Presidential Leadership and Administrative Coordination: Examining the Theory of a Unified Executive

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 433-456

  West, William F ^a  

^a Department of Mathematics Texas A M University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044796328     PISSN: 03604918     EISSN: 17415705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02556.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, Rebecca. 2002. Regulating the regulators: John Graham at OIRA. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, February 23.
2. Anderson, James E. 1991. The Carter administration and regulatory reform: Searching for the right way. Congress and the Presidency 18: 121-45.
3. Bernstein, Marver H. 1955. Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Blumstein, James. 2001. Presidential administration and administrative law: Regulatory review by the Executive Office of the President: An overview and policy analysis of current issues. Duke Law Journal 51: 851.
5. Brownlow, Louis B. 1958. The autobiography of Louis Brownlow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Commission on the Organization of the Executive Branch of Government (Hoover Commission Report). 1949. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Comptroller General. 1981. Improved quality, adequate resources, and consistent oversight needed if regulatory analysis is to help control the cost of regulations. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senste. Washington, DC: GAO/PAD-83-6.
8. Cronin, Thomas E., and Michael A. Genovese. 1998. The paradoxes of the American presidency. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Durant, Robert F. 1992. The administrative presidency revisited: Public lands, the BLM, and the Reagan revolution. Albany: State University of New York Press.
10. Eads, George C., and Michael Fix. 1984. Relief or reform: Reagan's regulatory dilemma. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
11. Friedman, Barry D. 1995. Regulation in the Reagan-Bush era: The eruption of presidential influence. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
12. Government Accountability Office. 2003. OMB's role in reviews of agency draft rules and the transparency of those reviews. GAO-03-929. Retrieved April 3, 2004, from http://www.gao.gov.atext/.103929.text.
13. Heclo, Hugh. 1975. OMB and the presidency—The problem of neutral competence. Public Interest 38: 80-98.
14. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. Issue networks and the executive establishment. InIn The new American political system, edited by Anthony King. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
15. Heclo, Hugh, and Lester M. Salamon. 1981. The illusion of presidential government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16. Immigratin and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983).
17. Kagan, Elena. 2001. Presidential administration. Harvard Law Review 114: 2246-387.
18. Kaufman, Herbert A. 1956. Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration. American Political Science Review 50: 1057-73.
19. Lowi, Theodore J. 1969. The end of liberalism: Ideology, policy, and the crisis of public authority. New York. W.W. Norton.
20. Moe, Terry M. 1985. The politicized presidency. In New directions in American politics, edited by John E. Chubb and Paul E. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21. Moe, Terry M., and Scott A. Wilson. 1994. Presidents and political structure. Law and Contemporary Problems 57: 1-44.
22. Motor Vehicle Manufactuers Association v. State Farm Mutual; Automobile Association, 463 U.S. 29 (1983).
23. Nathan, Richard. 1983. The administrative presidency. New York: Wiley.
24. OMB Watch. 2002. NHTSA issues weakened tire pressure monitoring rule (June 10, 2002).
25. OMB Watch. 2003. OMB waters down standards on factory-farm runoff (May 28, 2003). http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/1540.
26. The President's Committee on Administrative Management (Brownlow Committee). 1937. Report with special studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (Popularly known as the Brownlow Report.)
27. Shapiro, Sturart. 2005. Unequal partners: Cost-benefit analysis and executive review of regulations. Environmental Law Reporter 35: 10433.
28. Singer, Paul. 2005. By the horns. National Journal, March 26, pp. 898-905.
29. Sundquist, James L. 1981. The decline and resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
30. Waldo, Dwight. 1948. The administrative state: A study of the political theory of public administration. New York: Ronald Press.
31. Warshaw, Shirley Anne. 1996. Powersharing: White House-cabinet relations in the modern presidency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
32. Welborn, David. 1993. Regulation in the White House: The Johnson presidency. Austin: University of Texas Press.
33. West, William F. 2004. Formal procedures, informal processes, accountability, and responsiveness in bureaucratic policy making: An institutional policy analysis. Public Administration Review 64: 66-80.
34. West, William F. 2005. The institutionalization of regulatory review: Organizational stability and responsive competence at OIRA. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35: 76-93.
35. West, William F., and Joseph Cooper. 1990. Legislative influence v. presidential dominance: Competing models of bureaucratic control. Political Science Quarterly 104: 581-606.
36. White House using cuts to shuffle and shoo staff. 2005. New York Times, February 8, p. A16.
37. Wilson, James Q. 1975. The rise of the bureaucratic state. The Public Interest 41: 77-103.