ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps

Environmental Evidence

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Haddaway, Neal R ^a   Macura, Biljana ^a   Whaley, Paul ^b   Pullin, Andrew S ^c  

^a STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AMSTAR; CEESAT; DART; PRISMA; Quality appraisal; QUORUM

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044608639     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20472382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Roberts PD, Stewart GB, Pullin AS. Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine. Biol Conserv. 2006;132:409-23.
2. Vandenberg LN, Ågerstrand M, Beronius A, Beausoleil C, Bergman Å, Bero LA, et al. A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Environ Heal. 2016;15:74.
3. Whaley P, Halsall C, Ågerstrand M, Aiassa E, Benford D, Bilotta G, et al. Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: challenges, opportunities and recommendations. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:556-64.
4. Woodruff TJ, Sutton P. The navigation guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:1007-14.
5. Haddaway NR, Pullin AS. The policy role of systematic reviews: past, present and future. Springer Sci Rev. 2014;14:179-83.
6. CEE (Collaboration for Environmental Evidence). Guidelines for Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management. Version 4.2. 2013. http://environmentalevidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Review-guidelines-version-4.2-final.pdf.
7. Pullin AS, Stewart GB. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 2006;20:1647-56.
8. Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:305-8.
9. Pullin AS, Knight TM. Doing more good than harm - building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol Conserv. 2009;142:931-4.
10. Pullin AS, Knight TM. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:50-4.
11. Stewart GB, Coles CF, Pullin AS. Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects. Biol Conserv. 2005;126:270-8.
12. Fazey I, Salisbury JG, Lindenmayer D, Maindonald J, Douglas RM. Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research? Environ Conserv. 2004;31:190-8.
13. Cochrane. About us. 2017. http://www.cochrane.org/about-us. Accessed 25 July 2017.
14. The Campbell Collaboration. Vision, mission and principles - the campbell collaboration. 2017. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/about-campbell/vision-mission-and-principle.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.
15. Haddaway NR, Land M, Macura B. A little learning is a dangerous thing": a call for better understanding of the term "systematic review. Environ Int. 2016;99:356-60.
16. Haddaway NR. Response to "Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea". J Environ Manag. 2017;203:612-4.
17. Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, Mayhew A, Skidmore B, Stevens A, et al. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev. 2017;6:131.
18. O'Leary BC, Kvist K, Bayliss HR, Derroire G, Healey JR, Hughes K, et al. The reliability of evidence reviews in environmental science and conservation. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;64:75-82.
19. The Steering Group of the Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration Systematic Reviews: policies and guidelines. Campbell Syst Rev. 2015;46:1.
20. Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
21. Kitchenham B. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele: Keele University; 2004. p. 33.
22. Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Bero L, Bruce N, Falck-Ytter Y, Ghersi D, et al. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. 2016;92-93:611-6.
23. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet (Lond, England). 1999;354:1896-900.
24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264.
25. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W65-94.
26. PRISMA. Extensions in development. 2015. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/InDevelopment.aspx. Accessed 26 July 2017.
27. Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Moher D, O'Neill J, Waters E, et al. PRISMA-equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001333.
28. Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, et al. PRISMA for abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001419.
29. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
30. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
31. PRISMA. Endorse PRISMA. 2015. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/EndorsePRISMA.aspx. Accessed 25 July 2017.
32. PRISMA. PRISMA endorsers. 2015. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers.aspx#c. Accessed 25 July 2017.
33. PRISMA. Available translations. 2015. http://www.prisma-statement.org/Translations/Translations.aspx. Accessed 25 July 2017.
34. O'Leary BC, Bayliss HR, Haddaway NR. Beyond PRISMA: systematic reviews to inform marine science and policy. Mar Policy. 2015;62:261-3.
35. O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J. Ongoing developments in meta-analytic and quantitative synthesis methods: broadening the types of research questions that can be addressed. Rev Educ. 2016;4:5-27.
36. Stegenga J. Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011;42:497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.003
37. Livoreil B, Glanville J, Haddaway NR, Bayliss H, Bethel A, Lachapelle FF, et al. Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources. Environ Evid. 2017;6:23.
38. Baylissa HR, Beyer FR. Information retrieval for ecological syntheses. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6:136-48.
39. Pullin AS, Bangpan M, Dalrymple S, Dickson K, Haddaway NR, Healey JR, et al. Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas. Environ Evid. 2013;2:19.
40. Environmental Evidence. Preparing your manuscript. 2017. https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/submission-guidelines/preparing-your-manuscript. Accessed 25 July 2017.
41. Haddaway NR, Watson MJ. On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2016;5:184-91.
42. Haddaway NR, Macura B. Species' traits influenced their response to recent climate change. Nat Clim Change. 2017;7:205.
43. James KL, Randall NP, Haddaway NR. A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environ Evid BioMed Central. 2016;5:7.
44. The EQUATOR network. Reporting guidelines under development. 2017. http://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/#52. Accessed 25 July 2017.
45. Haddaway NR, Woodcock P, Macura B, Collins A. Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conserv Biol. 2015;29:1596-605.