The representative quality of EU treaty reform: A comparison between the IGC and the convention

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 201-226

  Pollak, Johannes ^a   Slominski, Peter ^b  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b C/O Syncrotrone Trieste   (Italy)

Author keywords

Convention on the future of europe; Democracy; Intergovernmental conference; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045157897     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0703633042000261616     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Bellamy R, Castiglione D, (2000) The uses of Democracy: Reflections on the European Democratic Deficit In: Erik O. Eriksen and John E. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation (London/New York: Routledge) pp. 65-84
2. Benhabib S, (1996) Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy in: Sheila Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (Princeton: Princeton University Press) pp. 67-94
3. Beyers J, Trondal J, (2003) How Nation‐States ‘Hit’ Europe: Ambiguity and Representation in the European Union European Integration online Papers (EioP), Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-005a.htm (accessed 23 June 2003)
4. Bingham Powell Jr. G, (2001) Democratic Representation: Two Contributions from Comparative Politics Prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California, 30 August, 2 September, 2001
5. Brown T, (2003) National Parliaments in the Convention on the Future of Europe The Federal Trust Online Paper 31
6. Butler J, (1999) Gender Trouble (New York: Routledge)
7. Christiansen T, Jørgensen KE, (1999) The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Treaty Reform European Integration online Papers (EioP) 3(1). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-001a.htm (accessed 23 June 2003)
8. Christiansen, T, Jørgensen, KE, and Wiener, A. (1999). The Social Construction of Europe. Journal Of European Public Policy, 6(4): pp. 528-544
9. Christiansen, T, Falkner, G, and Jørgensen, KE. (2002). Theorizing EU Treaty Reform: Beyond Diplomacy and Bargaining. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1): pp. 12-53
10. Closa C, (2003) Improving EU Constitutional Politics? A Preliminary Assessment of the Convention Constitutionalism Web‐Papers ConWEB No. 1. Available at: http://les1.man.ac.uk/conweb (accessed 23 June 2003)
11. Cohen J, (1997) Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy In: Jamse Bohman & William Rehg (eds) Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp. 67-91
12. CONV 392/02 Contribution from the PES members of the Convention: “Priorities for Europe” http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/02/cv00/00392en2.pdf (accessed 10 August 2004)
13. CONV 761/03 Contribution présentée par M. Elmar Brok, membre de la Convention: “Elements essentiels aux yeux du PPE concernant la gouvernance économique” http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/fr/03/cv00/00761fr03.pdf (accessed 1 August 2004)
14. Closa C, (2003) Improving EU Constitutional Politics? A Preliminary Assessment of the Convention Constitutionalism Web‐Papers ConWEB No. 1. Available at: http://les1.man.ac.uk/conweb (accessed 23 June 2003)
15. Coultrap, J. (1999). From Parliamentarism to Pluralism. Models of Democracy and the European Union's ‘Democratic Deficit’. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(1): pp. 107-135
16. Craig P, (1999) The Nature of the Community: Integration, Democracy, and Legitimacy in: Paul Craig & Gráinne de Burca (eds) The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 1-54
17. Crum, B. (2004). Politics and Power in the European Convention. Politics, 24(1): pp. 1-11
18. Dahl RA, (2000) On Democracy (New Haven/London: Yale University Press)
19. Damgaard E, (2000) Representation, Delegation and Parliamentary Control Paper prepared for the workshop on “Parliamentary control of the executive”, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Copenhagen
20. Deloche‐Gaudez F, (2001) The Convention on a Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Method for the Future? Notre Europe Research and Policy Paper 15
21. De Witte B, (2003) Entry into Force and Revision in: Bruno De Witte (ed.) Ten Reflections on the Constitutional Treaty for Europe (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy). Available at: http://europa.eu.int/futurum/documents/other/oth020403_en.pdf (accessed 16 September 2003)
22. Elster J, (1998) Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
23. Eriksen EO, (2000) Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU in: Erik O. Eriksen & John E. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union. Integration through Deliberation London/New York, Routledge pp. 42-64
24. Eriksen EO, Fossum JE, (2000) Post‐National Integration in: Erik O. Eriksen & John E. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union. Integration through Deliberation (London/New York: Routledge) pp. 1-28
25. Eulau H, (1978) Changing Views of Representation In: Heinz Eulau & John C. Wahlke (eds) The Politics of Representation (London: Sage) pp. 31-52
26. European Commisson (2000) Communication on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union COM(2000) 644 final
27. European Council (2001) Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union Available at: http://www.euconvention.be/static/LaekenDeclaration.asp (accessed 18 June 2003)
28. Fairlie JA, (1968) Das Wesen politischer Repräsentation in: Heinz Rausch (ed.) Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) pp. 28-74
29. Falkner, G. (2002). Introduction: EU Treaty Reform as a Three‐level Process. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1): pp. 1-11
30. Falkner, G. (2002a). How Intergovernmental Are Intergovernmental Conferences? An Example from the Maastricht Treaty Reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(1): pp. 98-119
31. Flash Eurobarometer 142 (2003) Convention on the Future of Europe July
32. Føllesdal A, (2002) Drafting a European Constitution — Challenges and Opportunities Constitutionalism Web‐Papers ConWEB No. 4. Available at: http://les1.man.ac.uk/conweb (accessed 22 June 2003)
33. Fraenkel E, (1968) Die repräsentative und die plebiszitäre Komponente im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat in: Heinz Rausch (ed.) Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) pp. 330-385
34. Friedrich CJ, (1953) Der Verfassungsstaat der Neuzeit (Berlin/Göttingen/Heidelberg: Springer)
35. Friedrich CJ, (1968) Repräsentation und Verfassungsreform in Europa In: Heinz Rausch (ed.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft) pp. 209-221
36. Giscard d'Estaing V, (2002) Introductory Speech to the Convention on the Future of Europe 26 February 2002. SN 1565/02
37. Galloway D, (2001) The Treaty of Nice and Beyond: Realities and Illusions of Power in the EU (Sheffield: Sheffield University Press)
38. Göler, D. (2003). Die Europäische Union vor ihrer Konstitutionalisierung: Eine Bilanz der ersten Verfassungsentwürfe. Integration, 26(1): pp. 17-30
39. Göler D, (2003a) Between Deliberation and Bargaining: The Influence of the Institutional Setting of the Convention on the Mode of Interaction Paper presented at the CIDEL Conference, Albarracín, Zaragoza, 19-22 June 2003
40. Gray M, (2000) Negotiating EU Treaties: The Case for a New Approach In: Best, E., Gray, M. & Stubb, A. (eds) Rethinking the European Union. IGC 2000 and Beyond (Maastricht European Institute of Public Administration) pp. 263-280
41. Gray M, Stubb A, (2001) The Treaty of Nice — Negotiating a Poisoned Chalice? Journal of Common Market Studies 39 Annual Review pp. 5-23
42. Hoffmann L, (2002) The Convention on the Future of Europe — Thoughts on the Convention‐Model Jean Monnet Working Paper 11/02, NYU School of Law
43. Hobbes Th., (1962) Leviathan (Stuttgart: Reclam)
44. Hogan, WN. (1970). Political Representation and European Integration. Integration, 4: pp. 288-289
45. Joerges C, Mény Y, Weiler J, (eds) (2000) What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Polity? Responses to Joschka Fischer Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 7. Available at: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/00/000701.html (accessed 10 May 2004)
46. Kincaid J, (1999) Confederal Federalism and Citizen Representation in the European Union in: Joanne B. Brzinski, Thomas D. Lancaster and Christian Tuschhoff, (eds) Compounded Representation in Western European Federations (London/Portland: Frank Cass) pp. 34-58
47. Klingemann HD, Hofferbert RI, Budge I, (1994) Parties, Policies and Democracy (Boulder: Westview Press)
48. Leibholz G, (1966) Das Wesen der Repräsentation und der Gestaltwandel der Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co)
49. Lenaerts, K, and Desomer, M. (2002). New Model of Constitution‐making in Europe: The Quest for Legitimacy. Common Market Law Review, 39(6): pp. 1217-1253
50. Loewenberg G, (1972) Comparative Legislative Research in: Samuel C. Patterson & John C. Wahlke (eds) Comparative Legislative Behaviour: Frontiers of Research (New York: John Wiley)
51. Majone, G. (1998). Europe's ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards. European Law Journal, 4(1): pp. 5-28
52. Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15(3): pp. 338-368
53. Manin B, (1997) The Principles of Representative Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
54. Mansbridge J, (1998) The Many Faces of Representation Kennedy School of Government Politics Research Group Working Paper
55. Matthews Donald R, Valen Harry, (1999) Parliamentary Representation. The Case of the Norwegian Storting (Columbus: Ohio State University Press)
56. Matl S, (2003) Die Beiträge des Konvents bis zum 28. 10. 2002 (Plenardebatte) Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Available at: http://www.swp‐berlin.org/pdf/conveu/CONVEU_ Konventsynopse_Bd01.pdf (accessed 19 June 2003)
57. Maurer, A. (2003). Die Methode des Konvents — ein Modell deliberativer Demokratie?. Integration, 26(2): pp. 130-140
58. Maurer A, (2003a) Mass Media Publicised Discourses on the Post‐Nice‐Process IWE‐Working Paper Series No. 40. (Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences)
59. Mauer A, (2003b) Schließt sich der Kreis? Der Konvent, nationale Vorbehalte und die Regierungskonferenz. Teil 1: Analyse und Empfehlungen Available at: http://www.swp‐berlin.org/pdf/brennpunkte/eukonvregkonfanalyse01.pdf (accessed 13 August 2003)
60. Maurer A, (2003c) Less Bargaining — More Deliberation. The Convention Method for Enhancing EU Democracy International Politics and Society (1) pp. 167-190 Available at: http://fesportal.fes.de/pls/portal30/docs/FOLDER/IPG/IPG1_2003/ARTMAURER.HTM (accessed 19 June 2003)
61. Miller W, et al. (1999) Policy Representation in Western Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
62. Mirabeau HGComte de, (1843) Œuvres Paris
63. Moravscik A, (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press)
64. Moravcsik, A, and Nicolaidis, K. (1999). Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1): pp. 59-85
65. Müller WC, Saalfeld T, (eds) (1997) Members of Parliament in Western Europe: Roles and Behaviour (London: Frank Cass)
66. Norman P, (2003) The Accidental Constitution. The Story of the European Convention (Brussels: EuroComment)
67. O'Neill J, (2001) Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World Government and Policy 19 pp. 483-500 Available at: http://www.euroecolecon.org/frontiers/Frontiers1/F1Contributions/F1papers/150-paper.pdfin (accessed 25 June 2003)
68. Peek GA, (1954) The Political Writings of John Adams (New York: Bobbs‐Merrill)
69. Pernice, I. (2001). Europäische Grundrechte‐Charta und Konventsverfahren. Zehn Thesen zum Prozess der europäischen Verfassung nach Nizza. Integration, 24(2): pp. 194-197
70. Phillips A, (1995) The Politics of Presence (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
71. Pitkin HF, (1967) The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: The University of California Press)
72. Przeworski A, Stokes SC, & Manin B, (eds) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
73. Rausch H, (1968) Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft)
74. Reh C, Wessels W, (2002) Towards an Innovative Mode of Treaty Reform? Three Sets of Expectations for the Convention Collegium No. 24
75. Risse, T. (2000). ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1): pp. 1-39
76. Sartori G, (1987) The Theory of Democracy Revisited (Chatham: Chatham House)
77. Saward M, (1998) The Terms of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press)
78. Saward M, (2000) Democratic Innovation In: Saward, M. (ed.) Democratic Innovation. Deliberation, representation and association (London/New York: Routledge)
79. Schmidt VA, (2002) The Europeanization of Representation in ‘Simple’ and ‘Compounded’ Systems: Changes in National Practices, Challenges to National Ideas and Discourse Paper Presented at the joint seminar ‘Europeanization and the Reshaping of Representation’ at the European University Institute. Available at: http://people.bu.edu/vschmidt/eurep9h.htm (accessed 23 June 2003)
80. Schmitt C, (1993) Verfassungslehre (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot)
81. Schmuck, O. (2003). Die Beteiligung der Zivilgesellschaft — notwendige Ergänzung der Konventsstrategie. Integration, 26(2): pp. 162-165
82. Scholl B, (2003) Wie tragfähig ist die neue institutionelle Architektur der EU? Der Verfassungsentwurf des Konvents im Spiegel nationalstaatlicher Präferenzen in: Integration 26 (3) pp. 204-217
83. Shaw J, (2003) What's in a Convention? Process and Substance in the Project of European Constitution‐Building Political Science Series No. 89, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna
84. Shaw, J. (2003a). Process, Responsibility and Inclusion of the EU Constitutionalism. European Law Journal, 9(1): pp. 45-68
85. Smith BPG, (2002) Constitution Building in the European Union. The process of Treaty Reforms (The Hague: Kluwer Law International)
86. Sunstein CR, (2001) Republic.com (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
87. Voegelin E, (1991) Die neue Wissenschaft der Politik (Freiburg: Alber)
88. Voet R, (1998) Feminism and Citizenship (London: Sage)
89. Weiler JHH, (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’ and other essays on European Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)