Mission impossible: the European Union and policy coherence for development

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 323-342

  Carbone, Maurizio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EU development policy; foreign aid; Millennium Development Goals; Policy coherence

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044982147     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330802144992     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ashoff, G., 2005. Enhancing policy coherence for development: justification, recognition and approaches to achievements, Bonn: German Development Institute. (DIE Studies 11)
2. Carbone, M., 2007. The European Union and international development: the politics of foreign aid, London: Routledge.
3. Carbone, M., 2008. The new season of EU development policy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 9(2): 111–113.
4. th Council Meeting, Development 1 June, Luxembourg
5. th Council Meeting, Development, 8631/97 (Presse 183–G) 5 June, Luxembourg
6. Council. 23 May 2005. 2660th Council meeting, External Relations, 8817/05 (Press 112) 23 May, Brussels
7. DAC [Development Assistance Committee]. 2007. DAC peer review of the European Community, Paris: OECD.
8. DAC. 2008. Development cooperation report 2007, Paris: OECD.
9. Di Francesco, M., 2001. Process not Outcomes in New Public Management? ‘Policy Coherence’ in Australia. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 1(3): 103–116.
10. Duke, S., 1999. Consistency as an issue in EU external activities, Maastricht: EIPA. (European Institute of Public Administration Working Paper 99/W/06)
11. Eeckhout, P., 2004. External relations of the European Union, Oxford: University Press.
12. Egenhofer, C., 2006. Policy coherence for development in the EU Council: strategies for the way forward, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
13. European Commission. 12 April 2005a. Speeding up progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, 12 April, The European Union’s contribution. COM (2005) 132
14. European Commission. 12 April 2005b. Policy coherence for development — accelerating progress towards attaining the Millennium Development Goals 12 April, COM (2005) 134
15. European Commission. 20 September 2007a. Commission working paper–EU report on policy coherence for development 20 September, COM (2007) 545
16. European Commission. 20 September 2007b. Commission staff working paper–EU report on policy for development 20 September, SEC (2007) 1202
17. ECDPM and ICEI. 2006. EU mechanisms that promote policy coherence for development: A scoping study, Amsterdam: Aksant.
18. ECDPM, Particip and ICEI. 2007. Evaluation study on the EU institutions & member states’ mechanisms for promoting policy coherence for development Available at www.three-cs.net
19. Forster, J., and Stokke, O., eds. 1999a. Policy coherence in development co-operation, London: Frank Cass.
20. Forster, J., and Stokke, O., 1999b. “ Coherence of policies towards developing countries: approaching the problematique ”. In Policy coherence in development co-operation, Edited by: Forster, J., and Stokke, O., 16–57. London: Frank Cass.
21. Gauttier, P., 2004. Horizontal coherence and the external competences of the European Union. European Law Journal, 10(1): 23–41.
22. st century, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
23. Grieg-Gran, M., 2003. “ Policy coherence and the Millennium Development Goals ”. In The Millennium Development Goals and local processes: hitting the target or missing the poor, Edited by: Satterthwaite, D., 135–152. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
24. Heynes-Renshaw, F., and Wallace, H., 2006. The Council of Ministers, 2nd ed., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Hoebink, P., 1999. “ Coherence and development policy: the case of the European Union ”. In Policy coherence in development co-operation, Edited by: Forster, J., and Stokke, O., 323–345. London: Frank Cass.
26. Hoebink, P., 2004. “ Evaluating Maastricht’s triple C: the ‘C’ of coherence ”. In The Treaty of Maastricht and Europe’s development co-operation, Edited by: Hoebink, P., 183–218. Amsterdam: Aksant.
27. Hoebink, P., 2005. “ Coherence and development policy: an autopsy with some European examples ”. In Österreichische Entwicklungspolitik–Analysen, Informationen 2004. EU–Entwicklungspolitik–Quo Vadis?, Edited by: Obrovsky, M., 37–50. Wien: ÖFSE.
28. Holland, M., 2002. The European Union and the Third World, New York: Palgrave.
29. Hydén, G., 1999. “ The shifting grounds of policy coherence in development co-operation ”. In Policy coherence in development co-operation, Edited by: Forster, J., and Stokke, O., 58–77. London: Frank Cass.
30. Kapstein, E., The Politics of Policy Coherence. Paper presented at the OECD Policy Workshop ‘Institutional Approaches to Policy Coherence for Development’. May. pp. 18–19. Paris
31. Koulaïmah-Gabriel, A., 1999. “ The EU and the developing world: Coherence between the common foreign and security policy and development co-operation ”. In Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation, Edited by: Forster, J., and Stokke, O., 346–372. London: Frank Cass.
32. Koulaïmah-Gabriel, A., and Oomen, A., 1997. Improving coherence: challenges for European development cooperation, Maastricht: ECDPM. (Policy Management Brief 9)
33. Krenzler, H.G., and Schneider, H., 1997. “ The question of consistency ”. In Foreign policy of the European Union: from EPC to CFSP and beyond, Edited by: Regelsberger, E., de Schoutheete de Tervarent, P., and Wessels, W., 133–151. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
34. Lister, M., ed. 1998. European Union development policy, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
35. Loquai, C., 1996. The Europeanisation of development cooperation; coordination, complementarity, coherence, Maastricht: ECDPM. (Working Paper 13)
36. May, P., Sapotichne, J., and Workman, S., 2006. Policy coherence and policy domain. The Policy Studies Journal, 34(3): 381–403.
37. Nugent, N., 2006. The government and politics of the European Union, 6th edn, New York: Palgrave.
38. Nuttall, S., 2005. “ Coherence and consistency ”. In International relations and the European Union, Edited by: Hill, C., and Smith, M., 91–112. Oxford: University Press.
39. OECD. July 2003. Policy coherence: Vital for global development, July, Policy Briefs.
40. Payne, A., 2005. The global politics of unequal development, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
41. Picciotto, R., 2005. The evaluation of policy coherence for development. Evaluation, 11(3): 311–330.
42. Riddell, R., 2007. Does foreign aid really work?, Oxford: University Press.
43. Roodman, D., The 2007 Commitment to Development Index: Components and Results, Washington: Center for Global Development (CGD Briefs, August.
44. Smith, M.E., 2001. “ The quest for coherence: institutional dilemmas of external action from Maastricht to Amsterdam ”. In The institutionalization of Europe, Edited by: Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., and Fligstein, N., 171–193. Oxford: University Press.
45. Stetter, S., 2004. Cross-pillar politics functional unity and institutional fragmentation of EU foreign policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4): 720–739.
46. Tietje, C., 1997. The concept of coherence in the Treaty on European Union and the Common Foreign and Security Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 2: 211–233.
47. Wallace, H., Wallace, W., and Pollack, M., eds. 2005. Policy-making in the European Union, 5th edn., Oxford: University Press.