He said, she said: Gender in the ACL anthology

Proceedings of the ACL-2012 Special Workshop on Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries, Discoveries 2012 at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 33-41

  Vogel, Adam ^a   Jurafsky, Dan ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORMAL METHODS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

FINE GRAINED; FINITE-STATE-MODELS; FORMAL SEMANTICS; GENDER STUDIES; LATENT DIRICHLET ALLOCATION; RESEARCH TOPICS; TOPIC MODELING;

STATISTICS;

EID: 85046660516     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ashton Anderson, Dan McFarland, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. Towards a computational history of the acl: 1980-2008. In ACL 2012 Workshop: Rediscovering 50 Years of Discoveries.
2. Theresa Beaubouef and Wendy Zhang. 2011. Where are the women computer science students? J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 26(4):14-20, April.
3. S. Bird, R. Dale, B.J. Dorr, B. Gibson, M. Joseph, M.Y. Kan, D. Lee, B. Powley, D.R. Radev, and Y.F. Tan. 2008. The ACL Anthology Reference Corpus: A reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics. In LREC-08, pages 1755-1759.
4. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993-1022, March.
5. US Census. 2012. First name frequency by gender. http://www.census.gov/genealogy/names/names files.html.
6. CRA. 2008. CRA Taulbee Survey (web site). http://www.cra.org/resources/taulbee/.
7. David L.W. Hall, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. Studying the history of ideas using topic models. In Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing.
8. Catherine Hill, Christianne Corbett, and Andresse St Rose. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. American Association of University Women.
9. Paul De Palma. 2001. Viewpoint: Why women avoid computer science. Commun. ACM, 44:27-30, June.
10. Dragomir R. Radev, Pradeep Muthukrishnan, and Vahed Qazvinian. 2009. The ACL Anthology Network corpus. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, NLPIR4DL '09, pages 54-61, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Andrew Sih and Kiisa Nishikawa. 1988. Do men and women really differ in publication rates and contentiousness? an empirical survey. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 69(1):pp. 15-18.
12. Kusum Singh, Katherine R Allen, Rebecca Scheckler, and Lisa Darlington. 2007. Women in computerrelated majors: A critical synthesis of research and theory from 1994 to 2005. Review of Educational Research, 77(4):500-533.
13. Ellen Spertus. 1991. Why are there so few female computer scientists? Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
14. Matthew R.E. Symonds, Neil J. Gemmell, Tamsin L. Braisher, Kylie L. Gorringe, and Mark A. Elgar. 2006. Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. PLoS ONE, 1(1):e127, 12.