Physical activity and sedentary behavior during pregnancy and postpartum, measured using hip and wrist-worn accelerometers

Preventive Medicine Reports

Volumn 10, Issue , 2018, Pages 337-345

  Hesketh, Kathryn R ^a,b,e   Evenson, Kelly R ^c   Stroo, Marissa ^d   Clancy, Shayna M ^d   Østbye, Truls ^d   Benjamin Neelon, Sara E ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c IL   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Measurement; Physical activity; Postpartum; Pregnancy; Sedentary behavior

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; HOUSEHOLD INCOME; HUMAN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

EID: 85046462399     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22113355     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adamo, K.B., S a, Prince, Tricco, A.C., Connor-Gorber, S., Tremblay, M., A comparison of indirect versus direct measures for assessing physical activity in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. 4 (2009), 2–27.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Committee opinion no. 650. Obstet. Gynecol. 126 (2015), e135–42.
3. Barnett, A., Cerin, E., Vandelanotte, C., Matsumoto, A., Jenkins, D., Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 7 (2015), 1–11.
4. Borodulin, K., Evenson, K.R., Wen, F., Herring, A.H., Benson, A., Physical activity patterns during pregnancy. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40 (2008), 1901–1908.
5. Borodulin, K., Evenson, K.R., Herring, A.H., Physical activity patterns during pregnancy through postpartum. BMC Womens Health, 9, 2009, 32.
6. Choi, L., Liu, Z., Matthews, C.E., Buchowski, M.S., Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43 (2011), 357–364.
7. Conway, M.R., Marshall, M.R., Schlaff, R.A., Pfeiffer, K.A., Pivarnik, J.M., Physical activity device reliability and validity during pregnancy and postpartum. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 50 (2018), 617–623.
8. Currie, S., Sinclair, M., Liddle, D.S., Nevill, A., Murphy, M.H., Application of objective physical activity measurement in an antenatal physical activity consultation intervention: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 15, 2015, 1259.
9. da Silva, S.G., Ricardo, L.I., Evenson, K.R., Hallal, P.C., Leisure-time physical activity in pregnancy and maternal-child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Sports Med., 2016, 10.1007/s40279-016-0565-2.
10. Department of Health, Start Active, Stay Active: A Report on Physical Activity From the Four Home Countries' Chief Medical Officers. London, UK. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_128210.pdf, 2011.
11. Department of Health and Human Services, Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. (Washington, DC), 2008.
12. Evenson, K., Terry, J.W., Assessment of differing definitions of accelerometer nonwear time. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 80 (2009), 355–362.
13. Evenson, K.R., Wen, F., National trends in self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors among pregnant women: NHANES 1999–2006. Prev. Med. (Baltim) 50 (2010), 123–128.
14. Evenson, K.R., Wen, F., Prevalence and correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior among US pregnant women. Prev. Med. (Baltim) 53 (2011), 39–43.
15. Evenson, K.R., Chasan-Taber, L., Symons Downs, D., Pearce, E., Review of self-reported physical activity assessment for pregnancy: summary of the evidence for validity and reliability. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 26 (2012), 479–494.
16. Evenson, K.R., Herring, A.H., Wen, F., Self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among a cohort of postpartum women: the PIN postpartum study. J. Phys. Act. Health 9 (2012), 5–20.
17. Fairclough, S.J., Noonan, R., Rowlands, A.V., van Hees, V., Knowles, Z., Boddy, L.M., Wear compliance and activity in children wearing wrist and hip-mounted accelerometers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 3 (2015), 245–253.
18. Freedson, P.S., Melanson, E., Sirard, J., Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 30 (1998), 777–781.
19. Guérin, E., Ferraro, Z.M., Adamo, K.B., Prud'homme, D., The need to objectively measure physical activity during pregnancy: considerations for clinical research and public health impact. Matern. Child Health J., 0, 2018, 0.
20. Harrison, C.L., Thompson, R.G., Teede, H.J., Lombard, C.B., Measuring physical activity during pregnancy. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., 8, 2011, 19.
21. Hesketh, K.R., Evenson, K.R., Prevalence of U.S. pregnant women meeting 2015 ACOG physical activity guidelines. Am. J. Prev. Med. 51 (2016), e87–9.
22. Hildebrand, M., Van Hees, V.T., Hansen, B.H., Ekelund, U., Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist-and hip-worn monitors. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46 (2014), 1816–1824.
23. John, D., Miller, R., Kozey-Keadle, S., Caldwell, G., Freedson, P., Biomechanical examination of the ‘plateau phenomenon’ in ActiGraph vertical activity counts. Physiol. Meas. 33 (2012), 219–230.
24. Kamada, M., Shiroma, E.J., Harris, T.B., Lee, I.M., Comparison of physical activity assessed using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers. Gait Posture 44 (2016), 23–28.
25. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977), 159–174.
26. Mannini, A., Intille, S., Rosenberger, M., Sabatini, A., Haskell, W., Activity recognition using a single accelerometer places at the wrist or ankle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 45 (2013), 2193–2203.
27. Matthews, C.E., Chen, K.Y., Freedson, P.S. et al., Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167 (2008), 875–881.
28. McClain, J.J., Sisson, S.B., Tudor-Locke, C., Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 39 (2007), 1509–1514.
29. McParlin, C., Robson, S.C., Tennant, P.W.G. et al., Objectively measured physical activity during pregnancy: a study in obese and overweight women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10, 2010, 76.
30. Melzer, K., Schutz, Y., Boulvain, M., Kayser, B., Pregnancy-related changes in activity energy expenditure and resting metabolic rate in Switzerland. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 63 (2009), 1185–1191.
31. Neelon, S.E.B., Østbye, T., Bennett, G.G. et al., Cohort Profile for the Nurture Observational Study Examining Associations of Multiple Caregivers on Infant Growth in the Southeastern USA. 2017, 1–10.
32. Ozemek, C., Kirschner, M.M., Wilkerson, B.S., Byun, W., Kaminsky, L.A., Intermonitor reliability of the GT3X+ accelerometer at hip, wrist and ankle sites during activities of daily living. Physiol. Meas. 35 (2014), 129–138.
33. Pereira, M.A., Rifas-shiman, S.L., Kleinman, K.P. et al., Predictors of change in physical activity during and after pregnancy: project viva. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32 (2007), 612–624.
34. Richardsen, K.R., Mdala, I., Berntsen, S. et al., Objectively recorded physical activity in pregnancy and postpartum in a multi-ethnic cohort: association with access to recreational areas in the neighbourhood. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act., 13, 2016, 78.
35. Rousham, E.K., Clarke, P.E., Gross, H., Significant changes in physical activity among pregnant women in the UK as assessed by accelerometry and self-reported activity. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 60 (2006), 393–400.
36. Sasaki, J.E., John, D., Freedson, P.S., Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J. Sci. Med. Sport 14 (2011), 411–416.
37. StataCorp, L.P., STATA 14/SE. 2014.
38. Swartz, A.N.N.M., Strath, S.J., Bassett, D.R., O'Brien, W.L., King, G.A., Ainsworth, B.E., Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32 (2000), S450–456.
39. Troiano, R.P., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K.W. et al., Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40 (2008), 181–188.
40. Troiano, R.P., McClain, J.J., Brychta, R.J., Chen, K., Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research. Bristish J. Sport Med. 48 (2014), 1019–1023.
41. Tudor-Locke, C., Barreira, T.V., Schuna, J.M., Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47 (2015), 839–842.
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. (Washington, DC), 2008.
43. van Hees, V.T., Renström, F., Wright, A. et al., Estimation of daily energy expenditure in pregnant and non-pregnant women using a wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometer. PLoS One, 6, 2011, 10.1371/journal.pone.0022922.
44. Vanhelst, J., Zunquin, G., Theunynck, D., Mikulovic, J., Bui-Xuan, G., Béghin, L., Equivalence of accelerometer data for walking and running: treadmill versus on land. J. Sports Sci. 27 (2009), 669–675.
45. World Health Organisation, Obesity and overweight. WHO Fact Sheet N°311, 2013 http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.