The Role of the Family Court in Medical Procedure Cases

Australian Journal of Human Rights

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 242-261

  Nicholson, Alastair ^a   Harrison, Margaret ^a   Sandor, Danny ^a  

^a Family Court of Australia ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044989484     PISSN: 1323238X     EISSN: 2573573X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1323238X.1996.11910958     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Millbank J “When is A Girl A Boy? Re A (A Child)" (1995) 9 Australian Journal of Family Law 173.
2. Nicholson A “The Medical Treatment of Minors and Intellectually Disabled Persons - U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, Article 23” in First World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Rights -Congress Papers, 1994.
3. Wilson J, Carlson G, Taylor M & Griffin J Menstrual Management and Fertility Management/or Women who have an Intellecrual Disability: An Analysis of Australian Policy (Report funded by the Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services, 1992)
4. Brady S “The Rights of the Child to be Heard. The Extended Jurisdiction - Potential Hearing Impairments in the Legal Process” 29th Proceedings of the Australian Legal Convention 1995 at 11-2.
5. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer 25 at 32.
6. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer 25 at 77, 241.
7. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 256.
8. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 257.
9. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 282.
10. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 257
11. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 261.
12. Rhoades H “Sterilisation, Gender Reassignment and Life Support - Mapping the Welfare Jurisdiction of the Family Court” (1994) 10(1) Australian Family Lawyer at 263
13. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 31-2.
14. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 183-4.
15. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 253.
16. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 259-60.
17. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 82, 146.
18. Brady S “The Rights of the Child to be Heard” Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - A Repon to the Anomey-General (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1994) at 23.
19. Rhoades H “Intellectual Disability and Sterilisation - An Inevitable Connection?” (1995) 9 Australian Journal of Family Law 234 especially at 240.
20. Rhoades H “Intellectual Disability and Sterilisation - An Inevitable Connection?” (1995) 9 Australian Journal of Family Law at 82, 150.
21. Morgan J “Controlling Minors’ Fertility” (1986) 12 Monash University Law Review 161
22. Parkinson P “Children’s Rights and Doctors’ Immunities: The Implications of the High Court’s Decision in Re Marion” (1992) 6 Australian Journal of Family Law 101.
23. Nicholls M “Keyholders and Flak Jackets - Consent to Medical Treatment for Children” [1994] Family Law (UK) 81.
24. Seymour J “The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters” (1992) 21 Federal Law Review 1 at 18-20;
25. Seymour J “The Role of the Family Court of Australia in Child Welfare Matters” (1992) 21 Federal Law Review 1 at 606
26. Rayner M The Commonwealth’s Role in Preventing Child Abuse - A Report to the Minister for Family Services (Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne 1995)
27. Tait D, Camey T and Deane K “Legal Regulation of Sterilisation: The Role of Guardianship Tribunals inNSW and Victoria” (1994) 8 Australian Journal of Family law 141 at 161.
28. Blackwood J. “Sterilisation of the Intellectually Disabled: The Need for Reform” (1991) 5 Australian Journal of Family law 138;
29. Brady S “The Rights of the Child to be Heard” (1991) 5 Australian Journal of Family law at 4-9.
30. Filipello A and Newitt L “Keya to Simplification - The New Family Court Procedures” (1995) 10(4) Australian Family Lawyer 17.
31. Smith et al Representing the Child’s Interests in the Family Court - Discussion Paper (Family Court of Auatralia, 1995).
32. Brady “The Righta of the Child to be Heard” Representing the Child’s Interests in the Family Court - Discussion Paper (Family Court of Auatralia, 1995) at 17-8
33. Dittman “Medical Procedure Cases in the Family Court - the Role of Protocols” (forthcoming) Proceedings ofihe Second National Conference of the Family Court of Australia 1995;
34. Brady “The Rights of the Child to be Heard” (forthcoming) Proceedings ofihe Second National Conference of the Family Court of Australia 1995; 16.
35. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - Discussion Pape (Family Law Council, Canberra, 1993).
36. Family Law Council, Sterilisation and Other Medical Procedures on Children - Discussion Pape (Family Law Council, Canberra, 1993). at 82, 143.
37. Family Law Council, Involving and Representing Children in Family law (Family Law Council, 1995);
38. Family Law Council, Representation of Children in Family law Proceedings (Family Law Council, 1989).
39. Family Law Council, Representation of Children in Family law Proceedings (Family Law Council, 1989) at 80, 775-6.
40. Family Law Council, Representation of Children in Family law Proceedings (Family Law Council, 1989) at 82, 156-7.
41. Brady S “Medical Procedure Cases in the Family Court - the Role of Protocols” (forthcoming) Proceedings of the Second National Conference of the Family Court of Australia 1995 at 10-1