The effect of a web-based coding tool with automatic feedback on students' performance and perceptions

SIGCSE 2018 - Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn 2018-January, Issue , 2018, Pages 2-7

  Benotti, Luciana ^a   Aloi, Federico ^b   Bulgarelli, Franco ^c   Gomez, Marcos J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE QUILMES   (Argentina)

^c Mumuki Project   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Automatic assessment; Coding tools; Functional programming; Haskell; Replication

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; STUDENTS; WEBSITES;

AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT; CODING TOOLS; FORMATIVE FEEDBACKS; HASKELL; REPLICATION; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS' PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 85046090891     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3159450.3159579     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Valerie Barr and Deborah Trytten. 2016. Using Turing's craft CodeLab to support CS1 students as they learn to program. Association for Computing Machinery Inroads 7, 2 (2016), 67-75.
2. Peter Brusilovsky, Stephen Edwards, Amruth Kumar, Lauri Malmi, Luciana Benotti, Duane Buck, Petri Ihantola, Rikki Prince, Teemu Sirkiä, Sergey Sosnovsky, et al. 2014. Increasing Adoption of Smart Learning Content for Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR). ACM, 31-57.
3. M. Y. Chuttur. 2009. Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments and Future Directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 9, 37 (2009).
4. Koen Claessen and John Hughes. 2000. QuickCheck: A Lightweight Tool for Random Testing of Haskell Programs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP). 268-279.
5. Alex Daniel Edgcomb, Frank Vahid, Roman Lysecky, Andre Knoesen, Rajeevan Amirtharajah, and Mary Lou Dorf. 2015. Student performance improvement using interactive textbooks: A three-university cross-semester analysis. American Society for Engineering Education.
6. Alex Gerdes, Bastiaan Heeren, Johan Jeuring, and L Thomas van Binsbergen. 2016. Ask-Elle: an adaptable programming tutor for Haskell giving automated feedback. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2016), 1-36.
7. Alex Gerdes, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2012. An interactive functional programming tutor. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). 250-255.
8. Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, Alireza Ahadi, Matthew Butler, Jürgen Börstler, Stephen H. Edwards, Essi Isohanni, et al. 2015. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming. In Proceedings of Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference (ITiCSE-WGR). ACM, 41-63.
9. Hieke Keuning, Johan Jeuring, and Bastiaan Heeren. 2016. Towards a Systematic Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). ACM, 41-46.
10. Amruth N. Kumar. 2008. The Effect of Using Problem-solving Software Tutors on the Self-confidence of Female Students. Special Interest Group in Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) Bulletin 40, 1 (March 2008), 523-527.
11. Amruth N. Kumar. 2015. The Effectiveness of Visualization for Learning Expression Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 362-367.
12. Richard Lobb and Jenny Harlow. 2016. Coderunner: A Tool for Assessing Computer Programming Skills. ACM Inroads 7, 1 (Feb. 2016), 47-51.
13. Nick Parlante. 2017. CodingBat. http://codingbat.com. (2017). [Online; accessed 17-August-2017].
14. Jaime Spacco, Paul Denny, Brad Richards, David Babcock, David Hovemeyer, James Moscola, and Robert Duvall. 2015. Analyzing StudentWork Patterns Using Programming Exercise Data. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18-23.
15. Christopher Watson and Frederick W.B. Li. 2014. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming Revisited. In Proceedings of the Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE). 39-44.