Substitution effects and spatial preference heterogeneity in single- and multiple-site choice experiments

Land Economics

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 302-322

  Logar, Ivana ^a   Brouwer, Roy ^a,b  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HETEROGENEITY; PLANNING METHOD; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA; WELFARE PROVISION;

EID: 85046797917     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: 15438325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/le.94.2.302     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bateman, Ian J., Brett H. Day, Stavros Georgiou, and Iain Lake. 2006. "The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP." Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450-60.
2. Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, et al. 2005. "Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts." Science 308 (5722): 636-37.
3. Bhat, Chandra R. 2001. "Quasi-random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Multinomial Logit Model." Transportation Research B 35 (7): 677-95.
4. Brouwer, Roy, and Julia Martín-Ortega. 2012. "Modeling Self-censoring of Polluter Pays Protest Votes in Stated Preference Research to Support Resource Damage Estimations in Environmental Liability." Resource and Energy Economics 34 (1): 151-66.
5. Brouwer, Roy, and Louis H. G. Slangen. 1998. "Contingent Valuation of the Public Benefits of Agricultural Wildlife Management: The Case of Dutch Peat Meadow Land." European Review of Agricultural Economics 25 (1): 53-72.
6. Brown, Thomas C., and John W. Duffield. 1995. "Testing Part-Whole Valuation Effects in Contingent Valuation of Instream Flow Protection." Water Resources Research 31 (9): 2341-51.
7. Cameron, Trudy Ann. 2006. "Directional Heterogeneity in Distance Profiles in Hedonic Property Value Methods." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 (1): 26-45.
8. Campbell, Danny, W. George Hutchinson, and Riccardo Scarpa. 2009. "Using Choice Experiments to Explore the Spatial Distribution of Willingness to Pay for Rural Landscape Improvements." Environment and Planning A 41 (1): 97-111.
9. Carson, Richard T., and Theodore Groves. 2007. "Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions." Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181-210.
10. Collins, Jill P., and Christian A. Vossler. 2009. "Incentive Compatibility Tests of Choice Experiment Value Elicitation Questions." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (2): 226-35.
11. Concu, Giovanni B. 2007. "Investigating Distance Effects on Environmental Values: A Choice Modelling Approach." Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51 (2): 175-94.
12. Cummings, Ronald G., Philip T. Ganderton, and Thomas McGuckin. 1994. "Substitution Effects in CVM Values." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (2): 205-14.
13. FOEN (Swiss Federal Office for the Environment). 2011. Restoration of Rivers and Lakes in the Water Protection Act [in German]. Available at www.bafu.admin.ch/dokumenta tion/medieninformation/00962/index.html? lang=de&msg-id=38964 (accessed October 24, 2015).
14. Greene, William H. 2002. Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Hailu, Atakelty, Wiktor L. Adamowicz, and Peter C. Boxall. 2000. "Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation." Environmental and Resource Economics 16 (1): 51-68.
16. Hanley, Nick, Felix Schläpfer, and James Spurgeon. 2003. "Aggregating the Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Distance-Decay Functions for Use and Non-use Values." Journal of Environmental Management 68 (3): 297-304.
17. Hensher, David A., John M. Rose, and William H. Greene. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hoehn, John P., and John B. Loomis. 1993. "Substitution Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1): 56-75.
19. Hynes, Stephen, Nick Hanley, and Riccardo Scarpa. 2008. "Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (4): 1011-27.
20. Johnston, Robert J., and Mahesh Ramachandran. 2014. "Modeling Spatial Patchiness and Hot Spots in Stated Preference Willingness to Pay." Environmental and Resource Economics 59 (3): 363-87.
21. Jørgensen, Sisse Liv, Søren Bøye Olsen, Jacob Ladenburg, Louise Martinsen, Stig Roar Svenningsen, and Berit Hasler. 2013. "Spatially Induced Disparities in Users' and Non-users' WTP for Water Quality Improvements: Testing the Effect of Multiple Substitutes and Distance Decay." Ecological Economics 92: 58-66.
22. Kurth, Anne-Marie, and Mario Schirmer. 2014. "Thirty Years of River Restoration in Switzerland: Implemented Measures and Lessons Learned." Environmental Earth Sciences 72 (6): 2065-79.
23. Lancaster, Kelvin J. 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory." Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132-57.
24. Lizin, S., R. Brouwer, I. Liekens, and S. Broeckx. 2016. "Accounting for Substitution and Spatial Heterogeneity in a Labelled Choice Experiment." Journal of Environmental Management 181: 289-97.
25. Loomis, John B. 2000. "Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions." Land Economics 76 (2): 312-21.
26. Louviere, Jordan J., David A. Hensher, and Joffre D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Mas-Colell, Andreu, Michael D. Whinston, and Jerry R. Green. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. McFadden, Daniel. 1974. "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior." In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Paul Zarembka, 105-42. New York: Academic Press.
29. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1993. "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation." Federal Register 58 (10): 4601-14.
30. Neill, Helen R. 1995. "The Context for Substitutes in CVM Studies: Some Empirical Observations." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (3): 393-97.
31. Paillex, Amael, Nele Schuwirth, Armin W. Lorenz, Kathrin Januschke, Armin Peter, and Peter Reichert."Integrating and Extending Ecological River Assessment: Concept and Test with Two Restoration Projects." Ecological Indicators 72: 131-41.
32. Palmer, Margaret A., Holly L. Menninger, and Emily Bernhardt. 2010. "River Restoration, Habitat Heterogeneity and Biodiversity: A Failure of Theory or Practice." Freshwater Biology 55 (1): 205-22.
33. Pate, Jennifer, and John Loomis. 1997. "The Effect of Distance on Willingness to Pay Values: A Case Study of Wetlands and Salmon in California." Ecological Economics 20 (3): 199-207.
34. Poe, Gregory L., Kelly L. Giraud, and John B. Loomis. 2005. "Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353-65.
35. Revelt, David, and Kenneth Train. 1998. "Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level." Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 647-57.
36. Rolfe, John, JeffBennett, and Jordan Louviere. 2002. "Stated Values and Reminders of Substitute Goods: Testing for Framing Effects with Choice Modelling." Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46 (1): 1-20.
37. Rolfe, John, and Jill Windle. 2012. "Distance Decay Functions for Iconic Assets: Assessing National Values to Protect the Health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia." Environmental and Resource Economics 53 (3): 347-65.
38. Rose, John M., Michiel C. J. Bliemer, David A. Hensher, and Andrew T. Collins. 2008. "Designing Efficient Stated Choice Experiments in the Presence of Reference Alternatives." Transportation Research Part B 42 (4): 395-406.
39. Schaafsma, Marije, and Roy Brouwer. 2013. "Testing Geographical Framing and Substitution Effects in Spatial Choice Experiments." Journal of Choice Modelling 8: 32-48.
40. Schaafsma, Marije, Roy Brouwer, Alison Gilbert, Jeroen van den Bergh, and Alfred Wagtendonk. 2013. Estimation of Distance-Decay Functions to Account for Substitution and Spatial Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Research." Land Economics 89 (3): 514-37.
41. Schaafsma, Marije, Roy Brouwer, and John Rose. 2012. "Directional Heterogeneity in WTP Models for Environmental Valuation." Ecological Economics 79: 21-31.
42. Swait, Joffre, and Jordan Louviere. 1993. "The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models." Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305-14.
43. Train, Kenneth E. 2003. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Varian, Hal R. 2014. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 9th ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
45. Woolsey, Sharon, Florence Capelli, Tom Gonser, Eduard Hoehn, Markus Hostmann, Berit Junker, Achim Paetzold, Christian Roulier, Steffen Schweizer, Scott D. Tiegs, et al. 2007. "A Strategy to Assess River Restoration Success." Freshwater Biology 52 (4): 752-69.
46. Woolsey, Sharon, Christine Weber, Tom Gonser, Eduard Hoehn, Markus Hostmann, Berit Junker, Christian Roulier, Steffen Schweizer, Scott D. Tiegs, Klement Tockner, and Armin Peter. 2005. Handbook for Evaluating Rehabilitation Projects in Rivers and Streams. A publication by the Rhone-Thur Project. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Laboratory of Hydraulic Constructions (LCH, EPFL Lausanne), and Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW, ETH Zurich).