Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis1

Corpora

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-37

  Biber, Douglas ^a   Davies, Mark ^a   Jones, James K ^a   Tracy Ventura, Nicole ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045158068     PISSN: 17495032     EISSN: 17551676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3366/cor.2006.1.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alcalde, L. and R. Esperanza. 1999. Las intervenciones parlamentarias: lengua oral o lengua escrita? , Anuario de Estudios Filol gicos 22, pp. 9-36.
2. Arce Castillo, A. 1999. Intensificadores en espa ol coloquial , Anuario de Estudios Filol gicos 22, pp. 37-48.
3. Ballester, A. and C. Santamaria. 1993. Transcription conventions used for the corpus of spoken contemporary Spanish , Literary and Linguistic Computing 8, pp. 283-92.
4. Besnier, N. 1988. The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers , Language 64, pp. 707-36.
5. Biber, D. 1985. Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi-feature / multi-dimensional analyses , Linguistics 23, pp. 337-60.
6. Biber, D. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings , Language 62, pp. 384-414.
7. Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Biber, D. 1992. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional Analysis , Discourse Processes 15, pp. 133-63
9. Biber, D. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Biber, D., Conrad, S. and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Biber, D. and M. Hared. 1992. Dimensions of register variation in Somali , Language Variation and Change 4, pp. 41-75.
12. Biber, D. and M. Hared. 1992. Literacy in Somali: Linguistic consequences , Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 12, pp. 260-82.
13. Biber, D., and M. Hared. 1994. Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers in D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds.) Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, pp. 182-216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and E. Finegan. 1999. The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
15. Bosque, I. and V. Demonte (eds.). 1999. Gram tica descriptiva de la lengua espa ola (3 volumes). Madrid: Real Academia Espa ola
16. Brizuela, M., Andersen, E. and L. Stallings. 1999. Discourse markers as indicators of register , Hispania 82, pp. 128-41.
17. Butler, C.S. 1992. A corpus-based approach to relative clauses in the spoken Spanish of Madrid , Hispanic Linguistics 5, pp. 1-42.
18. Butler, C.S. 1998. Collocational frameworks in Spanish , International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3, pp. 1-32.
19. Butt, J. and C. Benjamin. 2000 (third edition). A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. Chicago: NTC Publishing Group.
20. Collins, P. 1991. Cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions in English. London: Routledge.
21. Conrad, S. and D. Biber (eds). 2001. Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional studies. London: Longman.
22. Davies, M. 1995. Analyzing syntactic variation with computer-based corpora: The case of modern Spanish clitic climbing , Hispania 78, pp. 370-80.
23. Davies, M. 1997. A corpus-based analysis of Spanish subject raising in modern Spanish , Hispanic Linguistics 9, pp. 33-63.
24. Davies, M. 2002. Un corpus anotado de 100.000.000 palabras del espa ol hist rico y moderno. SEPLN 2002 (Sociedad Espa ola para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural), 21-27.
25. Davies, M. 2003. Diachronic shifts and register variation with the Lexical subject of infinitive construction. (Para yo hacerlo) in S. Montrul and F. Ord ez (eds.) Linguistic Theory and Language Development in Hispanic Languages, pp. 13-29. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
26. De Mello, G. 1992a. Le for les in the spoken educated Spanish of eleven cities , Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, pp. 407-30.
27. De Mello, G. 1992b. Se los for se lo in the spoken cultured Spanish of eleven cities , Hispanic Journal 13, pp. 165-79.
28. De Mello, G. 1995. El deque smo en el espa ol hablado contempor neo: Un caso de independencia sem ntica? , Hispanic Linguistics 6-7, pp. 117-52.
29. De Mello, G. 2002. Leismo in contemporary Spanish American educated speech , Linguistics 40, pp. 261-83.
30. De Mello, G. 2004. Clitic doubling of postverbal direct objects: Lo tengo el anillo , Hispania 87, pp. 336-49.
31. Ferguson, C.A. 1983. Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation , Language in Society 12, pp. 153-72.
32. Gibbons, J. 1999. Register aspects of literacy in Spanish , Written Language and Literacy 2, pp. 63-88.
33. Hymes, D. 1984. Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation , International Journal of the Sociology of Language 45, pp. 39-45.
34. Jang, Shyue-Chian. 1998. Dimensions of spoken and written Taiwanese: A corpus-based register study. PhD dissertation. University of Hawaii.
35. Kaltenb ck, G. 2005. It-extraposition in English: A functional view , International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10, pp. 119-60.
36. Kim, Y. 1990. Register variation in Korean: A corpus-based study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
37. Kim, Y-J. and D. Biber. 1994. A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean in D. Biber and E. Finegan (eds.) Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, pp. 157-81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Lope Blanch, J.M. (ed.). 1977. Estudios sobre el espa ol hablado en las principales ciudades de Am rica. M xico City: Universidad Nacional Aut noma.
39. Lope Blanch, J.M. 1991. Estudios sobre el espa ol de M xico. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Aut noma de M xico.
40. Marcos-Mar n, F. 1994. Inform tica y Humanidades. Madrid: Gredos.
41. Ocampo, F. 1995. Pragmatic factors in word order: Constructions with a verb and an adverb in spoken Spanish , Probus 7, pp. 69-88.
42. Oh, S.-Y. 2000. Actually and in fact in American English: A data-based analysis , English Language and Linguistics 4, pp. 243-68.
43. Parodi, G. 2005. Ling stica de corpus y an lisis multidimensional: Exploraci n de la variaci n en el Corpus PUCV-2003 in G. Parodi (ed.) Discurso Especializado e Instituciones Formadoras, pp. 83-126. Valpara so, Chile: Ediciones Universitarias de Valpara so.
44. Prince, E.F. 1978. A Comparison of Wh-clefts and It-clefts in Discourse , Language 54, pp. 883-906.
45. S iz, M. 1999. A cross-linguistic corpus-based analysis of linguistic variation. Manchester: UMIST PhD Dissertation.
46. Sedano, M. 1994a. Evaluation of two hypotheses about the alternation between aqu and ac in a corpus of present-day Spanish , Language Variation and Change 6, pp. 223-37.
47. Sedano, M. 1994b. Presencia o ausencia de relativo: explicaciones funcionales , Thesaurus 49, pp. 491-518.
48. Sigley, R. 1997. The influence of formality and channel on relative pronoun choice in New Zealand English , English Language and Linguistics 1, pp. 207-32.
49. Thibault, A. 1987. Le Preterito et l antepresente en espagnol dans la langue journalistique , Langues et Linguistique 13, pp. 287-320.
50. Tottie, G. 1991. Negation in English Speech and Writing: A Study in Variation. San Diego: Academic Press.
51. Ure, J. 1982. Introduction: Approaches to the study of register range , International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35, pp. 5-23.