Concordance theory: The cases of India and Pakistan

Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 27-44

  Schiff, Rebecca L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045598544     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429501579     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Rebecca L. Schiff, “Civil-Military Relations Reconsidered: Israel as an ‘Uncivil’ State:’ Security Studies 1, no. 4 (Summer 1992);
2. Rebecca L. Schiff, “Civil-Military Relations Reconsidered: A Theory of Concordance,” Armed Forces and Society 1 (Fall 1995):7-24.
3. Samuel Finer, The Man on Horseback (Boulder: Westview Press, 1988), 78-79.
4. Morris Janowitz and Samuel Huntington; Lucian Pye, “Armies in the Process of Political Modernization,” in J. J. Johnson, ed., The Role of the Military in Underdeveloped Countries (New Haven: Princeton University Press, 1968), 69;
5. Guy Pauker, “Southeast Asia as a Problem Area in the Next Decade,” World Politics 11 (1959);
6. Morris Janowitz, The Military in the Political Development of New Nations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964);
7. Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), 222.
8. Samuel Huntington, The Soldier and the State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957), 72-93, 83-85.
9. Louis Smith, American Democracy and Military Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951), 11, 32.
10. Myron Weiner, “Political Culture in Foreign Area Studies,” in Richard J. Samuels and Myron Weiner, eds., The Political Culture of Foreign Area and International Studies (Washington, D.C.: Brasseys, 1992), 4.
11. Stephen P. Cohen, The Indian Army (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), 50, 51, 62.
12. Pradeep P. Barua, “Ethnic Conflict in the Military of Developing Nations: A Comparative Analysis of India and Nigeria,” Armed Forces and Society 19 (Summer 1992):131-132.
13. Cohen, TheindianArmy, 188-189.
14. Sumit Ganguly, “From the Defense of Nation to Aid to the Civil: The Army in Contemporary India,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 26, nos. 1-2 (1991):22;
15. Atul Kohli, “State-Society Relations in India’s Changing Democracy,” in Atul Kohli, ed., India’s Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), 306.
16. Richard Knotel, Herbert Knotel, and Herbert Sieg, Uniforms of the World (New York: Exeter Books, 1980), 276-277.
17. Stephen P. Cohen, The Pakistan Army (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 53.
18. Edward Feit, The Armed Bureaucrats (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973).
19. Feit, The Armed Bureaucrats, 64
20. Cohen, The Pakistan Army, 120.
21. Brig. Gen. John Jacob, Tracts on the Native Army of India: Its Organization and Discipline (London: Smith Elder, 1858), 106;
22. Cohen, The Indian Army, 34.
23. Shelton U. Kodikara, “Bangladesh;" in Shelton U. Kodikara, ed., External Compulsions of South Asian Politics (New Delhi: Sage 1993), 127.
24. Cohen, The Pakistan Army, 43.
25. David Omissi, “Martial Races: Ethnicity and Security in Colonial India, 1858-1939,” War and Society 9, no. 1 (May 1991):7.
26. Barua, “Ethnic Conflict in the Military of Developing Nations,” 131-132.
27. Cohen, The Pakistan Army, 43.
28. Brahma Chellaney, “Regional Proliferation: Issues and Challenges,” in Nuclear Proliferation in South Asia (Boulder: Westview, 1991), 308.
29. Miriam Jordan, “Indian Opposition Party Would Assert Nuclear Capability If It Gains Power,” Wall Street Journal, April 2, 1996, A10.