Anatomy of an online misinformation network

PLoS ONE

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2018, Pages

  Shao, Chengcheng ^a,b   Hui, Pik Mai ^b   Wang, Lei ^b   Jiang, Xinwen ^c   Flammini, Alessandro ^b   Menczer, Filippo ^b   Ciampaglia, Giovanni Luca ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c XIANGTAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; DECOMPOSITION; DIFFUSION; ELECTION; HUMAN; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNITED STATES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; POLITICS; SOCIAL MEDIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85046071518     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196087     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Barthel M, Mitchell A, Holcomb J. Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion; 2016. Available from: http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowingconfusion/.
2. Gottfried J, Shearer E. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017; 2017. Available from: http://www.journalism.org/2017/09/07/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017/.
3. Barthel M, Mitchell A. Americans’ Attitudes About the News Media Deeply Divided Along Partisan Lines; 2017. Available from: http://www.journalism.org/2017/05/10/americans-attitudes-about-thenews-media-deeply-divided-along-partisan-lines/.
4. Ratkiewicz J, Conover M, Meiss M, Gonçalves B, Patil S, Flammini A, et al. Truthy: Mapping the Spread of Astroturf in Microblog Streams. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. WWW’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2011. p. 249–252. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1963192.1963301.
5. Xiang W, Zhilin Z, Xiang Y, Yan J, Bin Z, Shasha L. Finding the hidden hands: a case study of detecting organized posters and promoters in SINA weibo. China Communications. 2015; 12(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2015.7366237
6. Ratkiewicz J, Conover M, Meiss M, Goncalves B, Flammini A, Menczer F. Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media. In: Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI; 2011. p. 297–304. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2850.
7. Sampson J, Morstatter F, Wu L, Liu H. Leveraging the Implicit Structure Within Social Media for Emergent Rumor Detection. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. CIKM’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2016. p. 2377–2382. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2983323.2983697.
8. Wu L, Morstatter F, Hu X, Liu H. Mining Misinformation in Social Media. In: Thai MT, Wu W, Xiong H, editors. Big Data in Complex and Social Networks. Business & Economics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2016. p. 125–152.
9. Declerck T, Osenova P, Georgiev G, Lendvai P. Ontological Modelling of Rumors. In: TrandabăT¸ D, Gîfu D, editors. Linguistic Linked Open Data: 12th EUROLAN 2015 Summer School and RUMOUR 2015 Workshop, Sibiu, Romania, July 13-25, 2015, Revised Selected Papers. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 3–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-32942-0_1.
10. Kumar S, West R, Leskovec J. Disinformation on the Web: Impact, Characteristics, and Detection of Wikipedia Hoaxes. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW’16. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee; 2016. p. 591–602. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883085.
11. Varol O, Ferrara E, Menczer F, Flammini A. Early detection of promoted campaigns on social media. EPJ Data Science. 2017; 6(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0111-y
12. Varol O, Ferrara E, Davis CA, Menczer F, Flammini A. Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization. In: Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI; 2017. p. 280–289. Available from: https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15587.
13. Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun ACM. 2016; 59 (7):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717
14. Ferrara E. Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday. 2017; 22(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005
15. Shao C, Ciampaglia GL, Varol O, Flammini A, Menczer F. The spread of misinformation by social bots. CoRR; 2017. arXiv:1707.07592.
16. Ecker UKH, Hogan JL, Lewandowsky S. Reminders and Repetition of Misinformation: Helping or Hindering Its Retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2017; 6(2):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
17. Nyhan B, Reifler J. Estimating Fact-checking’s Effects; 2016. Available from: https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Estimating-Fact-Checkings-Effect.pdf.
18. Jun Y, Meng R, Johar GV. Perceived social presence reduces fact-checking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114(23):5976–5981. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700175114
19. Nematzadeh A, Ciampaglia GL, Menczer F, Flammini A. How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality. CoRR; 2017. arXiv:1707.00574.
20. Qiu X, F M Oliveira D, Sahami Shirazi A, Flammini A, Menczer F. Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nature Human Behavior. 2017; 1:0132–. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41562-017-0132
21. Wardle C. Fake news. It’s complicated. First Draft News; 2017. Available from: https://firstdraftnews.com/fake-news-complicated/.
22. Mitra T, Gilbert E. CREDBANK: A Large-Scale Social Media Corpus With Associated Credibility Annotations. In: Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI; 2015. p. 258–267. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10582.
23. Hassan N, Li C, Tremayne M. Detecting Check-worthy Factual Claims in Presidential Debates. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. CIKM’15. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2015. p. 1835–1838. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2806416.2806652.
24. Metaxas PT, Finn S, Mustafaraj E. Using TwitterTrails.com to Investigate Rumor Propagation. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. CSCW’15 Companion. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2015. p. 69–72. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2685553.2702691.
25. Carton S, Park S, Zeffer N, Adar E, Mei Q, Resnick P. Audience Analysis for Competing Memes in Social Media. In: Proc. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI; 2015. p. 41–50. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10592.
26. Silverman C. Emergent; 2015. Available from: http://www.emergent.info/.
27. Ciampaglia GL, Mantzarlis A, Maus G, Menczer F. Research Challenges of Digital Misinformation: Toward a Trustworthy Web. AI Magazine. 2018;in press.
28. Lazer D, Baum M, Grinberg N, Friedland L, Joseph K, Hobbs W, et al. Combating Fake News: An Agenda for Research and Action; 2017. Available from: https://shorensteincenter.org/combating-fakenews-agenda-for-research/.
29. Lu X, Brelsford C. Network Structure and Community Evolution on Twitter: Human Behavior Change in Response to the 2011 Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami. Scientific Reports. 2014; 4:6773. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06773 PMID: 25346468
30. Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, et al. The spreading of misinformation online. Proc National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113(3):554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1517441113
31. Schmidt AL, Zollo F, Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Scala A, Caldarelli G, et al. Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114(12):3035–3039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617052114
32. Starbird K. Examining the Alternative Media Ecosystem Through the Production of Alternative Narratives of Mass Shooting Events on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM); 2017. p. 230–239. Available from: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15603.
33. Silverman C. Viral Fake Election News Outperformed Real News On Facebook In Final Months Of The US Election; 2016. Available from: https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-newsoutperformed-real-news-on-facebook.
34. Weedon J, Nuland W, Stamos A. Information Operations and Facebook; 2017. Available from: https://fbnewsroomus.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/facebook-and-information-operations-v1.pdf.
35. Mosseri A. News Feed FYI: Showing More Informative Links in News Feed; 2017. Available from: https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2017/06/news-feed-fyi-showing-more-informative-links-in-news-feed/.
36. Crowell C. Our Approach to Bots & Misinformation; 2017. Available from: https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/company/2017/Our-Approach-Bots-Misinformation.html.
37. Shao C, Ciampaglia GL, Flammini A, Menczer F. Hoaxy: A Platform for Tracking Online Misinformation. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. WWW’16 Companion. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee; 2016. p. 745–750. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890098.
38. Brandtzaeg PB, Følstad A. Trust and Distrust in Online Fact-checking Services. Commun ACM. 2017; 60(9):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122803
39. Gomes B. Our latest quality improvements for Search; 2017. Available from: https://blog.google/products/search/our-latest-quality-improvements-search/.
40. Dorogovtsev SN, Goltsev AV, Mendes JFF. k-Core Organization of Complex Networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2006; 96:040601 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.040601 PMID: 16486798
41. Alvarez-Hamelin JI, Dall’Asta L, Barrat A, Vespignani A. K-core decomposition of Internet graphs: hierarchies, self-similarity and measurement biases. Networks and Heterogeneous Media. 2008; 3(2):371–393. https://doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2008.3.371
42. Kitsak M, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley HE, et al. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics. 2010; 6:888–. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1746
43. Conover MD, Gonçalves B, Flammini A, Menczer F. Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science. 2012; 1(1):6 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds6
44. Eidsaa M, Almaas E. s-core network decomposition: A generalization of k-core analysis to weighted networks. Phys Rev E. 2013; 88:062819. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.062819
45. Davis CA, Varol O, Ferrara E, Flammini A, Menczer F. BotOrNot: A System to Evaluate Social Bots. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. WWW’16 Companion. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee; 2016. p. 273–274. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889302.
46. Davis CA. Botometer API; 2017. Available from: https://botometer.iuni.iu.edu/#!/api.
47. Shao C, Menczer F, Ciampaglia GL. Hoaxy FAQ; 2017. Available from: http://hoaxy.iuni.iu.edu/faq.html.
48. Twitter. Filter realtime Tweets; 2017. Available from: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tweets/filterrealtime/overview/statuses-filter.
49. Apache Software Foundation. Apache Lucene; 2005. Available from: http://lucene.apache.org/.
50. Broder AZ, Glassman SC, Manasse MS, Zweig G. Syntactic clustering of the Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 1997; 29(8):1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(97)00031-7
51. Gupta S, Kaiser G, Neistadt D, Grimm P. DOM-based Content Extraction of HTML Documents. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW’03. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2003. p. 207–214. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775152.775182.
52. LLC PL. Mercury Web Parser by Postlight; 2017. Available from: https://mercury.postlight.com/webparser/.
53. Lehmann J, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ, Cattuto C. Dynamical Classes of Collective Attention in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2012. p. 251–260. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2187836.2187871.
54. Shao C, Menczer F, Ciampaglia GL. Hoaxy API Documentation; 2017. Available from: https://market.mashape.com/truthy/hoaxy.
55. Bessi A, Ferrara E. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday. 2016; 21(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090
56. Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab; 1999.
57. Freeman LC. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry. 1977; 40(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
58. Callaway DS, Newman MEJ, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ. Network Robustness and Fragility: Percolation on Random Graphs. Phys Rev Lett. 2000; 85:5468–5471. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468PMID: 11136023
59. Silverman C. Lies, Damn Lies and Viral Content: How News Websites Spread (and Debunk) Online Rumors, Unverified Claims and Misinformation. Tow Center for Digital Journalism; 2015. Available from: https://towcenter.org/research/lies-damn-lies-and-viral-content/.
60. Shao C, Menczer F, Ciampaglia GL. Hoaxy Backend; 2017. Available from: https://github.com/IUNetSci/hoaxy-backend.
61. Shao C, Wang L, Serrette B, Pentchev V, Menczer F, Ciampaglia GL. Hoaxy Frontend; 2017. Available from: https://github.com/IUNetSci/hoaxy-frontend.