Statistical Challenges in “Big Data” Human Neuroimaging

Neuron

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 263-268

  Smith, Stephen M ^a   Nichols, Thomas E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WHITE MATTER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHENOTYPE;

BIG DATA; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATASETS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROIMAGING; PHENOTYPE; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 85044855807     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.018     Document Type: Short Survey

References (18)

1. Andersson, J.L.R., Sotiropoulos, S.N., An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125 (2016), 1063–1078.
2. Bearden, C.E., Thompson, P.M., Emerging global initiatives in neurogenetics: the enhancing neuroimaging genetics through meta-analysis (ENIGMA) consortium. Neuron 94 (2017), 232–236.
3. Duff, E.P., Vennart, W., Wise, R.G., Howard, M.A., Harris, R.E., Lee, M., Wartolowska, K., Wanigasekera, V., Wilson, F.J., Whitlock, M., et al. Learning to identify CNS drug action and efficacy using multistudy fMRI data. Sci. Transl. Med., 7, 2015, 274ra16.
4. Fry, A., Littlejohns, T.J., Sudlow, C., Doherty, N., Adamska, L., Sprosen, T., Collins, R., Allen, N.E., Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186 (2017), 1026–1034.
5. Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., Wang, P., Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 167 (2010), 748–751.
6. Le Floch, E., Guillemot, V., Frouin, V., Pinel, P., Lalanne, C., Trinchera, L., Tenenhaus, A., Moreno, A., Zilbovicius, M., Bourgeron, T., et al. Significant correlation between a set of genetic polymorphisms and a functional brain network revealed by feature selection and sparse Partial Least Squares. Neuroimage 63 (2012), 11–24.
7. Miller, K.L., Alfaro-Almagro, F., Bangerter, N.K., Thomas, D.L., Yacoub, E., Xu, J., Bartsch, A.J., Jbabdi, S., Sotiropoulos, S.N., Andersson, J.L., et al. Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study. Nat. Neurosci. 19 (2016), 1523–1536.
8. Mueller, S.G., Weiner, M.W., Thal, L.J., Petersen, R.C., Jack, C.R., Jagust, W., Trojanowski, J.Q., Toga, A.W., Beckett, L., Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer's disease: the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Alzheimers Dement. 1 (2005), 55–66.
9. Munafò, M.R., Tilling, K., Taylor, A.E., Evans, D.M., Davey Smith, G., Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations. Int. J. Epidemiol., 2017, 10.1093/ije/dyx206 Published online September 27, 2017.
10. Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B., The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1983), 41–55.
11. Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Douaud, G., Beckmann, C.F., Glasser, M.F., Griffanti, L., Smith, S.M., Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers. Neuroimage 90 (2014), 449–468.
12. Smith, S.M., Nichols, T.E., Vidaurre, D., Winkler, A.M., Behrens, T.E., Glasser, M.F., Ugurbil, K., Barch, D.M., Van Essen, D.C., Miller, K.L., A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18 (2015), 1565–1567.
13. Van Essen, D.C., Smith, S.M., Barch, D.M., Behrens, T.E., Yacoub, E., Ugurbil, K., WU-Minn HCP Consortium. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80 (2013), 62–79.
14. Volkow, N.D., Koob, G.F., Croyle, R.T., Bianchi, D.W., Gordon, J.A., Koroshetz, W.J., Pérez-Stable, E.J., Riley, W.T., Bloch, M.H., Conway, K., et al. The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 2017, 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.002 Published online October 10, 2017.
15. Westfall, J., Yarkoni, T., Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS ONE, 11, 2016, e0152719.
16. Winkler, A.M., Webster, M.A., Vidaurre, D., Nichols, T.E., Smith, S.M., Multi-level block permutation. Neuroimage 123 (2015), 253–268.
17. Winkler, A.M., Ridgway, G.R., Douaud, G., Nichols, T.E., Smith, S.M., Faster permutation inference in brain imaging. Neuroimage 141 (2016), 502–516.
18. Winkler, A.M., Webster, M.A., Brooks, J.C., Tracey, I., Smith, S.M., Nichols, T.E., Non-parametric combination and related permutation tests for neuroimaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37 (2016), 1486–1511.