Peak council organising at work: ACTU strategy 1994–2000

Labour and Industry

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-15

  Cooper, Rae ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045014033     PISSN: 10301763     EISSN: 23255676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2003.10669277     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Australian Council of Trade Unions [ACTU]. 1987. Future Strategies for the Trade Union Movement ACTU Congress Document, ACTU, Melbourne.
2. Australian Council of Trade Unions [ACTU]. 1993. “Organising Works’, ACTU Congress Document, ACTU, Melbourne.
3. Australian Council of Trade Unions [ACTU]. 1999. Unions@work: The challenge for unions in creating a just and fair society ACTU, Melbourne
4. Banks, A. and Metzgar, J. 1989. ‘Participating in Management: Union organising in a New Terrain’. Labour Research Review, 18 (Fall/Winter) pp. 61 71.
5. Beaumont, P. and Harris, R. 1990. ‘Union Recruitment and Organising Attempts in Britain in the 1980s’. Industrial Relations Journal, 21 (4) pp. 274 286.
6. Briggs, C. 1999. The Rise and Fall of the ACTU: Maturation. Hegemony and Decline unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sydney.
7. Bronfenbrenner, K. and Juravich, T. 1998. “ ‘It Takes More Than House Calls: Organizing to Win with a comprehensive Union-Building Strategy’ ”. In Organizing To Win: New Research on Union Strategies Edited by: Bronfenbrenner, K., Friedman, S., Hurd, R., Oswald, R. and Seeber, R. 19Ithaca: ILR Press. N.Y., pp. 36.
8. Carter, B. 2000. ‘Adoption of the Organising Model in British Trade Unions: Some Evidence from MSF’. Work, Employment and Society, 14 (1) pp. 117 36.
9. Conrow, T. 1991. ‘Contract Servicing From An Organizing Model”. Labor Research Review, 17 pp. 45 59.
10. Cooper, R. 2000. ‘Organise, organise, organise! ACTU Congress 2000’. Journal of Industrial Relations, 42 (4): 582–594.
11. Cooper, R. 2002. Organising at work: Growth strategies in Australian white-collar unions, 1996–2000 unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
12. Costa, M. 1997. “ ‘Union Reform: Union Strategy and the Third Wave’ ”. In Reforming Australia's Unions, Federation Press Sydney Edited by: Costa, M. and Hearn, M. 12–25.
13. Crosby, M. 2002. “ ‘Down with the Dictator: The role of trade unions in the future’ ”. In Working futures: The changing nature of work and employment relations in Australia Edited by: Callus, R. and Lansbury, R. 115Sydney: The Federation Press. pp. 131.
14. Fiorito, J. and Young, A. 1998. “ ‘Union Voting Intentions: Human Resource Policies, Organizational Characteristics and Attitudes’ ”. In Organizing To Win: New Research on Union Strategies Edited by: Bronfenbrenner, K., Friedman, S., Hurd, R., Oswald, R. and Seeber, R. 232Ithaca: ILR Press. pp. 246.
15. Grabelsky, J. and Hurd, R. 1994. Reinventing an Organizing Union: Strategies for Change 95 Proceedings of the Industrial Relations Research Association 46th Annual Meeting, Boston, January 3 5 1994, pp. 104.
16. Griffin, G. 1991. ‘The Authority of the ACTU’. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 5 (1) pp.81 103.
17. th AIRAANZ Conference 180 Organising Works: Objectives, Evolution, Outcomes, Queenstown New Zealand, pp. 190.
18. Heery, E., Simms, M., Delbridge, R., Salmon, J. and Simpson, D. 2000. “Organising Unionism Comes to the UK”. Employee Relations, 22 pp. 38 57.
19. Heishner, B. and Lund, J. 1997. ‘Union commitment types and union activist involvement: lessons for union organizers and educators?’. Labor Studies Journal, 22 (Summer) pp. 66 83.
20. Holland, P. 1999. ‘Organising Works Meeting the Challenge of Declining Trade Union Membership”. International Employment Relations Review, 5 (1) pp. 63 74.
21. Hurd, R. 1995. ‘Contesting the Dinosaur Image The Labor Movement's Search for a Future’, Mimeograph, Labor Studies Department, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Cornell.
22. Kelly, J. and Heery, E. 1989. ‘Full-time Officers and Trade Union Recruitment’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 27 (2) pp. 196 213.
23. McDonald, T. 1989. ‘Fundamentals Before Frills’, Address to ACTU Congress, reproduced in. ACTU Bulletin: Congress, 89 November, ACTU, Melbourne.
24. Midwest Center for Labor Research. 1991. Labor Research Review An Organizing Model of Unionism 17
25. Muehlenkamp, R. 1991. ‘Organizing Never Stops’. Labor Research Review, 17 pp. 1 5.
26. th Annual Conference Proceedings 358 ‘Building an Organizing Culture of Unionism’ in Boston, pp. 366.
27. Nissen, B. 1998. “ ‘Utilizing the Membership to Organize the Unorganized’ ”. In Organizing To Win: New Research on Union Strategies Edited by: Bronfenbrcnner, K., Friedman, S., Hurd, R., Oswald, R. and Seeber, R. 135Ithaca: ILR Press. pp. 149.
28. Oxenbridge, S. 1997. ‘Organizing Strategies and Organizing Reform in New Zealand Service Sector Unions’. Labor Studies Journal, 22 (3): 3–27.
29. Oxenbridge, S. 1998. Running to Stand Still: New Zealand Service Sector Trade Union Responses to the Employment Contracts Act 1991, Ph.D. Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.
30. Oxenbridge, S. “ (forthcoming) ‘The Service and Food Workers Union of Aotearoa: A Story of Crisis and Change’ ”. In Trade Union Organising, Adaptation and Renewal: A Comparative Study of Trade Union Movements in Five Countries Edited by: Fairbrother, P. and Yates, C. London: Mansell.
31. Snape, E., Redman, T. and Chan, A. 2000. ‘Commitment to the union: a survey of research and the implications for industrial relations and trade unions’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2 (3) pp. 205 230.
32. Tumbull, P. 1995. Organising Works in Australia, Will it work in Britain? University of Melbourne Department of Management and Industrial Relations Working Paper Series, Working Paper 97, Melbourne University, Melbourne.
33. Undy, R., Ellis, V., McCarthy, W and Halmos, A. 1981. Change in Trade Unions: The Development of UK Unions since the 1960s London: Hutchinson.
34. Voss, K. and Sherman, R. 2000. ‘Breaking the Iron Law of Oligarchy: Union Revitalization in the American Labor Movement’. American Journal of Sociology, 106 (2): 303–349.