Probation training: Evidence from newly qualified officers

Social Work Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 53-68

  Gregory, Marilyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Development; Learning; Probation; Social Work; Training; Workload

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044797039     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02615470601036575     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arendt, H., 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem, London: Faber and Faber.
2. Bhui, H. S., 2001. ‘New probation: closer to the end of social work?’. British Journal of Social Work, 31: 637–639.
3. Briggs, J. B., 1993. ‘From theory to practice, a cognitive systems approach’. Higher Education Research and Development, 12 (1): 73–85.
4. CCETSW Paper 30. 1991. Rules and Requirements for the Diploma in Social Work, London: Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work.
5. Chaudry, G., and Meikle, C., 2000. ‘The trainees view’. Criminal Justice Matters,: 23
6. Community Justice National Training Organisation. 2001. Report on Inspection Visits to Programmes Leading to the Diploma in Probation Studies, London: CJNTO.
7. Dempsey, M., Halton, C., and Murphy, M., 2001. ‘Reflective learning in social work education: scaffolding the process’. Social Work Education, 20 (6): 631–641.
8. Dews, V., and Watts, J., 1994. Review of Probation Officer Recruitment and Qualifying Training, London: Home Office.
9. Eadie, T., 2000. “ ‘From befriending to punishing: changing boundaries in the probation service’ ”. In Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace, Edited by: Malin, N. London: Routledge.
10. Fuller, R., and Petch, A., 1995. Practitioner Research: The Reflexive Social Worker, Buckingham: Open University Press.
11. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Aldine.
12. Gould, N., 2000. ‘Becoming a learning organisation: a social work example’. Social Work Education, 19 (6): 585–596.
13. Gould, N., and Taylor, I., 1996. Reflective Learning for Social Work, Aldershot: Arena.
14. Home Office. 1989a. London: Home Office. Review of Probation Training Sponsorship (The Coleman Report)
15. Home Office. 1989b. London: Home Office. The Nature of Probation Practice Today (The Davies Report)
16. Home Office. 1999a. The Diploma in Probation Studies, Regulatory Framework, London: Home Office.
17. Home Office. 1999b. The Diploma in Probation Studies: Guidance Document on the Core Curriculum, London: Home Office.
18. Howard, M..
19. Ixer, G., 1999. ‘There's no such thing as reflection’. British Journal of Social Work, 29: 513–527.
20. Jarvis, S., 2002. ‘A critical review: integrating knowledge and practice’. British Journal of Community Justice, 1 (1): 65–78.
21. Jordan, B., 1979. Helping in Social Work, London: Routledge and Kegan-Paul.
22. Knight, C., 2002. “ ‘Training for a modern service’ ”. In Probation, Working for Justice, Edited by: Ward, D, Scott, J, and Lacey, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Knight, C., and Ward, D., 2001. ‘Qualifying probation training: implications for social work education’. Social Work Education, 20 (2): 175–186.
24. Knight, C., and White, K., 2001. ‘The integration of theory and practice within the diploma in probation studies: how is it achieved’. Probation Journal, 28 (3)
25. Marsh, P., and Triseliotis, J., 1996. Ready to Practise? Social Workers and Probation Officers: Their Training and First Year in Work
26. Mason, J., 2002. Qualitative Researching, London: Sage.
27. McGowan, V., 2002. ‘The NVQ—a means to an end?’. Probation Journal, 49 (1): 35–39.
28. Nellis, M., 2000a. ‘The new probation training’. Criminal Justice Matters,: 22–23. Spring
29. Nellis, M., 2000b. “ ‘Taking oppression seriously: a critique of managerialism in social work/probation’ ”. In Social Work, Making a Difference, Edited by: Paylor, I. Birmingham: Venture Press.
30. Nellis, M., 2001a. ‘The new probation training in England and Wales, realising the potential’. Social Work Education, 20 (4): 415–431.
31. Nellis, M., 2001b. ‘The Diploma in Probation Studies in the Midland region: celebration and critique after the first two years’. Howard Journal, 40 (4): 377–401.
32. Nellis, M., 2003. ‘Probation training and the community justice curriculum’. British Journal of Social Work, 33: 943–959.
33. Pearson, G., 1973. ‘Social work as the privatised solution of public ills’. British Journal of Social Work, 3 (2): 209–227.
34. Ruch, G., 2002. ‘From triangle to spiral: reflective practice in social work education, practice and research’. Social Work Education, 21 (2): 199–207.
35. Schofield, H., 1999. ‘Probation training: late modernism or post modernism’. Probation Journal, 46 (4): 256–258.
36. Schon, D., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
37. Senior, P., 2000. ‘Fact and fiction: another perspective on probation training’. Criminal Justice Matters,: 17–18. Summer
38. Solas, J., 1994. ‘Why enter social work?’. Issues in Social Work Education, 14 (2): 63
39. Vennard, J., Hedderman, C., and Sugg, D., 1997. Changing Offenders' Attitudes and Behaviour: What Works?, London: Home Office.