User and carer involvement in social work education—a university case study: Manipulation or citizen control?

Social Work Education

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 403-413

  Allain, Lucille ^a   Brown, Helen Cosis ^a   Danso, Chantelle ^a   Dillon, Jean ^a   Finnegan, Pat ^a   Gadhoke, Shally ^a   Shamash, Michael ^a   Whittaker, Felicity ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Citizen Participation; Communication; Stakeholders; User and Carer Involvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044914553     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02615470600593790     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anfilogoff, S., Starr, M., and Mathias, P., 2002. Carer and Carer Trainers Focus Groups Report to the DH from Carers UK, London: City and Guilds Affinity.
2. Arnstein, S. R., 1971. ‘A ladder of citizen participation’. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute,: 1–6. April
3. Barnes, J., 2002. Focus on the Future: Key Messages from Focus Groups about the Future of Social Work Training, London: Department of Health.
4. Beresford, P., and Croft, S., 2004. ‘Service users and practitioners reunited: the key component for social work reform’. British Journal of Social Work, 34: 53–68.
5. Department of Health. 2002. Requirements for Social Work Training, London: Department of Health.
6. Dillon, J., 2004. “ ‘Fair admissions practice: acting on principle for social work’ ”. In Insight: The School of Health and Social Sciences Newsletter, London: Middlesex University.
7. General Social Care Council. 2002. Accreditation of Universities to Grant Degrees in Social Work, London: GSCC.
8. Social Care Institute for Excellence. 2004. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Social Work Education, London: SCIE.
9. Turner, M., 2003. Our Voice in Our Future: Service Users Debate the Future of the Welfare State, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.