The Law: Termination of the ABM Treaty and the Political Question Doctrine: Judicial Succor for Presidential Power

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 156-166

  Adler, David Gray ^a  

^a IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044982573     PISSN: 03604918     EISSN: 17415705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00041.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Adler, David Gray. 1981. The Framers and treaty termination: A matter of symmetry. Arizona State Law Journal 1981: 891–923.
2. Adler, David Gray. 1986. The Constitution and the termination of treaties. New York: Garland Publishing.
3. Cox, Archibald. 1967. The role of the Supreme Court in American society. Marquette Law Review 50: 575–603.
4. Earle, Edward Meade, ed. 1937. Federalist Papers. New York: Modern Library.
5. Elliot, Jonathan. 1836. Debates in the several state conventions.
6. Henkin, Louis. 1972. Foreign affairs and the Constitution. Mincola, NY: Foundation Press.
7. Henkin, Louis. 1990. Constitutionalism, democracy, and foreign affairs. New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Jackson, Robert H. 1949. The struggle for judicial supremacy. New York: Knopf.
9. Jaffe, Louis. 1961. Standing to secure judicial review: Public actions. Harvard Law Review 74: 1265.
10. Madison, James. 1900-1910. Writings of James Madison, G. Hunt, ed. New York: Putnam.
11. Reeves, Jesse S. 1921. The Jones Act and the denunciation of treaties. American Journal of International Law 15: 33.
12. Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. 1973. The imperial presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Taft, William Howard. 1916. The boundaries between the executive, the legislative and the judicial branches of the government. Yale Law Journal 25: 599.
14. Warren, Charles. 1922. The Supreme Court in United States history. Boston: Little Brown.
15. Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. Toward neutral principles of constitutional law. Harvard Law Review 73: 1.