Quality of Experience (QoE)-aware placement of applications in Fog computing environments

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing

Volumn 132, Issue , 2019, Pages 190-203

  Mahmud, Redowan ^a   Srirama, Satish Narayana ^a,b   Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri ^a   Buyya, Rajkumar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Application placement; Fog computing; Fuzzy logic; Quality of experience; User expectation

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; FOG; FUZZY LOGIC; INTERNET OF THINGS; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

APPLICATION PLACEMENTS; COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); NETWORK CONGESTIONS; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); RESOURCE CONSUMPTION; SERVICE DELIVERY; USER EXPECTATIONS;

FOG COMPUTING;

EID: 85044848033     PISSN: 07437315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2018.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aazam, M., St-Hilaire, M., Lung, C.H., Lambadaris, I., MeFoRE: QoE-based resource estimation at fog to enhance QoS in IoT. Proc. of the 23rd International Conference on Telecommunications ICT ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1–5.
2. Achterberg, T., SCIP: Solving constraint integer programs. Math. Program. Comput. 1:1 (2009), 1–41.
3. Anand, A., de Veciana, G., Measurement-based scheduler for multi-class QoE optimization in wireless networks. Proc. of the 36th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications INFOCOM ’17, 2017, IEEE, 1–9.
4. Ansari, A., Bakar, A.A., A comparative study of three artificial intelligence techniques: Genetic algorithm, neural network, and fuzzy logic, on scheduling problem. Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence with Applications in Engineering and Technology ICAIET ’14, 2014, IEEE, 31–36.
5. Bellavista, P., Zanni, A., Feasibility of Fog computing deployment based on docker containerization over raspberrypi. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, 2017, ACM, 16.
6. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S., Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. Proc. of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing MCC ’12, 2012, ACM, 13–16.
7. Brogi, A., Forti, S., QoS-aware deployment of IoT applications through the fog. IEEE Internet Things J. PP:99 (2017), 1–10.
8. Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C.A., Buyya, R., CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. - Pract. Exp. 41:1 (2011), 23–50.
9. Chang, C., Srirama, S.N., Buyya, R., Indie fog: An efficient fog-computing infrastructure for the internet of things. Computer 50:9 (2017), 92–98.
10. Chiandussi, G., Codegone, M., Ferrero, S., Varesio, F.E., Comparison of multi-objective optimization methodologies for engineering applications. Comput. Math. Appl. 63:5 (2012), 912–942.
11. Dutta, S., Taleb, T., Frangoudis, P.A., Ksentini, A., On-the-fly Qoe-aware transcoding in the mobile edge. Proc. of the Global Communications Conference GLOBECOM ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1–6.
12. E. Recommendation, Definitions of Terms Related to Quality of Service, 2008.
13. Elkhatib, Y., Porter, B., Ribeiro, H.B., Zhani, M.F., Qadir, J., Rivière, E., On using micro-clouds to deliver the fog. IEEE Internet Comput. 21:2 (2017), 8–15.
14. F. ITU-T IPTV, Definition of Quality of Experience (QoE), 2007.
15. Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P., A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw. 24:2 (2010), 36–41.
16. Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R., iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Softw. Pract. Exper., 2017.
17. Helbig, M., Deb, K., Engelbrecht, A., Key challenges andfuture directions of dynamic multi-objective optimisation. Proc. of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1256–1261.
18. Hofeld, T., Schatz, R., Egger, S., SOS: The MOS is not enough!. Proc. of the Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience QoMEX ’11, 2011, IEEE, 131–136.
19. Hong, K., Lillethun, D., Ramachandran, U., Ottenwälder, B., Koldehofe, B., Mobile fog: A programming model for large-scale applications on the internet of things. Proc. of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, 2013, ACM, 15–20.
20. Hu, P., Ning, H., Qiu, T., Zhang, Y., Luo, X., Fog computing-based face identification and resolution scheme in internet of things. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 13 (2017), 1910–1920.
21. Iotti, N., Picone, M., Cirani, S., Ferrari, G., Improving quality of experience in future wireless access networks through fog computing. IEEE Internet Comput. 21:2 (2017), 26–33.
22. Laghari, K.U.R., Crespi, N., Molina, B., Palau, C.E., QoE aware service delivery in distributed environment. Proc. of the IEEE Workshops of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications WAINA ’11, 2011, IEEE, 837–842.
23. Li, L., Rong, M., Zhang, G., An internet of things QoE evaluation method-based on multiple linear regression analysis. Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Computer Science Education ICCSE ’15, 2015, IEEE, 925–928.
24. Lin, Y., Shen, H., Cloud fog: Towards high quality of experience in cloud gaming. Proc. of the 44th International Conference on Parallel Processing ICPP ’15, 2015, IEEE, 500–509.
25. Lin, X., Wu, W., Zhu, Y., Qiu, T., Mi, Z., SARS: A novel QoE-based service-aware resource scheduling scheme in wireless network. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Wireless Broadband ICUWB ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1–4.
26. Mahmud, M.R., Afrin, M., Razzaque, M.A., Hassan, M.M., Alelaiwi, A., Alrubaian, M., Maximizing quality of experience through context-aware mobile application scheduling in cloudlet infrastructure. Softw. - Pract. Exp. 46:11 (2016), 1525–1545 spe.2392.
27. Mahmud, R., Ramamohanarao, K., Buyya, R., Fog computing: A taxonomy, survey and future directions. Beniamino, D.M., Laurence, Y., Li, K.-C., Antonio, E., (eds.) Internet of Everything: Algorithms, Methodologies, Technologies and Perspectives, 2017, Springer.
28. Mamdani, E., Assilian, S., An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. Man–Mach. Stud. 7:1 (1975), 1–13.
29. Merino, P., Martini, M.G., Schatz, R., Skorin-Kapov, L., Varela, M., Improving QoS and QoE for mobile communications. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2013 (2013), 1–2.
30. Nam, H., Kim, K.-H., Schulzrinne, H., Qoe matters more than QoS: Why people stop watching cat videos. Proc. of the 35th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications INFOCOM ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1–9.
31. O.C. Architecture Working Group OpenFog Reference Architecture for Fog Computing, OPFRA001, 20817, 2017, p. 162.
32. Peng, S., Fajardo, J.O., Khodashenas, P.S., Blanco, B., Liberal, F., Ruiz, C., Turyagyenda, C., Wilson, M., Vadgama, S., QoE-oriented mobile edge service management leveraging SDN and NFV. Mobile Inf. Syst., 2017, 2017.
33. Saurez, E., Hong, K., Lillethun, D., Ramachandran, U., Ottenwälder, B., Incremental deployment and migration of geo-distributed situation awareness applications in the fog. Proc. of the 10th ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-Based Systems DEBS ’16, 2016, ACM, 258–269.
34. Skarlat, O., Nardelli, M., Schulte, S., Dustdar, S., Towards QoS-aware fog service placement. Proc. of the First IEEE International Conference on Fog and Edge Computing ICFEC ’17, 2017, IEEE.
35. Slabicki, M., Grochla, K., Performance evaluation of CoAP, SNMP and NETCONF protocols in fog computing architecture. Proc. of the IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium NOMS ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1315–1319.
36. Taneja, M., Davy, A., Resource aware placement of data analytics platform in fog computing. Procedia Comput. Sci. 97 (2016), 153–156 2nd International Conference on Cloud Forward: From Distributed to Complete Computing.
37. Taneja, M., Davy, A., Resource-aware placement of IoT application modules in fog-cloud computing paradigm. Proc. of the IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management IM ’15, 2017, IEEE, 1222–1228.
38. Tordera, E.M., Masip-Bruin, X., García-Almiñana, J., Jukan, A., Ren, G.-J., Zhu, J., Do we all really know what a fog node is? current trends towards an open definition. Comput. Commun. 109 (2017), 117–130.
39. Varela, M., Skorin-Kapov, L., Ebrahimi, T., Quality of service versus quality of experience. Quality of Experience, 2014, Springer, 85–96.
40. Yangui, S., Ravindran, P., Bibani, O., Glitho, R.H., Hadj-Alouane, N.B., Morrow, M.J., Polakos, P.A., A platform-as-a-service for hybrid cloud/fog environments. Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks LANMAN ’16, 2016, IEEE, 1–7.
41. Zachariah, T., Klugman, N., Campbell, B., Adkins, J., Jackson, N., Dutta, P., The internet of things has a gateway problem. Proc. of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications HotMobile ’15, 2015, ACM, 27–32.
42. Zao, J.K., Gan, T.T., You, C.K., Méndez, S.J.R., Chung, C.E., Te Wang, Y., Mullen, T., Jung, T.P., Augmented brain computer interaction-based on fog computing and linked data. Proc. of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments IE ’14, 2014, IEEE, 374–377.
43. Zhou, X., Sun, M., Wang, Y., Wu, X., A new QoE-driven video cache allocation scheme for mobile cloud server. Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Heterogeneous Networking for Quality, Reliability, Security and Robustness QSHINE ’15, 2015, IEEE, 122–126.