics, 16(3), 107-114. Also, SIGGRAPH'82 Proceedings.
3. Baecker, R. M., & Buxton, W. (Eds.), (1987). Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 357-365.
4. Buxton, W. (1983). Lexical and pragmatic considerations of input structures. Computer Graphics 17(1), 31-37.
5. Card, S. K., English, W. K, & Burr, B. J. (1978). Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 601-613.
6. Card, S. K. (1989). Human factors and artificial intelligence. In P. A. Hanccock & M. H. Chignell (Eds.), Intelligent interfaces: theory, research and design. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland).
7. English, W. K., Engelbart, D. C, & Berman, M. L. (1967). Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-8, 5-15.
8. Epps, B., Snyder, H., & Mutol, W. (1986). Comparison of six cursor devices on a target acquisition task. Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, pp. 302-5.
9. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 381-391.
10. Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., & Chan, P. (1984). The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 4(11), 13-48.
11. Karat, J., McDonald, J., & Anderson, M. (1985). A comparison of selection techniques: touch panel, mouse and keyboard. In B. Shacket (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 84, pp. 189-193.
12. Langolf, G. D. (1973). Human motor performance in precise microscopic work. PdD dissertation. University of Michigan. Also published by the MTM Association, Fairlawn, New Jersey, 1973.
13. Mackinlay, J. (1986a). Automatic design of graphical presentations. PhD dissertation. Computer Science Dept., Stanford University. Also Tech. Rep. Stan-CS-86-1038.
14. Mackinlayj J. (1986b) Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2, April), 110-141.
15. Mackinlay, J. D., Card, S. K., & Robertson, G. G. (in press). A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. To appear in Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Olsen, D. R., et al. (1987). ACM SIGGRAPH workshop on software tools for user interface management. Computer Graphics 21(2), 71-147.
17. Olsen, D. R., & Halversen, B. W. (1988). Interface usage measurements in a user interface management system. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software. Banff, Alberta, Canada, October, 19988, 102-108. New York: ACM
18. Pfaff, G. E. (1985). User interface management systems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K. & Mackinlay J. (1989). The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces. Proceedings of ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. Williamsburg, VA, in press. New York: ACM.
20. Sheridan, T. B. (1984). Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicles and dynamic processes: experiments in command and display aiding. Advances in Man-Machine System Research, 1, 49-137, JAI Press.
21. Siewiorek, D., Bell, G., & Newell, A. (1981). Computer structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22. Tanner, P. P. & Buxton, W. A. S. (1985). Some issues in future UIMS development. In G. E. Pfaif (ed.), User interface management systems, (pp. 67-79), New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Van Den Bos, J. (1988). Abstract iteraction tools: a language for user interface management systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 10(2), 215-247.
24. Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.
25. Whitefield, D., Ball, R., & Bird, J. (1983). Some comparisons of on-display and off-display touch input devices for interaction with computer generated displays. Ergonomics, 26(11), pp. 1033-1053.
26. Zwicky, F. (1967) The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research, and construction. In F. Zwicky & A. G. Wilson (Eds.), New methods of thought and procedure. Springer-Verlag (New York).