Automatic recognition of personality in conversation

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Short Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 85-88

  Mairesse, François ^a   Walker, Marilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS; AUTOMATIC RECOGNITION; MATCHINGS; PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; PROSODICS; TRAIN MODEL;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85046752157     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. E. André, M. Klesen, P. Gebhard, S. Allen, and T. Rist. 1999. Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters. In Proc. of the International Workshop on Affect in Interactions, p. 136-149.
2. P. Boersma. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10):341-345.
3. M. Coltheart. 1981. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly J. of Experimental Psychology, 33A:497-505.
4. B. Donnellan, R. D. Conger, and C. M. Bryant. 2004. The Big Five and enduring marriages. J. of Research in Personality, 38:481-504.
5. Y. Freund, R. Iyer, R. E. Schapire, and Y. Singer. 1998. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. In Proc. of the 15th ICML, p. 170-178.
6. D. Funder and C. Sneed. 1993. Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3):479-490.
7. A. Furnham, 1990. Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, chapter Language and Personality. Winley.
8. A. J. Gill and J. Oberlander. 2002. Taking care of the linguistic features of extraversion. In Proc. of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, p. 363-368.
9. F. Heylighen and J.-M. Dewaele. 2002. Variation in the contextuality of language: an empirical measure. Context in Context, Special issue of Foundations of Science, 7:293-340.
10. R. Hogan, G. J. Curphy, and J. Hogan. 1994. What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49(6):493-504.
11. O. P. John and S. Srivastava. 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin and O. P. John, editors, Handbook of personality theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.
12. J. Liscombe, J. Venditti, and J. Hirschberg. 2003. Classifying subject ratings of emotional speech using acoustic features. In Proc. of Eurospeech - Interspeech 2003, p. 725-728.
13. M. R. Mehl, S. D. Gosling, and J. W. Pennebaker. In press. Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. J. of Personality and Social Psychology.
14. W. T. Norman. 1963. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality rating. J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66:574-583.
15. S. Nunn. 2005. Preventing the next terrorist attack: The theory and practice of homeland security information systems. J. of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2(3).
16. J. W. Pennebaker and L. A. King. 1999. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 77:1296-1312.
17. J. W. Pennebaker, L. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth, 2001. LIWC: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count.
18. B. Reeves and C. Nass. 1996. The Media Equation. University of Chicago Press.
19. K. R. Scherer. 1979. Personality markers in speech. In K. R. Scherer and H. Giles, editors, Social markers in speech, p. 147-209. Cambridge University Press.
20. S. Tucker and S. Whittaker. 2004. Accessing multimodal meeting data: Systems, problems and possibilities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3361:1-11.
21. M. Walker and S. Whittaker. 1990. Mixed initiative in dialogue: an investigation into discourse segmentation. In Proc. of the 28th Annual Meeting of the ACL, p. 70-78.